山寨收获之后要转换到BTC和ETH才是王道AVAX崛起

金色财经Publicado em 2024-07-08Última atualização em 2024-07-08

大家不在认所谓的VC,Meme币上涨的内在逻辑,未来长期谁有概率胜出 这一轮投资者不再盲目追逐VC投资的公链代币和具有实际技能性的代币。投资者对VC的运作手法有了更深入的了解,他们开始避免被割韭菜,转而将资金投入更具潜力的领域,如BRC-20、SOL土狗以及MEME迷因币! 

近期关注AVAX,W,简单说说逻辑。

AVAX

167f346807ce421eaff1d1ca3ca3e440.jpg?638515546662

 Avalanche 以其速度和环保协议而著称,该协议允许高效的去中心化应用程序。最近的发展表明该代币吸引了新的兴趣和投资。此外,该项目有效托管去中心化金融(DeFi)应用程序的能力确保了它仍然是主流。

Avalanche 的高吞吐量、可扩展性和可靠性打造了一个强大的平台。平台支持开发用户友好的应用程序,例如 LiveDuel 的体育博彩平台。这一战略实用性提高了 AVAX 在更广泛市场中的知名度和采用率。它还展示了其超越传统加密货币交易的功能。 

 Avalanche 目前价格为 34 美元,较过去 24 小时上涨 5.79%。此外,其价格在过去一年中飙升了 132%,表现优于其他顶级加密资产的 59%。该代币的交易价格高于其 200 天简单移动平均线,并且与最初的代币销售价格相比,表现出积极的表现。

与此同时,围绕 Avalanche 价格预测的情绪显示出积极的态度。此外,恐惧与贪婪指数显示为56(贪婪)。最近的市场情绪表明,该代币有望实现增长,并突破显着的价格水平。

 W 

1c67d327847b4aa386250922e5e5f49b.jpg?638515546663

W继续保持稳定增长,今天交易价格为 0.53 美元。此价格反映了过去 24 小时内上涨 7%。这使其成为当今市场上涨幅最大的代币之一。过去一周,它在图表上稳步攀升,显示出强劲的势头。 

分析预计 5 月底前将进一步飙升,潜在价值为 0.79 美元。这种价值的飙升归功于虫洞的日益普及。上个月,该代币在 Solana 上以 SPL 格式提供,在以太坊和 EVM L2 上以 ERC-20 格式提供。 这种扩张有助于增强其流动性,这一点反映在其市值和排名上。

目前,Wormhole 的交易价格高于 200 日移动平均线。它也是 Solana 货币和代币领域的顶级代币。此外,代币预测表明它将保持上涨。恐惧与贪婪指数为 74(贪婪),表明投资者对该代币充满信心。

3a196da0d8e445ceafbcae241db659e6.png?638515545050

我们得到的最大的结论就是,散户越多的地方,越容易被割韭菜:比如 ARB 等,解锁越少的项目容易翻车,比如最近上的新币: ENA  ETHFi 等,反倒是几乎全解锁的项目,越容易拉盘,比如: PEPE turbo 如今比特币价格已经接近50万人民币一枚,而以后的价格将会越来越高。

 在持续攀升的过程中,散户对购买比特币的欲望持续降低,因为实在是太贵了,大部分普通投资者仅能买入一两枚,所以只能靠不断的买入山寨币来满足自身的投资需求,这种情况将会持续下去。直到有一天比特币价格越来越高,而大多数没有实际价值的山寨币价格萎靡,大多数人才如梦初醒。

 很多人发现今年在山寨币上赚钱的难度大大提升,所谓春江水暖鸭先知,项目方和交易所早已认识到在比特币etf通过后市场正规化后山寨币的生存环境将会进入良币驱逐劣币的过程,所以大多数上涨的币手法基本一样,持续拉升,不给散户上车机会,高位横盘下跌套牢追高的,或者是散户车重的币,直接横盘出货,某安交易所也在不断的上新加速收割市场散户份额。

5a7ebef08a514daab49fd4cf491af551.jpg?638515546664

BTC扮演者涨服你的角色,而MEME扮演者爆发力强的角色。 所以狗狗未来还会稳定爬升,空间先不说,但是到前高问题不大,etf通过,已经象征行的市场正规化,狗狗币仍然能在市场中有一席之地进入大众视野,所以我们可以预知推特应用狗狗币作为支付手段就是为doge的持续拉升做好了基础。 

