谁在组织Crypto4Harris虚拟市政厅?

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-07Última atualização em 2024-08-07

币界网报道:

副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯(Kamala Harris)对加密货币的立场相对未知,但一个名为Crypto4Harris的新组织背后的组织者正在推进一项倡议,将持有数字资产的支持者团结在民主党2024年总统候选人的周围。

加密货币倡导者的基层网络将于下周通过Zoom举办一场市政厅活动。与会者将有机会与支持哈里斯入主白宫的行业领袖、政策专家和加密货币爱好者交谈。

距离11月分裂的美国大选还有不到90天的时间,在乔·拜登总统上个月决定不竞选连任之后,加密货币粉丝的动员。与此同时,前总统唐纳德·特朗普在竞选活动中多次发表言论支持加密货币。

Crypto4Harris在推特(又名X)上的账户表示,亿万富翁Mark Cuban是计划参加的“重量级人物”之一。此前,这位投资者和著名的比特币粉丝告诉Decrypt,哈里斯阵营的多名人士向他提出了与加密货币相关的问题,他称之为“一个好兆头”

库班没有立即回应Decrypt的置评请求。

过去几年,拜登政府对比特币矿工征税、5月份否决支持加密货币的决议以及证券交易委员会主席加里·詹斯勒采取的执法行动,对加密货币采取了强硬立场。

特朗普抓住了一些加密货币倡导者所说的全面监管战争。例如,这位前总统在纳什维尔受到了雷鸣般的掌声,当时他告诉比特币用户,如果再次当选,他将“解雇Gary Gensler”,结束“反加密运动”

哈里斯的阵营是否会在加密货币领域翻开新的一页仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。尽管如此,哈里斯最近还是聘请了大卫·普洛夫担任高级顾问。Plouffe曾担任前总统巴拉克·奥巴马2008年成功入主白宫的竞选经理,此前他曾在加密货币交易所币安的全球顾问委员会任职。

“很多仇恨”

Crypto4Harris的主要组织者是在加密货币行业全职工作的志愿者。在接受Decrypt采访时,他们表示,他们希望向人们展示加密货币不是一党制的问题,哈里斯政府不会是拜登政府的延续。

加密数据分析平台Snickerdoodle Labs的首席执行官乔纳森·帕迪拉告诉哈里斯解密公司:“这是一个了解硅谷的人。他明白创新和创业对美国来说是超级关键的。”

经营自己咨询公司的William Schweitzer表示,他是一名民主党战略家,有兴趣向哈里斯竞选团队发出基于加密货币的支持信息。Schweitzer指出,一个公开支持该技术的“左倾人士”联盟表示,Crypto4Harris正在创建一个平台来展示这一信息。

他说:“如果你纵观加密推特领域,你会发现很多人对现任政府的仇恨。”。“这是为了迈出新的一步。”

组织者表示,他们欢迎加密货币领域的任何人加入所谓的“有机联盟”,他们只是从领导的角度代表了其当前的体现。

“政治足球”

众议员Wiley Nickel(北卡罗来纳州民主党)在推特上表示,他期待着在市政厅发表演讲,截至本文撰写时,市政厅已有300名注册人。上周,Nickel告诉Decrypt,有迹象表明哈里斯将作为总司令对加密货币采取“平衡的方法”。

尼克尔周三在推特上写道:“作为民主党人和(卡玛拉·哈里斯)的支持者,我们希望鼓励创新,保护消费者。”。“允许加密货币成为政治足球只会让美国更加落后。”

Nickel没有立即回应Decrypt的置评请求。

投资公司Paradigm的政策主管Justin Slaughter鼓励人们参加市政厅会议,即使他们不支持哈里斯。他在推特上表示,这次活动可能会让人们了解“哈里斯竞选团队对加密货币和技术的持续重置意味着什么”

该活动的宣布在网上遭到了明显的抵制。一位推特用户将其比作龙虾组织沸水活动,而其他人则指出缺乏具体的政策声明,或者Crypto4Harris帐户的数字足迹相对较小。

VanEck的数字资产主管Matthew Sigel在推特上问道:“你很高兴看到一个拥有900名粉丝的账户做出了努力,但没有具体细节吗?”。“这太可悲了。”

Sigel的问题是在回应加密货币创新委员会首席执行官Sheila Warren的推特帖子时提出的,该委员会是一个参与加密货币政策的行业联盟。沃伦曾表示,“加密货币是最终的大帐篷”,Crypto4Harris的外展是本着加密货币包容性的精神,“无论社区的一些人告诉你什么”

沃伦在随后的一篇帖子中写道:“数据显示,加密钱包持有者涵盖了所有人口统计和地理区域。”。“我们的目标应该是与任何愿意开放并寻求教育的人接触,无论其政治派别如何。”

由Ryan Ozawa编辑。

Leituras Relacionadas

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHá 29m

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHá 29m

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbitHá 2h

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbitHá 2h

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbitHá 2h

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbitHá 2h

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbitHá 4h

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbitHá 4h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片