背靠10 亿 TG 用户,TON 生态即将爆发？

金色财经Publicado em 2024-08-11Última atualização em 2024-08-11

Bi安平台宣布将上线 TON 代币交易，TON 瞬时暴涨。

TON 公链的诞生可谓一波三折，从 Telegram 在2019年宣布推出 TON，中间经历了与 SEC 的法律争端、社区开发，到今年倍受市场关注，已经历了5年的时间。

目前，TON 公链在 Telegram 的加持下即将爆发，TON 生态将是下一个可以去掘金的新大陆。

一、TON 公链简介

我们先从 Telegram 谈起，Telegram（简称TG或电报），是跨平台的即时通讯软件，支持用户相互交换加密与自毁消息，发送照片、影片等所有类型文件。

Telegram 是除了微信、Facebook、Whatsapp之外，另一个社交应用巨头。

我们可以从月活跃用户来对比看下 Telegram 和微信之间的差距。

根据腾迅第一季度财报数据显示，微信及 WeChat 的月活跃用户数突破了 13.59 亿，而 Telegram 目前拥有的月活跃用户已达到了 9.5亿，Telegram 创始人兼 CEO 帕维尔·杜洛夫（Pavel Valeryevich Durov）在接受采访时表示，希望在一年内达到 10 亿。

目前，Telegram 和微信的活跃用户数量是在同一个量级上，以 Telegram 的发展速度，月活用户数超越微信也不是没有可能。

如果用微信来类比，可以把 Telegram 大概理解为 Web3 版本的微信，使用 Telegram 可以和世界各地的用户进行交流。

介绍完了 Telegram，我们看看 TON 和 Telegram 之间的关系。

2019 年，Telegram 项目方试图推出 TON（Telegram Open Network）公链，但是在 1CO 阶段，美国 SEC 强力介入，在经历了一系列法律争端后，Telegram 不得不放弃该项目。后来，社区和其他开发者接手了 TON 这个项目继续进行开发。

虽然 TON 与 Telegram 没有直接关系，但 Telegram 官方和创始人 Pavel Durov 仍在近年来多次支持该项目，并强调 Telegram 与 TON 的业务关联性。

和其他公链相比，TON 具有天然的优势，因为它的背后有 Telegram 这个月活将近 10 亿的社交巨头，无论是用户还是流量，Telegram 都将会给予 TON 公链以支持。

TON 基金会总裁 Steve Yun 曾经表示，其目标是在 2028 年前吸引 Telegram 30% 的用户加入 TON，预计 TON 在 2028 年的活跃用户将达到 5 亿人。

二、TON 生态发展

在 TON 生态中，DApp 数量已经有 1600多个了。

TON 生态中应用涉及的种类有 Staking、Wallets、Bridges、Social、Gambling、Games、DEX 以及借贷等19个分类，TON 生态基础设施也越来越完善。

根据 ton.app 平台数据显示，TON 公链上的 Jetton 代币（Jetton 是一种实现可替代代币的智能合约，这是以太坊流行的 ERC20 代币标准的 TON 版本）已达到了 200多个（https://ton.app/jettons）。

其中，USDT 在 TON 公链上的发行量已达到了 7 亿多美元，TON 成为发行 USDT 数量仅次于 Solana 的第五大区块链。

TON 生态中最近爆发的游戏赛道明星项目 Notcoin（NOT），目前市值已超过了 10 亿美元。

根据 defillama 平台数据显示，TON 生态 TVL 已从年初的 1.4亿美元增长到目前的 6.1 亿美元，TVL 是年初的 3 倍多，增长非常迅猛。

在 defillama 平台中，一共收录了 TON 生态中的 19 个项目（目前 defillama 收录的比较少，只是很小一部分），其中 TVL 排名最高的是两个 DEX，其中 STON.fi TVL 达到了 2.7 亿美元，其次是 DeDust TVL 也达到了 2.6 亿美元。

随着 TON 生态的发展，基于 TON 发行的 Token 数量也越来越多，这也促进了 TON DEX 交易量的增长。

和其它公链生态一样，TON 也将全方位发展，除了 DeFi 外，GameFi、NFT、RWA 赛道等，也都在快速发展。

三、代币经济学

TON 一开始使用的是 PoW 共识机制，后来改为 PoS 共识机制，TON 代币总的供应量为 50 亿枚，每年增发 0.6%，相当于每年大概增发 3000 万枚左右，这些新增发的代币主要用于奖励表现良好的验证者。

另外，TON 代币的长期持有者，可以把 TON 代币进行质押，可以获得大约 3.73% 的年化收益率，促进更多 TON 代币的持有者进行质押。

TON 持有了 1.45% 的代币，其余 98.55% 已通过早期的 POW 挖矿分发。为了优化代币持有过度集中问题，团队实施了冻结非活跃钱包和以折扣价销售 TON 的措施，有效管理了代币的市场供应。

四、未来展望

TON 背后有 Telegram 这个社交巨头的支持，Telegram 可以为 TON 公链导用户、导流量，这是 TON 公链所拥有的独特优势，在本轮牛市缺乏性感叙事的背景下，TON 公链与社交巨头Telegram 的相互融合，吸引了市场极大的注意。

TON 基金会也在大力发展 TON 公链生态，例如，Telegram 广告平台开放并使用TON 代币支付收入，推出激励计划“The Open League”，分发3000万枚TON代币进行流动性激励，与Tether合作在TON公链上推出USDT稳定币等。

最近随着 Notcoin 的爆发，TON 生态中的 GameFi 项目也越来越多，拥入 TON 生态的开发者、资金也都在增加，涌现的机会也将越来越多，TON 生态值得持续关注。

P.S本文不构成任何投资建议

Leituras Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHá 7h

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHá 7h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Há 7h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Há 7h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHá 10h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHá 10h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Há 11h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Há 11h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHá 12h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHá 12h

Trading

Spot

Futuros