 综上所述,您的投资策略应该是在山寨币上获利后转换成比特币(美元霸权的金融手段)或者能具有实际大规模商用价值的币种,这样看起来是比较具有长期意义的投资。而一味的在山寨之间追逐,难免会马失前蹄。

文/我是周悦盈

Leituras Relacionadas

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton has filed to launch two ETFs that embed a "default configuration" logic into Bitcoin investment, aiming to tap into massive pension fund flows. These "Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETFs" will initially hold 95% equities and 5% Bitcoin, automatically reinvesting stock dividends to buy Bitcoin. However, a quarterly rebalancing rule forces selling of Bitcoin if its allocation exceeds 5%, capping its maximum holding at 20%. While the product cleverly circumvents advisor reluctance and compliance hurdles by labeling itself as a U.S. equity product, its actual Bitcoin buying power is minimal. Given low dividend yields (e.g., ~1% for broad market indices), annual Bitcoin purchases from a fund the size of Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF would be a mere $3.6 million—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. Crucially, during bull markets, the fund becomes a programmed, passive *seller* of Bitcoin, potentially creating sustained sell pressure if many similar funds emerge. The strategy leverages investor inertia and automatic enrollment, similar to the success of target-date funds in 401(k) plans. It also uses an offshore Cayman subsidiary for holding Bitcoin and raises a tax complication where investors must pay taxes on dividends they never receive as cash. Although recent U.S. regulatory changes allow crypto in retirement plans, widespread adoption as a default option faces legal hurdles. The core premise remains: the system doesn't need to convince anyone to buy Bitcoin actively; it simply relies on people doing nothing.

marsbitHá 8m

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

marsbitHá 8m

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Major Bull Loses $15 Billion On June 25th, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a low of $58,030—its lowest level since October 2024. The sell-off triggered over $1 billion in leveraged liquidations in 24 hours, with longs accounting for $788 million. This marks a more than 53% decline from the October 2025 all-time high of $126,198. A critical factor in the downturn is the weakening position of MicroStrategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. With 847,363 BTC at an average cost of $75,651, the company now faces over $14.6 billion in unrealized losses. Its core financing flywheel—raising capital to buy Bitcoin—is stalling. Its variable-rate preferred shares (STRC), a key fundraising tool, have fallen 25% below their $100 target. This raises doubts about its ability to continue providing steady institutional demand for Bitcoin. Simultaneously, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing significant outflows, with a single-day net outflow of $469 million on June 24th. This represents the most severe sustained capital flight since their launch. The macroeconomic backdrop remains restrictive, with persistent inflation delaying expected Fed rate cuts. Analysts note a shift in capital allocation, with institutional funds moving away from crypto towards AI infrastructure stocks. Immediate pressure comes from approximately $10 billion worth of Bitcoin options expiring on June 26th, which could increase market volatility. The combined effect of these factors—eroding core demand pillars, macro headwinds, and capital rotation—has decisively broken the $60,000 support level.

Foresight NewsHá 14m

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Foresight NewsHá 14m

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

The article analyzes whether the STRC (a perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy) presents a buying opportunity after its price fell below its $100 par value to around $80, offering a seemingly high yield of 13-15%. The core argument is that STRC's discount reflects market skepticism about the sustainability of MicroStrategy's capital structure model, not just temporary panic. This model relies on issuing securities (like STRC) to raise funds to buy more Bitcoin, a "flywheel" that works in a bull market. The recent small sale of BTC to fund dividends, while minor, broke the psychological "never sell" anchor and signaled potential strain. Key risks identified are not a traditional Ponzi collapse but a potential breakdown in the financing narrative: 1) If Bitcoin enters a deep bear market, crushing MicroStrategy's stock premium (mNAV), its ability to raise cheap capital weakens. 2) If STRC remains deeply discounted, it signifies permanently higher funding costs. 3) The high cash dividend yield represents a significant ongoing expense. 4) If selling BTC to pay dividends becomes routine, the bullish narrative reverses. The conclusion is that STRC is not a risk-free high-yield asset. It is a high-coupon bet on whether MicroStrategy's BTC treasury financing model can withstand a bear market. Buying it is a wager that the market will continue to believe in and fund this structure at acceptable costs. The current price asks if this cycle's "casualty" might be a BTC treasury company's融资 model itself.

