【比推每日新闻精选】美联储维持利率不变,鲍威尔称九月份降息“可能在考虑之中”;Tether 上半年利润创历史新高,达 52 亿美元,美国国债持有量创历史新高;Meta 旗下元宇宙部门 Reality Labs 第二季度运营亏损 44.9 亿美元

比推Publicado em 2024-07-31Última atualização em 2024-07-31

比推小编每日为您精选的Web3新闻:

美联储维持利率不变,符合市场预期】

比推消息,美联储周三公布利率决议,美联储连续第八次将基准利率维持在5.25%-5.50%区间不变,符合市场预期。

【美联储主席鲍威尔:九月份降息“可能在考虑之中”】

比推消息,美联储主席鲍威尔发言表示:“我们正逐渐接近可以降低利率的时机。总体来看,我们正在逐渐接近,但尚未达到那个点,九月份降息“可能在考虑之中”,委员会的共识正逐渐接近于降息”。

【市场押注美联储9月降息的概率为100%】

比推消息,据CME“美联储观察”数据:美联储9月降息25个基点的概率为90.5%,降息50个基点的概率为9.5%。美联储到11月累计降息25个基点的概率为21.7%,累计降息50个基点的概率为71.1%,累计降息75个基点的概率为7.2%。

Tether上半年利润创历史新高,达 52 亿美元,美国国债持有量创历史新高】

比推消息,Tether 发布 2024 年第二季度财报,数据显示其 2024 年上半年利润创历史新高,达 52 亿美元,净营业利润达到 13 亿美元,这是 Tether 有史以来最好的业绩。此外,Tether 的美国国债持有量超过 976 亿美元也创下历史新高。

此外,流通中的 Tether 代币储备总额为 118,436,336,293 美元,发行 Tether 代币的公司负债总额为 113,101,998,938 美元,其中 112,395,445,973 美元与发行的数字代币有关。

该集团表示,并未考虑将其支持发行代币的部分储备金用于可持续能源、比特币挖矿、数据、人工智能基础设施、P2P 电信技术、神经技术、教育和其他长期专有投资。

Meta旗下元宇宙部门 Reality Labs 第二季度运营亏损 44.9 亿美元】

比推消息,Meta 周三公布了2024年Q2财报,旗下元宇宙业务 Reality Labs 部门运营亏损44.9亿美元,市场预期亏损45.3亿美元,上年同期2.76亿美元。Meta Platforms 2024年Q2营收390.7亿美元,市场预期383亿美元,上年同期319.99亿美元。

Meta 表示,对于Reality Labs部门,仍然预计2024年将出现亏损。

Taiko澄清:没有任何 Taiko 实体向以太坊基金会发送过任何代币】

比推消息,基于 zkRollup 的以太坊 Layer2 网络 Taiko 在 X 平台表示:“在最近发生的一系列媒体文章中,有文章称以太坊基金会通过出售代币抛弃了 Taiko,我们对此类文章的发布方式表示不满,因为它们在发布前没有尝试联系 Taiko 进行核实。没有任何 Taiko 实体向以太坊基金会发送过任何代币。

我们要强调的是,Taiko 与以太坊基金会保持着紧密的合作关系,因为我们是第一个 Base Rollup。从一开始,我们就一直秉持着这样的理念,并且不会改变。事实上,在最近的 EthCC 活动中,在 Vitalik 的一次主题演讲中,我们被贴上了‘ EVM 纯粹主义者’的标签,这进一步证实了 Taiko 与以太坊基金会之间的联系”。

【富达在伦敦证交所上市实物比特币 ETP】

比推消息,富达国际(Fidelity International)在伦敦证券交易所(London Stock Exchange)上市实物比特币 ETP。


了解更多资讯欢迎加入:

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

比推 Btok 订阅: https://btok360.com/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Leituras Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHá 3h

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHá 3h

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手Há 4h

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手Há 4h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片