告别高估值泡沫:探索更可持续的代币发行模式

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-12Última atualização em 2024-08-12

币界网报道:

作者:Ethan Luc 来源:coindesk 翻译:善欧巴,

阻碍主流区块链采用的主要因素仍然是普遍的看法,即该领域仍然过于注重投机。为了建立可持续的生态系统并吸引更多用户,协议必须从根本上重新考虑代币的分配方式。重点必须从虚高的估值和投机性价格行为转向长期效用和透明度。

今年,加密货币市场见证了代币发行的复苏,其中许多都采用了“低流通量、高完全稀释价值 (FDV)”策略。该计划很简单:以高价发行,以数十亿美元的估值领先,并围绕项目的潜力进行炒作。这种策略受到了广泛的批评,但对于许多追逐关注的项目来说,它已被证明是不可抗拒的。问题是什么?它完全是人为的。

“低浮动量、高 FDV”模式涉及将总代币供应量(浮动量)的一小部分释放到市场,同时为每个代币分配高价。这为项目创造了一个具有欺骗性的 FDV,许多代币持有者未能说明仍有待流通的剩余代币供应量。

虽然这种方法可以产生巨大的初始兴趣,但采用这种模式的许多项目看到的只是短期利益,而长期利益会逐渐瓦解。这不是一种可持续的方法,会分散所有加密项目的注意力,而这应该是真正的重点——长期实用性和协议采用。比特币花了数年时间才建立起用户群——而如今,项目只需一次大规模发布就能做到这一点。

加密货币必须做出更大胆的赌注,重新将行业重点放在分销和效用上,同时避免价格投机。

有一种更好的方法来管理代币发行——一种优先考虑长期效用和有机增长而不是投机收益的方法。协议开始尝试替代模型。例如,基于区块链的社交平台 FRIEND 以 100% 的浮动发行,从第一天起就将所有代币分发给社区。在 Lava Network 采取了截然不同的方法后,我相信行业必须采用区块链项目应如何处理代币分配和估值的新标准。

市场导向方法

通过分享区块链访问层 Lava 的经验和见解,我希望我们能够激发人们转向更负责任和可持续的代币发行实践。共同打造一个更强大、更具弹性、让所有参与者受益的区块链生态系统。

这种替代代币发行策略以通过去中心化交易所 (DEX) 交易实现的市场衍生 FDV 为中心,旨在减少投机行为并有机地培养信徒和长期网络参与者社区。通过确保更高的初始流通量和上限供应量,这种方法将重点更多地放在代币的内在效用和项目的实际潜力上,而不是投机定价。

这一策略有几个主要好处:

  1. 减少投机:有了更高的初始流通量,市场可以根据代币的效用和需求(而不是投机性炒作)更准确地为其定价。

  2. 有机增长:市场衍生的 FDV 培育出一个专注于项目长期成功和效用的社区。

  3. 透明度和信任:通过避免估值过高的陷阱,这种方法可以与社区和利益相关者建立更大的信任,确保未来的道路更加稳定和可预测。

尽管有些人可能认为市场衍生的 FDV 方法可能会导致初始增长放缓或低估的风险,但稳定、可持续的协议的长期利益远远超过这些短期担忧。

区块链领域最近的评论也强调了变革的必要性。例如,Azeem Khan 在 CoinDesk 上发表的一篇文章正确地主张,应放弃虚高的估值,以吸引散户投资者并重振 VC 代币市场。虽然这种观点承认高 FDV 的缺点,但它主要侧重于通过保持较低的估值和制造市场炒作来吸引散户投资者。

然而,这还远远不够。长期可持续的方法不应仅仅降低估值,而应创造真正的价值和效用,让散户投资者和更广泛的社区产生共鸣。重点应放在透明度、现实的估值和促进有机增长上,而不仅仅是眼前的市场兴奋。

构建可持续的区块链生态系统

区块链行业仍处于起步阶段,而如今代币发行的管理方式将决定生态系统的未来。市场衍生的 FDV 方法呼吁其他项目优先考虑透明度、长期效用和社区信任,而不是短期收益。

区块链行业正处于十字路口。继续走低流通量、高 FDV 发行的道路只会导致更多的市场不稳定和投资者的失望。通过采用市场衍生的 FDV 方法,项目可以建立更强大、更具弹性的生态系统,让所有参与者受益。现在是时候让行业专注于打造真正的产品了,而不是专注于下一个闪亮的新代币。

