早报 | 传特朗普已与马斯克讨论加密货币 哈里斯顾问或已与Coinbase、Circle接触

币界网Publicado em 2024-07-28Última atualização em 2024-07-28

币界网报道：

头条

▌知情人士：特朗普已与马斯克讨论加密货币政策

知情人士透露，特朗普已经与特斯拉CEO埃隆·马斯克讨论了加密货币政策。他还在自己的海湖庄园接待了加密矿业公司的高管，并发誓要减轻Ross Ulbricht的刑期。Ross Ulbricht因运营暗网市场丝路而被判无期徒刑，该网站为确保匿名性，在设计上只允许透过Tor访问，并仅以比特币作为交易介质。最重要的是，特朗普的竞选团队在5月份表示，将开始接受数字资产的捐赠。据一位不愿透露姓名的竞选助手透露，从那以后，他们已经从各种数字代币中筹集了400万美元。

▌消息人士：哈里斯顾问已与Coinbase、Circle等加密公司接触

消息人士称，哈里斯竞选团队的顾问一直在与加密行业的主要参与者联系，以建立最终可能为监管框架提供信息的关系。报告称，最近几天，这项外联工作包括加密货币交易所Coinbase、稳定币公司Circle和区块链支付公司Ripple Labs。消息人士称，哈里斯想要传达的信息是，民主党人是“亲商业、负责任的企业”。

行情

截至发稿，据Coingecko数据显示：

BTC最近成交价67794美元，日内涨跌幅+0.1%；

ETH最近成交价3241.37元，日内涨跌幅-0.6%；

BNB最近成交价580.73美元，日内涨跌幅+0.4%；

SOL最近成交价184.41美元，日内涨跌幅+1.2%；

DOGE最近成交价0.1312美元，日内涨跌幅-1.8%；

XPR最近成交价0.5964美元，日内涨跌幅-0.7%。

政策

▌参议员Cynthia Lummis将提出让美国财政部购买100万枚比特币的法案

The Block报道，参议员Cynthia Lummis表示，她将于下周提出一项法案，指示美国财政部在五年内购买100万枚比特币（价值约690亿美元）。她表示，此举是为了抵消美元贬值的影响。

特朗普：若当选总统将解雇现任SEC主席

美国前总统特朗普在比特币2024会议上表示，其当选总统后将解雇现任SEC主席Gray Gensler，对加密行业的迫害将结束。

比特币政策小组建议英国保留比特币持有量

比特币政策组织向英国发出警告，建议英国不要出售其持有的 61,000 枚比特币。该组织认为，保留这些比特币对英国的经济战略和未来金融稳定至关重要。比特币政策组织在信中强调，保留英国的比特币持有量可以增加国家财富，并对冲未来经济的不确定性。 此外，信中还呼吁采取支持性政策，促进比特币行业在英国的发展。建议包括创造一个有利的监管环境，确保比特币企业获得银行服务，并对比特币开采进行可行性研究，作为英国净零目标的一部分。比特币政策小组声称，这些措施不仅将保护英国比特币资产的价值，还将使英国成为数字经济的领导者。

特朗普再一次承诺将为丝绸之路创始人Ross Ulbricht减刑

美国前总统特朗普在比特币2024会议上表示，其再一次承诺当选总统后将为丝绸之路创始人Ross Ulbricht减刑。

参议员Cynthia Lummis将提出让美国财政部购买100万枚比特币的法案

The Block报道，参议员Cynthia Lummis表示，她将于下周提出一项法案，指示美国财政部在五年内购买100万枚比特币（价值约690亿美元）。她表示，此举是为了抵消美元贬值的影响。

    区块链应用

    ▌Base生态链游Fren Pet拟对游戏、代币经济学、激励机制等进行重大更新

    Base 生态链游 Fren Pet 于 X 发文表示，团队正在对该游戏、代币经济学、激励机制和用户体验设计进行重大更新，将在未来 10 天内推出一些新功能。 对于最大的变化，如激励和游戏内代币经济学，团队将首先制定一个详细的提案，以获得社区的反馈。

    加密货币

    ▌SOL跌破180美元

    行情显示，SOL跌破180美元，现报179.98美元，日内跌幅达到1.17%，行情波动较大，请做好风险控制。

    特朗普：永远不要卖掉你的比特币，当选后将阻止美国政府出售比特币

    美国前总统特朗普在比特币2024会议上表示，“永远不要卖掉你的比特币，当选后将阻止美国政府出售比特币。”