marsbitHá 29m

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

marsbitHá 29m

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

**Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Names?** In the crypto world, changing a project's name is common—over 16% of projects have done so, including major ones like Polygon (formerly Matic Network). This contrasts sharply with traditional businesses, which fiercely protect brand equity. The core reason is that in crypto, brand loyalty is often weak. Users are frequently investors, airdrop hunters, or yield seekers, not traditional consumers. A name associated with price crashes, hacks, or failed narratives becomes a liability, not an asset. Renaming can be a strategic reset to shed this baggage. Name changes serve as a potent marketing tool. They can signal a genuine pivot in strategy or scope (e.g., EthSign dropping "Eth" as it expanded). However, they are often used to "narrative surf," rebranding to align with hot trends like AI, RWA, or the metaverse (e.g., Elrond → MultiversX). Critically, renaming is also a PR tactic to distance a project from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap → Multichain). The most significant risk emerges when a name change is coupled with a token migration or swap. This process can allow projects to reset exchange price charts, erase visible historical downtrends, and create an illusion of a fresh start. It often facilitates liquidity resets, where low float can be exploited for pumps. More alarmingly, migrations sometimes mask overhauls to tokenomics, introducing substantial new token supply through "ecosystem funds" or "node rewards," effectively diluting existing holders. The fundamental issue isn't renaming itself, which can be valid for strategic evolution. The problem is when it functions as an escape from history—a way to avoid accountability for past mistakes, failed promises, and poor performance. When a project announces a rebrand, the critical questions are: What tangible new capability or strategy does it represent? Has the tokenomics changed? And what part of its past is it most trying to make users forget?

marsbitHá 36m

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

marsbitHá 36m

A Trillion-Dollar Entry Point for Pension Funds? Franklin's Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETFs Come with a Built-In Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton filed for two ETFs on June 18 that embed a "default option" logic into Bitcoin investing. These funds—the Franklin US Equity Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETF and the Franklin US Innovative Equity Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETF—aim to automatically allocate a portion of investor dividends to Bitcoin, initially with a 95% stock and 5% Bitcoin allocation. The mechanism is designed for financial advisors, not retail investors. By packaging Bitcoin exposure within a standard equity fund label, advisors can bypass internal compliance restrictions against direct cryptocurrency allocation for their clients. Dividends from the stock holdings are automatically used to buy Bitcoin via spot ETFs, futures, or options. However, the structure imposes strict rebalancing rules: if Bitcoin's allocation exceeds 5%, it is trimmed back to 4.5% quarterly, with a hard cap of 20%. This means the fund becomes a systematic seller during Bitcoin price rallies. Realistically, the potential buying pressure is minimal. Based on dividend yields (approximately 1.05% for broad market, 0.52% for innovative equity), the annual inflow into Bitcoin would be a tiny fraction of the fund's assets. For comparison, Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF ($359 million AUM) would generate only about $3.6 million in annual Bitcoin purchases—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. The innovative equity fund, heavily weighted in low-dividend stocks like Nvidia, would have even weaker buying power. The product utilizes an offshore Cayman subsidiary to hold Bitcoin, a common compliance tactic for commodity exposure in mutual funds. A key drawback for investors is the tax liability: they must pay taxes on dividends that are automatically converted into Bitcoin, requiring out-of-pocket cash for a gain they never directly receive. For the strategy to scale significantly, such funds would need to become a default or near-default option in retirement plans like 401(k)s. Recent regulatory moves, including a Trump executive order and a Department of Labor proposal offering fiduciary safe harbors for including crypto assets, could pave the way. However, widespread employer adoption likely awaits further legal clarity. Ultimately, the fund's model leverages investor inertia and automated systems, rather than convincing anyone to actively choose Bitcoin. While it creates a new, albeit small, structural buyer, its rebalancing rules also establish a built-in "selling ceiling" that could dampen price upside if similar products proliferate.

Foresight NewsHá 38m

A Trillion-Dollar Entry Point for Pension Funds? Franklin's Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETFs Come with a Built-In Selling Pressure Ceiling

Foresight NewsHá 38m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片