Coinbase 2024 Q2 财报解读:营收 14.5 亿美元,净收入环比下滑 97%

链捕手Publicado em 2024-08-02Última atualização em 2024-08-02

作者:念青,ChainCatcher

 

Coinbase 于今日公布第二季度财报,营收为 14.5 亿美元,环比下降 11%,同比增长超 100%,与分析师预期的 13.7 亿美元几乎持平。净收入为 3600 万美元,环比下降97%。调整后的 EBITDA(税前息前折旧前摊销前利润)为 5.96 亿美元。Coinbase 连续四个季度实现营收正增长。

Coinbase 第二季度总交易量为 2260 亿美元,较第一季度下降了 28%,交易收益为 7.81 亿美元,环比下降 27%,订阅和服务收入增长 17%,至 5.99 亿美元。总运营费用为 11 亿美元,环比增长 26%。Coinbase 第二季度在收入多元化方面取得了不错的进展,订阅和服务收入达到近 6 亿美元。资产负债表增加到 78 亿美元。

值得一提的是,Coinbase 第二季度托管费收入为 3500 万美元,环比增长 7%。主要驱动力是第二季度的平均加密资产价格高于第一季度,也受益于其作为 BTC ETF 产品的托管人的相关资金流入。此外,Coinbase 在二季度产生了 2.4 亿美元的 USDC 稳定币利息收入,环比增长 22%。

Coinbase 还在Q2财报中特别强调了Base在性能方面的较大提升:提速降费——基础费用低于1美分,处理速度低于1秒。Base处理交易量第二季度增长300%。此外,Coinbase 在第二季度还推出了Coinbase Wallet的升级版本的自托管钱包Smart Wallet,以简化用户体验。

收入多元化:交易费收入下降,订阅和服务收入上涨

总体而言,Coinbase 第二季度在收入多元化方面取得了不错的进展。Q2 总交易量为2260亿美元,环比下降28%。总交易费用收入为7.8亿美元,环比下降27%,同比增长138%。收入占比从Q1的65%降低到 54%,但仍为最主要的营收来源。订阅和服务收入达到近 6 亿美元,环比增长 17%。公司利息和其他收入为6970万美元,环比增长40%。

  • 零售交易费

2024 Q2 零售交易费收入为 6.65 亿美元,环比下降 29%,同比上涨 130%。Q2零售交易量为370亿美元,环比下降34%。Coinbase 交易费用直接受到加密市场行情的影响,第二季度加密货币现货市场交易状况比第一季度更加疲软,尤其是在美国。

  • 机构交易费

第二季度机构交易相较第一季度有所放缓。Q2机构交易收入为6400万美元,环比下降25%,同比增长272%。第二季度的机构交易量为1890亿美元,环比下降26%。

第一季度得益于2024 年 1 月比特币 ETF 的获批上市,Coinbase吸引了机构投资者的大量涌入,机构平台 Coinbase Prime 2024 Q1 交易量和活跃客户数量创下历史新高。尽管第二季度交易收入降低,但在7月,以太坊现货 ETF 正式获批,Coinbase 被9只中的8只授权成为托管方,Coinbase机构交易费用收入仍在持续受益于加密 ETF 的上市。

订阅和服务收入

Coinbase Q2的订阅和服务收入为5.99亿美元,同比增长17%。订阅和服务收入受益于更高的USDC平均平台余额和USDC市值以及较高的平均加密资产价格,尤其是SOL和ETH。

  • 稳定币收入为 2.4 亿美元,,环比增长22%。主要驱动力是较高的平均USDC平台余额和较高的平均USDC市值。平台上 USDC的价值为57亿美元,仅比第一季度末的55亿美元增长了2%。
  • 区块链的奖励收入为1.85亿美元,环比增长23%。增长的主要驱动力是更高的SOL和ETH均价。
  • 利息和财务费用收入为6900万美元,环比增长4%。增长的主要驱动力是较高的平均托管法定余额。
  • 托管费收入为3,500万美元,环比增长7%。第二季度增长的主要驱动力是平均加密资产价格高于第一季度。此外,托管费收入的增长同样受益于作为BTC ETF产品的托管人的角色相关的资金流入。
  • 其他订阅和服务收入为7000万美元,同比增长9%,主要由Coinbase One收入的增长推动。

资产负债表

截至第二季度,Coinbase持有78亿美元资产,环比增加10%,即增加了7.33亿美元,具体组成如下图所示。

第三季度展望

Coinbase 第三季度的订阅和服务收入将在5.3-6亿美元之间。2024年7月,Coinbase已创造了约2.1亿美元的交易总收入,表示将继续推动目标的实现。

此外,Coinbase 将在第三季度继续推动 USDC 在全球的采用,使其成为最合规的稳定币。因此Q3与USDC相关的费用将增加。截至第二季度,Coinbase拥有3486名全职员工,同比增长2%。在今年接下来半年里,Coinbase还将持续增加员工,来支持产品开发和国际扩张等业务。

Leituras Relacionadas

DRAM ETF Issuer: Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron All Surpass $1 Trillion, the AI Era of Memory Chips Has Only Just Begun