    特朗普：比特币对美元没有威胁，未来的威胁来自华盛顿特区

    美国前总统特朗普在比特币2024会议上表示，比特币对美元没有威胁，那些认为比特币对美元构成威胁的人完全搞错了。未来的危险不是来自加密货币，而是来自华盛顿特区。

    TRUMP跌破6美元

    行情显示，TRUMP跌破6美元，现报价5.95美元，24小时跌幅达12.1%，行情波动较大，请做好风险控制。

    重要经济动态

    ▌分析师：PCE数据为美联储晚些时候降息开了绿灯

    金融投资服务公司 eToro 分析师 Bret kenwell 表示，美国 6 月份 PCE 报告基本符合经济学家的预期，而核心 PCE 指数同比增幅仅略高于预期。尽管如此，报告中没有任何迹象表明通胀会意外加速。加上本月早些时候低于预期的 CPI 报告和最近较低的通胀数据趋势，这应该给美联储在本季度晚些时候降息开了绿灯。在下周的美联储会议上，所有的目光都将转移到鲍威尔身上，人们希望并预期他将为 9 月份的降息奠定基础。近年来，美联储一直非常透明，提前很长时间公布其行动，增加了更多的确定性，而市场喜欢确定性。

      百科

      ▌什么是比特币鲸鱼？

      比特币鲸鱼是拥有大量比特币的个人或组织，他们能够通过交易策略影响市场。“比特币鲸鱼”一词通常用于表示与较小参与者相比拥有大量比特币的持有者，这些参与者在市场中通常被称为“小鱼”。由一个实体控制的钱包或钱包集群的所有者可能是个人或一个正在汇集资金进行大型投资的团体。他们的大量资产是通过采矿、早期投资和其他方法积累的。 鲸鱼可以持有大量比特币，这使他们有能力通过大量资产购买或出售导致价格波动来操纵市场。 在加密货币领域，大量的鲸鱼和极端的波动性经常联系在一起。

      免责声明：作为区块链资讯平台，所发布的文章内容仅供信息参考，不作为实际投资建议。请大家树立正确投资理念，务必提高风险意识。

      Leituras Relacionadas

      Anthropic Employees Leave to Start a Business, Valued at $1 Billion, Also Focused on 'Recursive Self-Improvement'

      Former Anthropic employees Behnam Neyshabur and Harsh Mehta have founded a startup named Mirendil, securing $200 million in seed funding at a $1 billion valuation from investors including Andreessen Horowitz, Kleiner Perkins, and NVIDIA. The company, staffed by researchers from Anthropic, xAI, Google DeepMind, and OpenAI, aims to accelerate scientific discovery by focusing on "recursive self-improvement" for AI. Their vision, described as "AI for AI for Science," is to build a platform enabling research labs in fields like medicine and materials science to develop and iteratively improve their own specialized AI models, rather than relying on general-purpose models from large tech firms. Neyshabur argues this approach, involving AI that can optimize its own code under human supervision, is the fastest path to AI-accelerated science. The founders believe a market opportunity exists because major AI companies, while increasingly using AI to advance their own research, restrict external developers from using their models to train competing products. Mirendil plans to release its first models soon to gather early user feedback, with the goal of empowering thousands of labs to tackle critical scientific challenges.

      marsbitHá 22m

      Anthropic Employees Leave to Start a Business, Valued at $1 Billion, Also Focused on 'Recursive Self-Improvement'

      marsbitHá 22m

      Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

      Franklin Templeton has filed to launch two ETFs that embed a "default configuration" logic into Bitcoin investment, aiming to tap into massive pension fund flows. These "Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETFs" will initially hold 95% equities and 5% Bitcoin, automatically reinvesting stock dividends to buy Bitcoin. However, a quarterly rebalancing rule forces selling of Bitcoin if its allocation exceeds 5%, capping its maximum holding at 20%. While the product cleverly circumvents advisor reluctance and compliance hurdles by labeling itself as a U.S. equity product, its actual Bitcoin buying power is minimal. Given low dividend yields (e.g., ~1% for broad market indices), annual Bitcoin purchases from a fund the size of Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF would be a mere $3.6 million—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. Crucially, during bull markets, the fund becomes a programmed, passive *seller* of Bitcoin, potentially creating sustained sell pressure if many similar funds emerge. The strategy leverages investor inertia and automatic enrollment, similar to the success of target-date funds in 401(k) plans. It also uses an offshore Cayman subsidiary for holding Bitcoin and raises a tax complication where investors must pay taxes on dividends they never receive as cash. Although recent U.S. regulatory changes allow crypto in retirement plans, widespread adoption as a default option faces legal hurdles. The core premise remains: the system doesn't need to convince anyone to buy Bitcoin actively; it simply relies on people doing nothing.

