真人玩家在 Bot 遍地的链游中还能保持竞争力吗?

深潮Publicado em 2024-07-26Última atualização em 2024-07-26

链上游戏必须接受机器人作为用户群的一部分。

撰文:WMP, Bankless

编译:Felix, PANews

链上游戏吸引了一类极其高效的玩家:机器人。当机器人参与其中,真人玩家还能保持竞争力吗?

完全链上游戏将一切(包括资产、逻辑、规则和状态)直接放在底层区块链上。在这个新的游戏领域,每个举动最终都被记录在链上。

这种功能提供了各种好处,例如透明度和围绕新颖游戏经济的可能性。然而,这也吸引了一类极其高效的玩家类型:机器人。

真人在链上游戏有竞争力吗?

最近,风投公司 Nascent 联合创始人 Dan Elitzer 在 X 上问道,「是否有可能制作出一款完全链上的游戏,让没有辅助的真人也能在其中竞争?」

Elitzer 在 plotchy 的推文中提出了这个问题。plotchy 是 Nascent Security 的安全研究员,plotchy 已在游戏 Kamigotchi 的排行榜上占据了主导地位(Kamigotchi 是一款全新的完全链上 RPG 类游戏)。

尽管 Kamigotchi 早期的测试网智能合约未经验证且是闭源的,但 plotchy 还是设法对游戏架构进行了逆向工程,并创建了一个索引器来解析其数据。

通过访问详细的游戏信息,包括 Kami 宠物的位置和健康状况,plotchy 随后编写了一个机器人来追捕其他 Kami,并开始迅速登上游戏排行榜。

鉴于这种操作,plotchy 一直在与 Kamigotchi 团队进行讨论,后者一直在不断进行迭代。玩家也在调整游戏风格以更好的生存。团队为此引入了一项新任务,引导玩家协作对抗 plotchy 的宠物军队。

尽管如此,链上游戏中的机器人仍然存在。

Kamigotchi 的开发者之一 lethe 在推文中指出,链上游戏必须接受机器人作为用户群的一部分,因为游戏具有开放性,而团队的挑战在于对游戏设计进行调整,以平衡这种状况。

也就是说,团队的最终目标是创建一个游戏环境,让真人玩家和机器人玩家能够共存,既有趣又不会让真人玩家感到难以忍受。那么,在实现这种平衡方面,链上游戏的未来会是什么样子呢?

至于如何减少那些部署了许多机器人并通过自动账户群操纵游戏的用户,反女巫措施可能会越来越多地被采用。

可以肯定的是,女巫攻击仍然是加密领域的一个悬而未决的问题,没有完美的解决方案。然而,一些个人身份证明技术的组合,如通过社交媒体注册、社区报告计划和 AI 分析,可能会在抑制链上游戏中的机器人群方面卓有成效。

另一方面,对抗机器人的另一种策略是正面对抗。正如作者以前的同事 FaultProofBen 最近所说,「在链上游戏中对抗机器人的最佳方法是加入公会。」

FaultProofBen 也知道这一点,他是 WASD 的创始人,这是加密领域最大的链上游戏公会。当你拥有一大群紧密合作的真人玩家时,你就拥有了一支可以与机器人玩家抗衡甚至更好的战斗力量。

当然,如果无法打败他们,那就加入他们吧。FaultProofBen 还预测,「机器人的使用将变得民主化,非技术玩家也可以使用。」想想游戏插件或服务之类的东西,它们让所有玩家都可以轻松优化游戏玩法。至少,这种方法有助于创造公平的竞争环境。

链上游戏仍处于发展初期,因此该领域现在正在努力应对机器人也就不足为奇了。当作者在玩《Fall Guys》或《Overwatch》等主流游戏时会遇到机器人,这些游戏在更封闭的轨道上运行,机器人只是游戏中的一个范例(无足轻重)。

然而,作者不认为因 Bot 的存在,而永远将链上游戏定位为小众游戏。随着这个领域的成熟,进步和创新将有助于削弱机器人玩家的主导地位,以便真人玩家仍然能够蓬勃发展。未来还有很多挑战,个人对未来持乐观态度。

Leituras Relacionadas

Never expected that the first tangible application of AI x Crypto is in security auditing

