TON-Trust 钱包整合, TON 价格创下新高

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-01Última atualização em 2024-08-01

币界网报道:

v2-a12883c0547c7ca4a9d1d270de92660a_720w.webp

由于多头忽略了影响比特币和大多数顶级山寨币(如狗狗币、柴犬币和比特币现金)的广泛修正,Toncoin 的价格大幅上涨。

此次价格上涨发生在今天晚些时候美国联邦公开市场委员会 (FOMC) 会议之前。FOMC会中一致投票决定将基准隔夜借款利率维持在5.25%至5.50%之间。并考虑到自周一以来价格波动剧烈,必须为 FOMC 会议后的一些波动做好准备。

TON 与 Trust Wallet 宣布整合

Trust Wallet 于 7 月 30 日宣布与 Toncoin 合作进行战略整合。这将使 Trust Wallet 用户能够与 Telegram 生态系统无缝交互。

v2-88364f327f77d08f17a49315f17811bf_720w.webp

TON 区块链为 Telegram 生态系统提供支持,通过 web3 计划引领去中心化。TON 是业内发展最快的网络之一,汇集了项目创始人、开发者和用户。

Trust Wallet 是一款领先的移动加密钱包,提供对各种加密货币和 NFT 的安全存储、购买、兑换和管理。它简化了用户与去中心化应用程序(DApp) 的交互,并支持多个区块链,使其成为加密爱好者的多功能工具。

合作优势

此次合作将有助于两个项目进一步发展和成长。Trust 拥有超过 1 亿的用户群,他们现在可以在钱包中使用 TON 生态系统。这一举措符合 Trust 钱包对开源解决方案的承诺。他们的使命是为 Web3 爱好者提供安全且用户友好的体验。

另一方面,TON 生态系统将能够吸引 Trust 钱包用户。Trust 钱包已经支持 60 多个链,Ton 现在将成为其中之一。这种整合是两个项目的自然发展,因为它们拥有共同的社区友好方法。这种合作旨在增强跨链互操作性。这将使用户能够在 Web3 空间中安全地转移资产

拓展视野

此次合作的关键点在于 GameFi 和去中心化应用的重点。利用 Telegram 庞大的用户群,此次整合有望为 Web3 生态系统带来数百万新用户。Trust 钱包的用户将可以访问 TON 的小程序、GameFi 和 DeFi 应用。这将为新老 Web3 用户带来新的机会。

此次合作不仅将改善用户与 TON 的互动,还将在不久的将来支持将 TONKeer 钱包导入信托钱包。

Trust 钱包致力于开源解决方案。他们通过发布兼容 ERC-4337 的智能钱包 Barz 为其承诺奠定了坚实的基础。这将帮助开发人员克服限制和钱包挑战。

TON 价格上涨

Toncoin 价格最终在 6.5 美元处获得支撑,该区域由上升趋势线支撑,这让多头得以推动趋势逆转。在 TON 创下 8.28 美元的历史高点后,交易员一直在与强劲的下行趋势作斗争。

移动平均线收敛散度 ( MACD ) 和相对强弱指数 (RSI) 发出的看跌信号迫使交易员做空 Toncoin。自 7 月初以来,RSI 一直在中性区域持续下行。

如果价格在本周末稳定在趋势线上方,看涨势头可能会增加,从而有可能突破 7.5 美元的阻力位,随后迈向 10 美元。 MACD 可以在日线图上确认买入信号并催化上升趋势。要利用该指标来衡量 Toncoin 价格,交易者必须先确认蓝色 MACD 线在总体上升趋势中穿过红色信号线至中性区域,然后再下达买入订单。

v2-2efa45422a4c31d6933ae6a862d5e7b0_720w.webp

最初,7.5 美元是主要盈利目标。但是,如果价格超过这一水平,Toncoin 可能会反弹至 8 美元,甚至进入探索阶段,目标是创下历史新高。

未来计划

此次整合将为两个项目开辟许多途径,以扩展其产品并利用彼此的力量。TON 社区现在可以使用 Trust 钱包功能并存储他们的代币。另一方面,Trust 钱包用户现在可以访问 TON 的 GameFi 和迷你应用程序。这对项目及其社区来说是一个双赢的局面。此次合作将重新定义 Web3 格局。这不仅会为用户带来新的机会,也会为开发者带来新的机会。

通过此次整合,Trust 钱包和 TON 致力于增强其产品,旨在创建一个更具包容性和可访问性的 Web3 生态系统。

简单来说

通过上述Ton 区块链与 Trust Wallet 之间战略合作等因素可以表明交易者兴趣上升对 TON 产生积极影响,同时价格上升截止撰写本文时价格为 6.8 美元。并且多头瞄准历史新高使Toncoin 的趋势逆转无视市场看跌力量,看涨势头增加预计后续会突破 7.5 美元的阻力位随后或将迈向历史新高

Leituras Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHá 2h

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHá 2h

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手Há 3h

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手Há 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片