Leituras Relacionadas

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

This weekly analysis outlines a critical juncture for BTC and HYPE markets, focusing on key price level confirmations. **BTC Analysis:** BTC is at a pivotal point after a five-wave rally from the June 5th low of $59,100. The price has broken below a short-term rising channel's lower boundary, with the current move seen as a pullback to test this breakdown. Failure to reclaim this level could lead to a retest of the $59,000-$60,000 support zone. The core scenario hinges on this channel retest outcome. * **Key Levels:** Resistance at $64,500-$65,000 (channel boundary) and $69,500-$70,500. Support at $59,000-$60,000 and $55,000. * **Strategy:** A core bearish stance is maintained (20% short from last week), with short-term plans for tactical trades. Three detailed contingency plans (A/B/C) are provided for short positions on resistance tests or breakdowns, emphasizing strict stop-loss discipline. **HYPE Analysis:** HYPE shows strong momentum but is currently in a corrective phase after hitting a new high of $76.94. The price is retesting the crucial $64-$66 support area. * **Key Levels:** Resistance near $77 and $80-$82. Support at $64-$66 and $52-$54. * **Strategy:** The short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A long position is considered only if clear stabilization signals appear at the $64-$66 or deeper $52-$54 support zones, with tight risk controls. **General Risk Management:** A standardized trailing stop-loss protocol is emphasized: set initial stop, breakeven at +1% profit, then trail stops upward to lock in gains. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as a personal trading framework, not investment advice. Market conditions are complex and require dynamic adjustment.*

marsbitHá 13m

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

marsbitHá 13m

Research Report Interpretation: Citi Attends AWS Summit, Bullish on Cloud Business Acceleration but Data Governance Remains Key Variable

Citi analyst Tyler Radke's team attended the AWS New York Summit (June 17-18), engaging with over 10 clients and partners. In a June 19 report, they highlighted the summit's focus on scaling agent AI for enterprise deployment. Citi maintains a "Buy" rating on Amazon, forecasting AWS revenue growth to accelerate to 37% in FY27 from 30% in FY26, noting this estimate may be conservative. Key takeaways: 1. **AWS Strategy Shift:** AWS is moving from proof-of-concepts to scalable deployment. New offerings like AWS Context (building enterprise knowledge graphs), Amazon Quick (cross-application AI assistant), and security tool Continuum address core enterprise pain points for AI adoption. 2. **Data Infrastructure Beneficiaries:** Data infrastructure companies like Snowflake, Elastic, Oracle, and ClickHouse are seen as direct beneficiaries of scaling AI workloads, as evidenced by strong growth and use cases presented. 3. **Critical Role of Data Governance:** As AI agents scale from hundreds to thousands, effective data governance becomes the key variable for deploying AI in core business processes. AWS Context represents AWS's strategic extension from providing compute/models to offering a data governance infrastructure layer. The report emphasizes that without solving data governance, AI will remain confined to pilot projects. The investment thesis focuses on AWS revenue acceleration and data infrastructure vendors' growth, while monitoring signals like AWS's quarterly revenue growth, Bedrock AgentCore task volume, and pricing impacts on companies like Elastic.

marsbitHá 20m

Research Report Interpretation: Citi Attends AWS Summit, Bullish on Cloud Business Acceleration but Data Governance Remains Key Variable

marsbitHá 20m

Crucial Week of Contention: BTC Tests Support and HYPE's Key Level Battle | Special Analysis

