美联储将举行年内第五次议息会议

币界网Publicado em 2024-07-30Última atualização em 2024-07-30

币界网报道:

7月30号到31号美联储将举行年内第五次议息会议,这次意义非凡

全世界各国都在屏着呯吸盯着美联储此次议息会议是否会宣布降息,包括美国CNN与美联社在内的等世界顶级预测机构都从以下三大原因一致预测美联储这次议息会议宣布降息是大概率事件。

第一、是美国那六月份CPI创下了自2021年三月份以来的新低,降到了3%,这足以表明美国内的通胀已经控制住

第二、是欧洲银行六月份宣布了降息,利率降至4.25%,如果美联储还是维持5.25%到5.5%的基准利率的话,欧洲各国的资金都会流进美国赚取利率差,光凭支付利息这一项足可以让美国自己喝一壶。

第三、是美国经济增长明显放缓了,今年第一季度美国实际GDP按年利率计算仅仅涨了1.3%,因为5.5%的利率太高了,美国内企业与百姓都不敢贷款投资或消费,严重拖住了美国内经济发展后腿.

综合以上所述,美联储这次议息会议宣布降息的概率很大,或者只是时间上的问题而已,估计在八月份或九月份中旬。

那么如果美联储此次按这些顶级预测机构那般宣布降息的话,对我们都有哪些影响呢?

第一个毫无疑问就是汇率,美元降息,人民币对美元就会升值。股票、债券、房产等人民币资产同时也会随之升值。

再者就是进出口,美元降息对我们进口有明显的好处,因为进口商品便宜了,但对出口有利有弊。经济将会逐步恢复,这有利于我们出口,但人民币升值了,我们出口的竞争力会下降。对于国内那些有美债的企业,因美元降息后货币贬值,还债压力会随之减轻

最后对我们国内的股市或银行及国内的投资和消费都有很明显利好因素。当美元降息后,很多资金会从美国银行流入全球各国的股市。同时,我们也有了再次降息的空间,国内银行就能减少存款,增加贷款,可以通过货币政策刺激消费,治理通胀,从而减缓通缩的压力。

最后是美元降息后人民币资产升值就会吸引外资援助,这对于国内那些成长型的科技企业将是一大利好。

最重要的是利好btc,增加市场流动性,btc会水涨船高

总之是好事

Leituras Relacionadas

STRC 跌破面值,比特币财库实验进入下半场

The price of STRC, Strategy's dividend-paying preferred stock, has fallen below its $100 face value, triggering a re-evaluation of the "bitcoin treasury" corporate model. This highlights a critical tension: the company's asset base consists of high-volatility, non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin, while its capital structure requires continuous cash payouts for dividends and interest. The decline of STRC signals that market pressure is shifting from asset price volatility to the pricing of the company's financing tools. Strategy's core model involves a three-step conversion: turning equity into Bitcoin exposure, converting Bitcoin holdings into capital market credit, and packaging non-yielding BTC into cash-paying securities like STRC. While Strategy holds a massive 847,363 BTC, the focus is now on cash flow mismatches. The company faces annual preferred stock dividend obligations of approximately $1.7 billion, far exceeding the cash flow from its legacy software business. Its ability to meet these obligations relies on continued access to capital markets. The market is now scrutinizing which of three potential costs becomes untenable first: rising dividend costs to attract investors, dilution costs from issuing more common stock, or the reputational cost of selling BTC—a move contrary to its "hodl" narrative. For the broader crypto market, a constrained Strategy means the potential loss of a predictable, narrative-driven marginal buyer for Bitcoin. The STRC discount serves as a reminder that the longevity of such models depends not just on Bitcoin's price, but also on financing windows, cash reserves, and investor willingness to pay a "trust premium" for the structure.

marsbitHá 30m

STRC 跌破面值,比特币财库实验进入下半场

marsbitHá 30m

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手Há 1h

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手Há 1h

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbitHá 2h

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片