Pantera 研究:加密行业存在工资差距,女性收入高于男性 15%

比推Publicado em 2024-08-01Última atualização em 2024-08-01

娱乐行业的制作人和导演是女性收入高于男性的唯一其他领域。

撰文:Matt Stephenson、Ally Zach、Nick Zurick

编译:深潮 TechFlow

我们报告了 Pantera Capital 关于区块链行业薪酬的横断面调查结果。该调查共有 502 名普通人群的受访者,是迄今为止同类调查中规模最大的。我们的分析发现,加密行业员工的性别工资差距与一般情况相反——在我们的样本中,女性的收入超过男性。

性别工资差距

方法论

本研究采用两阶段研究设计,以应对多重假设检验和 p-hacking 的潜在问题。前一年调查的初步观察被视为试点研究,为当前研究提供了信息。

试点研究(前一年)

在前一次调查的探索性数据分析中观察到了性别工资差距,但由于多重比较引发的假阳性风险,并未将其报告为发现。这种方法符合避免第一类错误和出版偏见的最佳实践。基于试点数据,我们进行了先验功效分析,以确定今年调查中检测假设效应所需的样本量。这些结果在此呈现。

确认性分析:

当前研究作为确认性测试。这种方法允许更可靠的 p 值解释,因为它不受多重比较或事后假设的影响。

通过采用这种两阶段方法,我们避免了多重比较校正的需要,例如 Bonferroni 方法,这在同时测试多个假设的单个研究中是合适的。相反,我们的方法与预测建模中的「样本外验证」概念相一致,增强了我们发现的稳健性。

这一方法论框架增强了我们结果的有效性,并为加密货币行业研究等探索性领域提供了严格假设检验的模型。

调查方法和结果

数据收集时间为 2024 年 6 月 4 日至 7 月 20 日,通过基于网络的调查问卷进行,问卷通过专业网络(LinkedIn)、社交媒体平台(X)、新闻通讯和电子邮件传播。样本由 502 名自我认定为男性或女性的美国受访者组成。仅全职员工被纳入分析。

对中位数基本工资的分析显示,加密货币公司的女性收入比男性高出 14.67%。女性的中位数基本工资为 172,000 美元,而男性为 150,000 美元,女性的收入相当于男性每赚一美元就赚 1.15 美元。

这一差异在统计上显著(Mann-Whitney U 检验,p < 0.05),与一般劳动市场趋势相反,后者女性通常收入低于男性。通过回归分析,我们还观察到平均差异有利于女性(p < 0.05)。

这一结果挑战了性别工资差距的叙述,在非加密公司中,女性通常每赚一美元男性只赚 $0.84 美元。

进一步分析

更仔细地检查职业群体,娱乐行业的制作人和导演是女性收入高于男性的唯一其他领域。虽然其他高学位职业的薪酬接近平等,但现实是,即使在 Web2 技术行业,男性的收入仍然显著高于女性。

这种反向工资差距可能部分归因于性别之间经验水平的差异。加密行业的女性往往经验更丰富,通常处于中级到高级职位,当前职位的工作经验超过五年。相比之下,更多男性占据入门级职位,因为他们正在向加密行业过渡。

这种「反向」工资差距可能表明,与传统领域相比,加密行业为女性提供了更好的机会。

需要认识到,女性在这一行业中仍然可能面临障碍和困难。然而,加密行业相对公平的薪酬表明,性别平等正在朝着更大的方向发展,标志着这一新兴领域的进步趋势。

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Leituras Relacionadas

20 Billion Valuation, Alibaba and Tencent Competing to Invest, Whose Money Will Liang Wenfeng Take?

DeepSeek, an AI startup founded by Liang Wenfeng, is reportedly in talks with Alibaba and Tencent for an external funding round that could value the company at over $20 billion. This marks a significant shift, as DeepSeek had previously relied solely on funding from its parent company,幻方量化 (Huanfang Quantitative), and had resisted external investment. The potential valuation would place DeepSeek among the top-tier AI model companies in China, comparable to competitors like MoonDark (valued at ~$18 billion) and ahead of recently listed firms like MiniMax and Zhipu. The funding—which could range from $600 million (for a 3% stake) to $2 billion (for 10%)—is seen as a move to secure resources for model development, retain talent, and support infrastructure needs, particularly as competition in inference models and AI agents intensifies. Both Alibaba and Tencent are eager to invest, not only for financial returns but also to integrate DeepSeek into their broader AI ecosystems. However, DeepSeek’s leadership is cautious about maintaining independence and may prefer financial investors over strategic ones to avoid being locked into a specific tech ecosystem. Alternative options, such as state-backed funds, offer longer-term capital and policy support but may come with slower decision-making and potential constraints on global expansion. With competing AI firms accelerating their IPO plans, DeepSeek’s window for securing optimal terms may be narrowing. The final decision will reflect a trade-off between capital, resources, and strategic independence.

marsbitHá 1h

20 Billion Valuation, Alibaba and Tencent Competing to Invest, Whose Money Will Liang Wenfeng Take?

marsbitHá 1h

After Losing 97% of Its Market Value, iQiyi Attempts to Use AI to Forcefully Extend Its Lifespan

After losing 97% of its market value since its 2018 peak, iQiyi is aggressively pivoting to AI in a desperate attempt to survive. At its 2026 World Conference, CEO Gong Yu announced an "AI Artist Library" with over 100 virtual performers and a new AIGC platform, "NaDou Pro," promising faster production and lower costs. This shift comes as the company faces severe financial distress: its market cap sits near delisting thresholds at $1.36 billion, with significant losses, declining membership revenue, and depleted cash flow. The AI strategy has sparked controversy. Top actors have issued legal threats against unauthorized digital replicas, while in Hengdian, over 134,000 background actors are seeing their already scarce job opportunities vanish as AI replaces them for background roles. iQiyi's move represents a fundamental shift from being a high-cost content buyer to a landlord" to becoming a "platform capitalist" that transfers production risk to creators. This contrasts with competitors like Douyin (TikTok's Chinese counterpart), which is investing heavily in *real* actor-led short dramas, betting that authentic human connection retains users better than AI-generated content. The article draws a parallel to the 1920s transition to "talkies," which made cinema musicians obsolete but ultimately enriched the art form. In contrast, iQiyi's AI drive is framed not as an artistic evolution but as a cost-cutting measure that could degrade storytelling, replacing genuine human emotion with algorithmically calculated stimulation and potentially numbing audiences' capacity for empathy. The core question remains: can a company focused solely on financial survival preserve the art of storytelling?

marsbitHá 1h

After Losing 97% of Its Market Value, iQiyi Attempts to Use AI to Forcefully Extend Its Lifespan

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片