      marsbitHá 31m

      Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

      marsbitHá 31m

      Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

      Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Major Bull Loses $15 Billion On June 25th, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a low of $58,030—its lowest level since October 2024. The sell-off triggered over $1 billion in leveraged liquidations in 24 hours, with longs accounting for $788 million. This marks a more than 53% decline from the October 2025 all-time high of $126,198. A critical factor in the downturn is the weakening position of MicroStrategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. With 847,363 BTC at an average cost of $75,651, the company now faces over $14.6 billion in unrealized losses. Its core financing flywheel—raising capital to buy Bitcoin—is stalling. Its variable-rate preferred shares (STRC), a key fundraising tool, have fallen 25% below their $100 target. This raises doubts about its ability to continue providing steady institutional demand for Bitcoin. Simultaneously, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing significant outflows, with a single-day net outflow of $469 million on June 24th. This represents the most severe sustained capital flight since their launch. The macroeconomic backdrop remains restrictive, with persistent inflation delaying expected Fed rate cuts. Analysts note a shift in capital allocation, with institutional funds moving away from crypto towards AI infrastructure stocks. Immediate pressure comes from approximately $10 billion worth of Bitcoin options expiring on June 26th, which could increase market volatility. The combined effect of these factors—eroding core demand pillars, macro headwinds, and capital rotation—has decisively broken the $60,000 support level.

      Foresight NewsHá 37m

      Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

      Foresight NewsHá 37m

      STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

      The article analyzes whether the STRC (a perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy) presents a buying opportunity after its price fell below its $100 par value to around $80, offering a seemingly high yield of 13-15%. The core argument is that STRC's discount reflects market skepticism about the sustainability of MicroStrategy's capital structure model, not just temporary panic. This model relies on issuing securities (like STRC) to raise funds to buy more Bitcoin, a "flywheel" that works in a bull market. The recent small sale of BTC to fund dividends, while minor, broke the psychological "never sell" anchor and signaled potential strain. Key risks identified are not a traditional Ponzi collapse but a potential breakdown in the financing narrative: 1) If Bitcoin enters a deep bear market, crushing MicroStrategy's stock premium (mNAV), its ability to raise cheap capital weakens. 2) If STRC remains deeply discounted, it signifies permanently higher funding costs. 3) The high cash dividend yield represents a significant ongoing expense. 4) If selling BTC to pay dividends becomes routine, the bullish narrative reverses. The conclusion is that STRC is not a risk-free high-yield asset. It is a high-coupon bet on whether MicroStrategy's BTC treasury financing model can withstand a bear market. Buying it is a wager that the market will continue to believe in and fund this structure at acceptable costs. The current price asks if this cycle's "casualty" might be a BTC treasury company's融资 model itself.

      marsbitHá 53m

      STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

      marsbitHá 53m

      Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

      **Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Names?** In the crypto world, changing a project's name is common—over 16% of projects have done so, including major ones like Polygon (formerly Matic Network). This contrasts sharply with traditional businesses, which fiercely protect brand equity. The core reason is that in crypto, brand loyalty is often weak. Users are frequently investors, airdrop hunters, or yield seekers, not traditional consumers. A name associated with price crashes, hacks, or failed narratives becomes a liability, not an asset. Renaming can be a strategic reset to shed this baggage. Name changes serve as a potent marketing tool. They can signal a genuine pivot in strategy or scope (e.g., EthSign dropping "Eth" as it expanded). However, they are often used to "narrative surf," rebranding to align with hot trends like AI, RWA, or the metaverse (e.g., Elrond → MultiversX). Critically, renaming is also a PR tactic to distance a project from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap → Multichain). The most significant risk emerges when a name change is coupled with a token migration or swap. This process can allow projects to reset exchange price charts, erase visible historical downtrends, and create an illusion of a fresh start. It often facilitates liquidity resets, where low float can be exploited for pumps. More alarmingly, migrations sometimes mask overhauls to tokenomics, introducing substantial new token supply through "ecosystem funds" or "node rewards," effectively diluting existing holders. The fundamental issue isn't renaming itself, which can be valid for strategic evolution. The problem is when it functions as an escape from history—a way to avoid accountability for past mistakes, failed promises, and poor performance. When a project announces a rebrand, the critical questions are: What tangible new capability or strategy does it represent? Has the tokenomics changed? And what part of its past is it most trying to make users forget?

      marsbitHá 59m

      Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

      marsbitHá 59m

      Trading

      Spot
      Futuros
      活动图片

      Categorias popularesright-arrow

      Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow