DLNEWS 专访 Arthur Hayes: 如果特朗普当选 加密行业会有什么变化?

比推Publicado em 2024-08-08Última atualização em 2024-08-08

作者 | DLNEWS

编译 | 吴说区块链

原文链接:

https://www.dlnews.com/articles/people-culture/arthur-hayes-on-donald-trump-and-gary-gensler-and-blackrock/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=

Arthur Hayes 的第一份工作是在香港的德意志银行交易大厅。2008 年 9 月他入职的那天,雷曼兄弟申请了破产。当时他 22 岁。

高刺激的交易和百万美元奖金的日子戛然而止。

像 Hayes 这样的冒险青年交易员在监管、合规部门和刻板的办公室文化的冲击下被淘汰。

然后他发现了加密货币。

“当我阅读比特币白皮书时,它真的与我的真实理念产生了共鸣——比如腐败的银行系统有多么糟糕,”他告诉 DL News。

快进十年——这一过程中包括共同创立 BitMEX 加密货币交易所并成为亿万富翁,以及在美国认罪和缓刑时间——如今的加密行业开始看起来越来越像他离开的银行业。

包括贝莱德和富兰克林邓普顿在内的金融巨头现在为零售投资者提供便宜且安全的投资加密货币的方式。

富达希望将比特币纳入美国的养老金。

Hayes 说,这依然是那个老行业。

“它仍然具有全球范围内一群非常多样化的人的活力,他们来自金融或技术背景。他们想要一些不同的东西,”Hayes 上周在他位于新加坡的办公室说。

“他们想要一些有无限上涨潜力的东西,显然非常不稳定,如果你不小心很快就会被淘汰。但至少有可能产生极端的产品使用或极端的财富。”

Hayes 拥有加密 OG 的可信度。

他还成为了加密货币及其他领域最多产和最受关注的市场评论员之一。

Hayes 在周一市场崩盘之前与 DL News 聊了聊,谈到选举、金融业对加密货币的接受程度,以及他对比特币价格的看法。

关于选举

AH:他们认为特朗普说了对的话,所以他会更快实现它。不管是特朗普还是哈马斯,都无所谓。

DLN:为什么?

AH:是的,加密货币捐了很多钱。但我不认为你们捐的钱足以超过摩根大通、摩根士丹利、花旗银行、高盛。

而且,如果你想想这些机构的人员构成,都是来自这些银行的人。

所以,虽然特朗普当选并做了这些事情会很好,但我认为他可能会遇到与他第一任期相同的问题。

你可以说这些好听的话并尝试所有这些政策,但如果整个政府组织都反对它们,那么什么也不会发生。

关于比特币和货币政策

AH:无论是特朗普政府还是哈里斯政府都会印钞。他们以不同的方式做这件事。但钱会被印出来。

因此,你的加密货币会涨——路径可能会非常曲折,但归根结底,我们知道它会走向何方。

关于 SEC 主席 Gary Gensler

DLN:美国证券交易委员会主席 Gary Gensler 似乎是这个行业的大恶魔。你同意这些看法吗?

AH:人们混淆了症状和问题本身。你可以听听他的演讲,他是一个非常聪明的人。但当他在政府职位上时,就完全是个笨蛋。

这只是政治。你可以用其他人替换他。Gary Gensler 不是问题。SEC 也不是问题。

解雇 Gary Gensler 并不会有什么效果,如果你不喜欢的那套法规仍然存在,因为你的民选代表选择考虑其他事情而不是为加密货币创建框架。

人们都在为 Gary Gensler 感到愤怒,但他实际上无关紧要。

关于比特币储备的计划

AH:我认为即使特朗普当选,也几乎不可能实现这一点。

你将需要有一定数量的人投票支持这一点,你知道,这会在某种程度上对美国财政部或美联储产生负面影响或影响维持美国国债市场的可见性。

DLN:即使无法实现,你认为这是个好主意吗?

AH:哦,这是个好主意。美国应该在最后削弱美元并购买比特币和黄金。这将解决他们的许多问题。

他们会削弱美元,比特币和黄金将上涨。

我认为美国政府会积极主动地尝试收购比特币吗?高度怀疑。他们会在购买比特币之前先买黄金。

但这是一笔相同的交易。这也是我们这样做的相同动机。

关于贝莱德进入加密领域

AH:加密货币的整个意义在于它没有进入门槛。

贝莱德可以使用比特币,而在菲律宾没有金融服务的人也应该能够使用加密货币。

激励结构是否足够强大?以及区块链如何工作的博弈论和所有这些东西,确保不会发生中心化——如果发生了,有没有相应的后果?

我曾写过一点关于“被动疾病会不会感染加密货币,他们会接管所有的比特币,然后使网络僵化”等等的内容,对吧?

理论上,是的,这可能发生。但这仍然是一个开放的竞争领域。

如果你拥有贝莱德的产品,你拥有的是加密货币的衍生品,你不真正拥有加密货币——贝莱德拥有你的加密货币。

因此,贝莱德的产品对人们来说是很有吸引力的,因为它很方便,但它也不是加密货币。

关于比特币的价格

AH:在这个周期中,比特币的价格将会非常非常高。几十万美元,也许会达到 100 万美元。

有太多的债务需要展期。我们正在进入一个全球货币架构完全改变的时期。

我们不知道它会是什么样子,但过去 80 年里最成功的人们将非常抵制变化。

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Leituras Relacionadas

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbitHá 12m

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbitHá 12m

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbitHá 19m

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbitHá 19m

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbitHá 2h

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbitHá 2h

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbitHá 2h

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片