24年投资计划简要

0xSorosPublicado em 2024-08-02Última atualização em 2024-08-02

关于本轮资产配置

单片链:SOL

Thanks for reading 0xSoros’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

模块化:TIA(Layer2项目将使用Celestia的DA层以降低交易成本;)

ZK-Rollup:STRK(七大Layer2同等市值下押注STRK。逻辑有待探究)

价值存储:ETH(买入以太坊作为机动操作,不博新项目的时候持有吃Beta,博新项目的时候卖出以太坊)

核心Alpha在于SOL和TIA

博2-3个1-2亿美金市值的项目

24年开始,处于牛市进程中的早期,满仓操作

关于BTC和ETH

下轮熊首选抄底标的BTC(每一轮熊市都是BTC最抗跌,反弹最强)

一类观点:BTC ETF通过后,只有BTC和其他山寨之分;换言之BTC表现将一直优于ETH

对此观点的个人想法:ETH ETF通过也是板上钉钉的事情(两到三年之内)。ETH叙事逐渐趋同于BTC:价值存储/数字黄金。不用纠结于BTC和ETH的表现差异。长期来看BTC和ETH的表现会不相上下。中短期来看,因BTC ETF已通过,圈外大资金会介入BTC。同时炒作资金流向ETH ETF的预期以及坎昆升级。

民道老师观点:ETH ETF通过,市值要逼近BTC ETF通过时的1T,三倍空间。根据之前数轮周期,ETH都在BTC市值的1/2。乐观的猜想ETH目前还有50%补涨,市值到5000亿美金。

未来预测:24年1月11日BTC ETF通过,作为新一代年轻人的数字黄金,BTC和ETH未来十年内追赶黄金市值,十年十倍收益(两到三轮周期)

关于ETH弱势的观点

对圈内玩家来说,此番言论未免过于刻薄。譬如上轮周期,ETH是后于BTC上涨的。ETH有补涨的历史。24年伊始ETH及生态项目的上涨便证明了这一点。本轮周期,BTC ETF通过,区块链行业正式进入传统金融视野。保守的观点是,在长周期中ETH将趋近于BTC的收益(有可能是跟随BTC,小概率收益率超越BTC)。不纠结的做法是BTC和ETH都配置一些。

关于ETH L2的思考

ARB和OP在ETH上涨阶段可以作为ETH的Alpha。从以太坊全局来说,不得不承认的是L2剥离了ETH的价值。如果ARB和OP没有发币,那么这两个项目作为“ETH Alpha”的涨幅明明可以作为ETH的涨幅。L2生态角度,还未出现亮眼项目(缺失土狗项目,反观Solana链上土狗活跃不断。用事实说话)。总体来说,以太坊依然面临群雄割据的困境。EIP4844未必能根本上的困境。

观察板块和项目

按整个周期算,生态项目跑不过本位币。上轮周期,Solana生态项目都没有跑过SOL。在合适的价格抄底(最好是超跌跌价格错配的情况下),获得超额收益后换成本位币。

Solana生态项目(JUP、BONK、PYTH、JTO、MPLX)

DePin赛道: iot.net(属于Solana生态)

模块化赛道:DYM、

并行EVM:Monad、

Layer2赛道:FUEL、

Restaking赛道: Eigenlayer

跨链(LayerZero、AXL、STG、RUNE、FLIP)

AI(TAO、OLAS、WLD)

Soros 写于24.2月

Thanks for reading 0xSoros’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Leituras Relacionadas

Preferred Stock Is Not the Trigger for Corporate Bankruptcy, MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027

Preferred Shares Are Not the Catalyst for Corporate Bankruptcy; MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027. This article analyzes the nature of preferred shares used by MicroStrategy (MSTR). Legally equity but economically similar to debt, these shares, including its Bitcoin-linked STR convertible preferred notes (STRC), offer fixed or floating dividends. Crucially, MicroStrategy's preferred shares lack rigid redemption clauses, meaning they are not classified as traditional debt. This eliminates principal repayment pressure and means missed dividends do not constitute default or trigger bankruptcy, creating a "self-contradictory virtuous cycle." The article clarifies that if funds are short, MicroStrategy can defer or suspend preferred share dividends (except for non-cumulative types like STRD) without immediate risk. The real potential crisis point lies with its convertible bonds. If a prolonged bear market prevents conversion, MicroStrategy might need to sell Bitcoin to repay these bonds starting from the earliest maturity in September 2027, potentially creating a downward spiral. Preferred dividend suspensions would only exacerbate market panic in such a scenario. Recent financial activity shows MicroStrategy strengthened its position through four weeks of common stock (MSTR) issuances, raising over $851 million without issuing new preferred shares. It increased its dollar reserves to approximately $1.4 billion, which is sufficient to cover all preferred share dividends and interest until around March 2027. While Bitcoin purchases slowed recently, this prioritization of cash reserves enhances the company's near-term financial safety. The analysis concludes that if the Bitcoin bear market ends by early 2025 as anticipated, MicroStrategy can resume issuing MSTR stock in a rising market to replenish reserves and manage future dividend obligations, thereby reducing the long-term pressure from its preferred share structure.

marsbitHá 48m

Preferred Stock Is Not the Trigger for Corporate Bankruptcy, MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027

marsbitHá 48m

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

The article "Giants Launch the Context War, Reconstructing AI's Moat" discusses how leading AI companies—OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google—are shifting their competitive focus from model size to acquiring, managing, and utilizing user context (Context). Initially, Context referred to the length of text a model could process, leading to a "arms race" for longer context windows. However, the competition has evolved through three key phases: expanding text capacity (long context windows), enabling memory across sessions, and finally, integrating AI into real user environments like browsers and desktops to capture dynamic task states. Each company is pursuing a distinct strategy. OpenAI is building Context around the ChatGPT account, turning it into a central hub that accumulates user understanding across various integrated applications and tools. Anthropic, lacking a major user base, focuses on high-value verticals like coding, empowering its Claude model to actively gather Context through GUI interaction (Computer Use) and system connections (MCP protocol). Google, with vast existing user data from products like Search and Gmail, faces the challenge of restructuring this data into actionable, AI-understandable Context for its Gemini model within its ecosystem. The core argument is that the nature of competitive advantage in AI is changing. The internet era prized network effects—connecting more users. The AI era values "individual depth": the ability to build deep, task-specific understanding of a user. This creates a new moat through 1) the compounding value of accumulated Context, 2) deep integration with user tools and permissions, and 3) the establishment of trust for complex tasks. Therefore, the battle for Context is fundamentally about capturing "task entry points" and converting existing digital ecosystems into environments where AI can effectively understand and act, rather than merely scaling user numbers.

marsbitHá 1h

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

marsbitHá 1h

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手Há 9h

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手Há 9h

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbitHá 11h

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbitHá 11h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片