CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-05-14Última atualização em 2024-05-15

Resumo

The House is set next week to vote on a wide-ranging bill to set crypto regulations, though its potential in the Senate remains murky, despite the optimism of its proponents.

The result of next week's expected vote on U.S. legislation to regulate the cryptocurrency industry will strongly influence the odds the U.S. Senate gets on board, said Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee and a leading advocate for crypto legislation in the waning months of his career in Congress.

The thing to watch, he suggested, is if a lot of Democrats show up to support the bill.

McHenry, who is set to retire at the end of the year, has made digital assets legislation a top priority for the end of his time on Capitol Hill. To that end, the House has recorded a number of recent cryptocurrency successes, from the passage of several relevant bills through McHenry's committee to the advancement of a congressional effort to overturn Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) crypto accounting policies.

But chief among the House's digital assets endeavors is the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act, or FIT21, which is heading toward a long-awaited vote for final approval in the House of Representatives in the coming days. That's the most comprehensive U.S. crypto bill to move this far through Congress and, if it's approved in a bipartisan vote in the House, will represent a high-water mark for the industry's efforts in Washington.

Advertisement
Advertisement
10

"We will have this bill on the House floor next week for a vote," McHenry said at the DC Blockchain Summit on Wednesday. "The outcome of that vote will dictate what kind of attention it'll get in the Senate and whether or not we can get something done."

However, the bill isn't expected to find a ready match in the Senate, so far, meaning it wouldn't immediately be on a path to become law. However, McHenry suggested "who knows what's going to happen" in the so-called lame-duck session of Congress between the November election and the end of the session, when legislation has a way of hitching a ride on unrelated bills.

Rep. French Hill (R-Ark.), who heads a crypto subcommittee and is among the candidates who could replace McHenry in his chairman seat, said at the same event on Wednesday that he's optimistic about the outcome of the House vote on FIT21. One of the big reasons: 21 Democrats chose to vote in favor of overturning the SEC's controversial crypto accounting provision – Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121, or SAB 121 – despite President Joe Biden's threat to veto the effort.

"I'm optimistic, and I expect strong Democratic support," Hill said of the FIT21. "This one is about the future."

Hill said it also answers President Biden's executive order from earlier in his term that called for legislation in this space.

Advertisement
Advertisement

McHenry agreed that getting so many Democrats to buck the White House and SEC on the accounting rule was "a significant thing." At least one Senate Democrat – New York's Kirsten Gillibrand – has said she'll support the resolution to overturn the bulletin when it comes up for a vote on Thursday.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手Há 28m

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手Há 28m

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

The article discusses how companies in the AI era are competing for talent through strategic "title arbitrage," or the renaming of key roles to reflect and attract new, high-value capabilities. It uses Palantir's creation of the "Forward-Deployed Engineer" (FDE) as a prime example. This title reframed client-facing technical work from a peripheral "implementation" role into a core, high-status engineering function. The move was strategic, allowing Palantir to attract talent that blended technical skill with business acumen and to dominate the market's perception of this capability. The piece argues that job titles are an organizational language that signals the value and authority of certain work. Effective new titles, like "Data Scientist" or "Site Reliability Engineer," emerge when a role's strategic importance genuinely outgrows its old name. Conversely, mere title inflation without substantive change is ineffective. For AI companies, particularly in B2B, this is a crucial strategy. AI transformation creates new high-leverage roles (e.g., "Legal Engineer," "GTM Engineer") that combine domain expertise with technical automation. By naming these roles, a company can help clients internally legitimize these change-makers. This, in turn, builds market mindshare, associating the company with the new capability. In conclusion, as AI blurs the lines between product and service, the ability to accurately name and organize the critical, client-adjacent work that defines product learning will be a key competitive advantage. The first to define this new organizational language plants a flag in the market's mind.

marsbitHá 1h

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片