Authors: Dave Mazza, Thomas DiFazio | Source: Deep Tide TechFlow The article, written by Roundhill Investments (issuer of the DRAM ETF), responds to Morningstar's caution about investing in memory chip stocks. Morningstar warns of the sector's history of boom-bust cycles, a lack of economic moats, and potential momentum-driven overvaluation. Roundhill argues the current situation is structurally different due to AI. Key points in Roundhill's rebuttal include: * **Changed Demand & Supply Dynamics:** AI infrastructure, not consumer electronics, is now the primary growth driver for memory demand. New, strict long-term supply agreements with hyperscalers reflect the high capital intensity of advanced manufacturing. * **Existence of a Moat:** High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), essential for AI, has extremely high manufacturing barriers. The market is dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, with new entrants blocked by technological complexity and long lead times for equipment like ASML's EUV machines. * **Strong Fundamental Outlook:** Analyst consensus projects the three companies will rank among the world's most profitable by 2027, with combined profits of $704 billion on over $1 trillion in revenue. Their operating margins have already reached record highs. * **Valuation Re-rating:** Despite significant stock price gains, memory stocks trade at attractive valuations (e.g., a median NTM P/E of 8.37x for the DRAM ETF) relative to projected explosive EPS growth. Roundhill suggests historical valuation frameworks may no longer apply given the new profitability paradigm. Conclusion: Roundhill contends the rally is justified by fundamentals, marking a structural shift for the memory industry into a new era of sustained, AI-driven demand against constrained supply, rather than a repeat of past cycles.

marsbitHá 8m

DRAM ETF Issuer: Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron All Surpass $1 Trillion, the AI Era of Memory Chips Has Only Just Begun

marsbitHá 8m

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major organizational restructuring, involving a 20% staff reduction (approx. 54 employees) and a division into functional clusters like Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional layers. Co-founder Vitalik Buterin further revealed plans to cut the EF's budget by around 40% over the coming years, aiming to reduce its annual spending rate from about 15% to roughly 5% by 2030, transitioning to an endowment-driven model. This overhaul is seen as a long-overdue correction to the EF's ambiguous role. As Ethereum grew, the foundation faced persistent criticism over ETH sales, perceived lack of execution, and unclear strategy, often becoming a focal point for community frustration amid ETH's price stagnation. The reform aims to redefine the EF's boundaries, narrowing its focus to core protocol research, public goods funding, and ecosystem coordination, while offloading more applied development work to the broader market. Concurrently, ecosystem forces like the newly formed Ethlabs (founded by ex-EF researchers) and other independent groups are stepping in to fill the space, signaling a shift from a centralized model to a more distributed, collaborative ecosystem structure. The move was notably praised by Solana co-founder toly, who viewed a "leaner" EF as potentially more decisive and agile.

Odaily星球日报Há 49m

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

Odaily星球日报Há 49m

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

Dragonfly partner Haseeb explores the distorted economics of AI model pricing, drawing parallels to tax policy. He notes that startups and small teams (under 150 users) enjoy heavily subsidized, fixed-price AI subscriptions (like Claude Code), where the marginal cost of an additional token is effectively zero. This creates a powerful incentive for them to maximize token usage ("token-maxxing") and innovate aggressively with AI automation. In contrast, large enterprises (over 150 users) are forced onto "Enterprise" plans, paying per-token API fees with high (~75%) markups. This acts like a steep "tax" on AI-powered labor, disincentivizing marginal automation and experimental use, and encouraging them to retain more human workers. Haseeb argues this pricing creates a "150-person cliff," a regulatory notch similar to labor laws in France that discourage firms from growing past 50 employees. He predicts the fastest-growing future companies may deliberately cap their headcount at 149 to avoid the punitive enterprise pricing. This would foster an "AI-first" management philosophy obsessed with automation and outsourcing to stay lean. While not intentionally designed, this bifurcated pricing could become one of the most influential de facto tax policies, shaping how AI replaces labor—not through mass layoffs at big firms, but through agile, AI-native startups outcompeting them.

marsbitHá 1h

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

marsbitHá 1h

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

xBubble: Addressing the Structural Gap in the VC-Backed OPC Economy The concept of OPC (One Person Company) is evolving from a buzzword to a significant AI-driven market. While AI coding tools like Replit and Lovable have validated demand from non-technical users wanting to build applications, a key gap remains: the leap from creating a demo to running a stable, evolving business. These tools still require users to manage the development process, including technical judgments for integrations, modifications, and deployments—a major hurdle for OPCs. xBubble, by DAPPOS, tackles this by shifting from "Prompt-to-Code" to "SOP-to-Business." Instead of generating code from instructions, its core is a system of pre-organized SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) that translate business goals—like "sell World Cup merchandise"—into complete, executable workflows. This includes generating cohesive assets, pages, payment systems, and backend logic. The platform is augmented by a network of third-party service providers who handle infrastructure (hosting, domains, payment setup), acting like "on-site service engineers." Users can pay for these services directly with xBubble credits, simplifying onboarding. This ecosystem aims to deliver not just an app, but a complete, modifiable business launch path. xBubble targets a clear OPC segment: small commercial nodes (e.g., creators, merchants) with existing products, customers, or channels, but for whom a full tech team is unjustifiable. Its potential lies in SOPs accumulating expertise from real cases, improving reliability and reducing delivery costs over time. Additionally, its native support for crypto payments caters to global or digital-native OPCs. In summary, as AI democratizes software creation, xBubble's opportunity is to prove that "SOP-to-Business" provides more immediate value for launching a real, operational business than a powerful but unstructured AI coding tool.

链捕手Há 1h

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

链捕手Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片