Nexera DeFi项目一年内遭遇第二次黑客攻击

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-08Última atualização em 2024-08-08

币界网报道:

Nexera是一个以去中心化市场为特征的DeFi项目,在过去一年中经历了第二次黑客攻击。该漏洞利用影响了本机令牌NXRA。

Nexera在过去一年中宣布了对其协议的第二次黑客攻击,影响了持有原生NXRA代币的智能合约。这些资金最终都没有进入交易所,因为Nexera立即停止了代币智能合约并冻结了资产。

最近的黑客攻击共影响了4700万个代币,剥削者设法出售了一些资金。后来,3250万NXRA被冻结在黑客的钱包中并被销毁。最初,Cyvers Alert链上的研究人员注意到了这一漏洞。他们警告Nexera,一名剥削者已经更改了其代理合同,并正在移动和桥接代币。

Nexera声称其主要智能合约是可靠的,NXRA代币仍将使用相同的地址。随后,项目团队向所有持有人发出警告,禁止从钱包中批准任何Nexera智能合约。在首次黑客攻击发生24小时多后,发出了撤销Nexera合同访问权限的警告。在产生额外损失之前,必须尽快手动撤销合同访问权限。根据Etherscan的数据,23083名持有者可能会受到影响。

损失估计在44万美元至150万美元之间。NXRA的交易量有限,主要依赖于DEX活动。黑客攻击增加了原生代币的压力,将价格暴跌至0.018美元,然后回升至0.03美元。自漏洞利用以来,NXRA交易已停止,等待对主动风险的进一步澄清。关于该漏洞的完整报告可能需要几天时间,而NXRA将被冻结几天。

黑客成功利用了一个带有代币储备的代理智能合约,耗尽了可用资产。4700万NXRA只是8.5亿代币总供应量的一小部分。然而,其中一些资产被快速出售为ETH,然后在币安智能链上转换为代币。成功售出的代币部分估计为44万美元。

Nexera在第二次黑客攻击后恢复活动

与其他Web3漏洞相比,Nexera黑客攻击的规模相对较小。协议本身并不是直接目标,但黑客试图利用质押智能合约中的一组项目。

引起人们注意的是,Nexera之前也面临过类似的情况。该团队还运营着Alliance Block(ALBT),该公司在2023年初的一份质押智能合约上损失了500万美元的代币。

黑客设法从Bonq借贷协议中提取了1.12亿ALBT,以及50万Binq欧元(BEUR)代币。黑客攻击后,ALBT代币价格暴跌,因为攻击者将资金从Polygon转移到以太坊,意图出售。

在那次黑客攻击之后,Nexera重新命名并发行了新的代币和股票代码。这一次,尽管受到直接攻击,资产仍将保留。

Nexera引起了人们对潜在内幕工作的怀疑,甚至是作为团队一员渗透的黑客的蓄意攻击。链上研究员和分析师@ZachXBT认为,Nexera攻击可能是黑客加入加密货币公司或在采访中注入恶意软件的更大趋势的一部分。研究人员将黑客组织与朝鲜联系起来,目的是窃取有价值的代币,并将其兑换成ETH,以便以后进行混合和交易。

锁定价值和抵押品的存在增加了黑客对Web3项目的破坏。随着DeFi在2024年的复苏,攻击也在加速。7月,几个大型漏洞攻击影响了WazirX、Compound、LiFi和其他平台。

就Nexera而言,直接损失很小,但价值和声誉的损失伤害了多个持有人。甚至有人怀疑Nexera的黑客行为是内部人士所为,旨在为代币回购创造条件。目前,NXRA的所有者仍在试图了解他们的资金是否会被解锁,以及该项目的智能合约是否被认为可以再次安全使用。


Hristina Vasileva的加密货币报道

Leituras Relacionadas

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbitHá 4h

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbitHá 4h

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbitHá 8h

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbitHá 8h

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbitHá 10h

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbitHá 10h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片