**Market Enters Critical Week: Bitcoin Pullback Test and HYPE Support Battle** The market enters a crucial phase of contention this week. The marginal shifts in Federal Reserve policy expectations continue to dictate the pricing rhythm for risk assets. Meanwhile, in the crypto market, following a period of sideways consolidation, the divergence between bulls and bears is becoming concentrated at key price levels. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis & Strategy** * **Technical View:** The 4-hour chart suggests BTC is in a five-wave structure since the June 5th low near $59,100. Price action shows a short-term rising channel. The recent drop below this channel's lower boundary is now being followed by a pullback attempt (wave 40-41). The outcome of this retest is critical. * **This Week's Outlook:** The core focus is whether BTC can reclaim and hold above the channel's lower boundary. * **Bullish Scenario:** A successful hold could lead to a continued rebound, potentially challenging the $69,500 - $70,500 resistance zone. * **Bearish Scenario:** Failure to hold may trigger a renewed test of the $59,000 - $60,000 core support area, with $55,000 as a deeper support level. * **Operational Strategy:** The author maintains a 20% mid-term short position initiated last week near $64,500, based on a model signaling a shift to a bearish structure. Short-term tactics involve using 30% capital for potential "spread" trades, with three contingency plans (A, B, C) outlined for reacting to resistance tests, breakouts, or support breakdowns. **HYPE Analysis & Strategy** * **Technical View:** On the 4-hour chart, HYPE shows strong momentum, having recently broken to a new high since January. The current pullback presents a clear three-wave correction structure, bringing the price back to the critical $64 - $66 support zone. * **This Week's Outlook:** The focus is on the battle for the $64 - $66 support area. * **Bullish Scenario:** Holding this support could signal a continuation of the uptrend from the June 10th low, leading to new highs. * **Bearish Scenario:** A breakdown could extend the correction, potentially testing the deeper $52 - $54 support band. * **Operational Strategy:** The recommended short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A light long position (under 30% capital) could be considered if HYPE shows stabilization signals at the $64-$66 or $52-$54 support zones, confirmed by model signals. Strict stop-loss discipline is emphasized. **General Risk Management:** A strict trailing stop-loss protocol is advised: set an initial stop; move to breakeven at +1% profit; lock in profits progressively thereafter. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as the author's personal technical perspective and trading log, not as investment advice. Markets are complex and dynamic; risk control is paramount.*

Odaily星球日报Há 20m

Crucial Week of Contention: BTC Tests Support and HYPE's Key Level Battle | Special Analysis

Odaily星球日报Há 20m

AI Agents Also Need 'Credit Checks': ERC-8126 is Filling the Gap in On-chain Trust

The article discusses ERC-8126, a proposed standard designed to address the lack of trust and verification for AI Agents operating on-chain. While ERC-8004 provides AI Agents with a basic on-chain identity (answering "Who are you?"), it does not guarantee trustworthiness. ERC-8126 aims to fill this gap by establishing a verification layer (answering "Are you reliable?"). It standardizes how independent verification providers can assess an agent's associated risks across five key areas: Token/Contract Verification (ETV), Media Content Verification (MCV), Solidity Code Verification (SCV), Web Application Verification (WAV), and Wallet Verification (WV). These providers generate a standardized risk score (0-100) and proofs based on their checks, without acting as a single authoritative certifier. This allows wallets, marketplaces, dApps, and other agents to consume these risk signals—for example, to display warnings, filter listings, or make interaction decisions. The standard also incorporates concepts like Private Data Verification (PDV) and Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP) to allow verification without exposing sensitive underlying data. Positioned alongside ERC-8004 (Identity) and ERC-8183 (Commerce for agents), ERC-8126 represents a step toward building a verifiable and accountable infrastructure for the emerging on-chain AI Agent economy, shifting trust assessment from purely user-based judgment to standardized, consumable signals.

marsbitHá 38m

AI Agents Also Need 'Credit Checks': ERC-8126 is Filling the Gap in On-chain Trust

marsbitHá 38m

Rented Conviction: How Much Real Money Is Behind the Bitcoin ETF Flows

Borrowed Belief: How much of Bitcoin ETF flows are real money? Weekly Bitcoin ETF flows, often interpreted as a measure of institutional conviction, are heavily influenced by a hidden arbitrage trade rather than genuine directional buying. A cash-and-carry arbitrage, where traders buy the ETF while simultaneously shorting Bitcoin futures on the CME to lock in a basis spread (the price difference between futures and spot), drives roughly half of the week-to-week flow volatility. This delta-neutral activity appears as ETF inflows but is unrelated to price views. Data shows a strong correlation (0.70) between weekly ETF inflows and increases in hedge fund short positions on CME futures, while Bitcoin’s weekly price returns have almost no explanatory power. However, this arbitrage activity dominates short-term *fluctuations*, not the cumulative *stock* of investments. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows since launch, only about $1 billion currently represents net arbitrage exposure. The vast majority consists of steady, directional buying averaging around $400 million per week. The arbitrage trade has been unwinding for two years, with hedge fund short positions peaking near $14 billion in late 2024 and declining to ~$4.5 billion. Recent ETF outflows partly reflect this ongoing unwind as the basis compresses, not a loss of faith in Bitcoin. Thus, ETF flows overstate the *volatility* of belief, not its *level*. The headline number is more a gauge of arbitrage desk activity than conviction. For accurate interpretation, monitor the CME basis relative to Treasury yields and hedge fund net shorts—these reveal how much of the reported “demand” is truly directional.

marsbitHá 40m

Rented Conviction: How Much Real Money Is Behind the Bitcoin ETF Flows

marsbitHá 40m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片