Unexpectedly, the initial major application of AI in the Crypto sphere has turned out to be security auditing. In 2026, DeFi has faced significant security challenges, with 121 hacking incidents resulting in approximately $942 million in losses. While AI was expected to first impact areas like quantitative trading, its initial breakthrough has instead transformed security auditing by drastically lowering the cost and skill barrier for finding smart contract vulnerabilities. The traditional audit model is facing obsolescence. Advanced AI models, such as Claude Mythos, enable attackers to scan thousands of contracts and identify vulnerability patterns at scale, compressing the time from discovery to execution to mere minutes. This renders the month-long validity of traditional audit reports ineffective. Notably, attacks now frequently target well-audited, established protocols by exploiting business logic flaws, operational security weaknesses, and even years-old historical contracts, demonstrating that old audit reports offer zero protection. This pressure is forcing a fundamental shift in the industry. In the short term, a wave of defensive re-auditing is occurring, driven by projects seeking to meet new AI-era security standards and regulatory requirements. In the long run, audit firms' business models are diverging. The one-time report delivery model is declining in value, as evidenced by platforms like Code4rena shutting down. Leading firms are now pivoting towards AI-powered defense, integrating continuous monitoring, real-time on-chain risk detection, and embedding security directly into the development phase, as seen with tools like OpenZeppelin's Skills system. Ultimately, the era of "audit once, secure forever" is over. Security must become a continuous, embedded infrastructure investment for projects. For audit companies, survival depends on proactively transforming from traditional service providers into platforms offering AI-native, ongoing security solutions.

链捕手Há 8m

Never expected that the first tangible application of AI x Crypto is in security auditing

链捕手Há 8m

Who's Paying for the $64 Billion Paper Feast?

"The Illusion of Wealth: Who Bears the Burden of the $64 Billion Paper Bonanza?" Bitcoin recently broke below the critical $60,000 support level, triggering significant selling by major holders. While the price drop itself is concerning, a deeper issue lies with publicly traded companies that have bet their entire balance sheets on Bitcoin, creating a precarious financial link between their stock prices and crypto valuations. Leading the pack is Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), holding 847,000 BTC at an average cost of ~$75,600, now facing over 20% unrealized losses. Its stock trades at a deep discount to its Bitcoin holdings. Other companies like Japan's Metaplanet (nearly 40% unrealized loss) and Solmate (which fully pivoted to Solana and saw its stock collapse 98%) illustrate the risks of this model without underlying business operations. A key misconception is that these firms face immediate, forced liquidation. Their debt structures provide a buffer. However, the core "financial flywheel" is stalling. Strategy's CEO has even hinted at potentially selling Bitcoin to cover obligations—a reversal of his long-standing "never sell" doctrine. New accounting rules (ASU 2023-08) exacerbate the problem, requiring quarterly mark-to-market adjustments. Bull markets create paper profits, attracting capital. In bear markets, they generate massive paper losses, potentially triggering index exclusions and forced selling by passive funds. The true crisis point is not the current price, but a looming debt reckoning. If Bitcoin fails to recover above key cost bases within 12-24 months, convertible note redemption windows opening in Fall 2027 could force companies to sell massive Bitcoin holdings for cash, potentially triggering a severe liquidity crisis. The model hasn't eliminated risk; it has merely transformed instant, price-triggered liquidation into a slow-burning, time-triggered debt crisis.

marsbitHá 18m

Who's Paying for the $64 Billion Paper Feast?

marsbitHá 18m

Base Halts for Two Hours: A Single Invalid Block Reveals the Centralized Reality of L2s

Base, an Ethereum Layer-2 Rollup, experienced a two-hour network outage starting around 00:03 UTC on June 26. The halt was caused by a consensus issue that led to an invalid block being sequenced, which prevented the generation of new blocks after block 47806542. The team identified the problem, restored block sequencing by 01:51 UTC, and confirmed full recovery of ecosystem infrastructure synchronization shortly after. This incident highlights the operational reality for many L2s: while they leverage Ethereum for security and data availability, their day-to-day usability heavily depends on their sequencer and internal systems. Base employs a high-availability sequencer system with one active leader, but this setup did not prevent the outage when a consensus-level problem arose. This follows a previous 33-minute outage in August 2025 related to a faulty sequencer handover process. The downtime occurred near the scheduled activation window for the "Beryl" network upgrade, which has since been postponed. Beryl introduces the native B20 token standard, among other improvements. The incident has sparked renewed discussion about Base potentially launching its own network token in the future, shifting the conversation from mere speculation to questions about how a token might relate to sequencer decentralization, governance, and accountability in such failure scenarios.

Foresight NewsHá 38m

Base Halts for Two Hours: A Single Invalid Block Reveals the Centralized Reality of L2s

Foresight NewsHá 38m

Trading

Spot
活动图片