日本央行如何摧毁日元套利交易和加密货币市场?

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-06Última atualização em 2024-08-06

币界网报道:

作者:Alex O’Donnell,CoinTelegraph;编译:邓通,

8 月 5 日,加密货币经历了多年来最糟糕的一天。很少有人预见到这一点,但交易员对杠杆的沉迷已经悄悄地放大了几个月的市场风险。如果杠杆交易是导火索,那么日元的突然上涨就是火柴。幸运的是,火可能很快就会熄灭。

日元贷款成本飙升导致了此次崩盘。现在,随着交易员最终削减杠杆和日元敞口,市场将迎来健康反弹。如果更广泛的市场稳定下来——而且很可能如此——加密货币可能很快就会卷土重来。

廉价借贷

众所周知,加密货币交易并不基于基本面。价格主要由短期机构交易者推动,他们从加密货币的波动中获利。为了提高回报,交易者会利用杠杆或借入资金加倍头寸——通常数额惊人。崩盘前不久,未平仓合约(衡量净借款的指标)接近 400 亿美元。

所有这些借来的钱都必须来自某个地方。最近,那个地方就是日本。2022 年,美国国库券利率多年来首次升至零以上,并持续攀升。在日本,利率保持在最低水平。贸易公司从中获利——借入巨额日本贷款,以低成本为其他市场的交易提供融资。

这似乎是个好时机。到 2023 年,加密货币的牛市全面展开。杠杆交易(可以将收益或损失放大 2 倍或更多)带来了丰厚的回报。与此同时,交易员以日元计价的融资几乎是免费的。

这就是所谓的日元套利交易的本质,而且它并不是加密货币独有的。根据 ING 银行的一份报告,到 2024 年,以日元计价的外国借款人贷款达到约 2 万亿美元,比两年前增长了 50% 以上。

日本 17 年政策的终结

7 月 31 日,一切都发生了变化,日本央行将短期政府债券利率从 0% 提高到 0.25%。(此前,日本央行在 3 月份将利率从 -0.1% 提高,这是 17 年来首次。)这一看似无害的举动引发了一系列事件,最终导致比特币大跌。

甚至传统市场也受到了严重冲击,标准普尔 500 指数(美国股票指数)当天下跌超过 5%。

催化剂并不是日本加息,而是随后发生的事情:外汇市场上日元的飙升。(当国内利率上升时,货币通常会升值。)从 7 月 31 日起,美元兑日元汇率从 1 美元兑 153 日元左右跌至 145 日元。突然之间,以日元计价的贷款变得非常昂贵。

无论是因为贷方追加保证金还是出于谨慎,交易员们开始抛售数十亿美元的头寸。Jump Trading 在 7 月 24 日至 8 月 4 日期间抛售了价值超过 3.7 亿美元的 ETH,这引起了轰动,但并未引发市场低迷。Jump 最多只是加剧了注定要成为历史性抛售的局面。

2024 年 8 月 4 日至 5 日晚上 24 小时的清算数据。来源:CoinGlass

事实上,根据 CoinGlass 的数据,8 月 4 日至 5 日期间,超过 10 亿美元的杠杆交易头寸(代表数十万笔交易)被清算。

强势回归?

对于某些疾病,发烧就是治愈方法。希望市场正在发生这样的事情。交易员们被从高风险杠杆头寸中震出,并最终削减了巨额日元计价的贷款债务。在加密货币方面,净未平仓合约目前为 270 亿美元——比崩盘前减少了近 130 亿美元。

与此同时,荷兰国际集团 (ING) 表示,美元/日元可能已无下跌空间。

如果其他所有方法都失败,那么总会有降息。日本股市 8 月 5 日下跌约 12%——这是自 1987 年以来最大的单日跌幅。这可能迫使日本央行进行干预,减轻借款人的打击。美国的情况可能也会得到缓解,因为 7 月份的一份报告显示失业率急剧上升。

在日本,“如果干预措施奏效——现在是时候了,”Mount Lucas Management 高级投资组合经理 David Aspellh表示。“鉴于美国最近的数据,美联储似乎将比几个月前预想的更积极地降息。”

如果这种情况发生,那么加密货币可能会在夏末反弹。当然,加密货币市场是不可预测的。如果这一切有什么教训,那就是在进行另一次杠杆交易之前要三思而后行。

Leituras Relacionadas

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbitHá 49m

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbitHá 49m

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbitHá 1h

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片