一周代币解锁预告:ARB解锁约23.9亿美元代币

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2024-03-10Última atualização em 2024-03-10

Resumo

ARB将解锁约23.9亿美元代币,APT、CYBER解锁占比超6%。

下周, 8 个项目迎来代币解锁事件。ARB 将解锁约 23.9 亿美元代币,此外 APT、CYBER、APE 将有高比例解锁,其余项目解锁比例与金额均较小。

具体解锁详情如下:

一周代币解锁预告:ARB解锁约23.9亿美元代币

Arbitrum

项目推特:https://twitter.com/arbitrum

项目官网:https://arbitrum.io/

本次解锁数量: 11.1 亿枚

本次解锁金额:约 23.9 亿美元

Arbitrum 是以太坊 Rollup ,旨在提高以太坊的可扩展性,它在向以太坊主网提交单个交易之前聚合和处理链下交易。这意味着用户可以享受更快、更便宜的交易,同时仍然受益于以太坊网络的安全性和去中心化。Arbitrum 的原生代币为 ARB。 ARB 持有者可以参与决策过程,例如对协议升级或变更提出提案和投票。

本轮解锁将面向两类对象,分别为团队和顾问的 6.735 亿枚,价值约 14.5 亿美元,以及投资者的 4.38 亿枚,价值约 9.42 亿美元。

具体释放曲线如下:

一周代币解锁预告:ARB解锁约23.9亿美元代币

Aptos

项目推特:https://twitter.com/Aptos_Network

项目官网:https://aptosfoundation.org/

本次解锁数量: 2481 万枚

本次解锁金额:约 3.36 亿美元

Aptos 是 Layer 1 公链项目,其目标是建设一个可扩展、安全、可信任和可升级的智能合约平台。Aptos 团队由前 Meta 成员独立出来的。APT 为 Aptos 主链的原生代币,用于支付交易手续费、验证抵押及治理。

本次解锁主要面向核心贡献者和投资者,将向前者分配 1188 万枚 APT,价值约 1.57 亿美元,向投资者分配 842 万枚 APT,价值 1.11 亿美元。其余部分为社区的 321 万枚和基金会的 133 万枚。APT 初步进入膨胀加速期,今年仍将有持续相似量级的解锁。

具体释放曲线如下:

一周代币解锁预告:ARB解锁约23.9亿美元代币

CyberConnect

项目推特:https://twitter.com/CyberConnectHQ

项目官网:https://cyberconnect.me/

本次解锁数量: 88 万枚

本次解锁金额: 1061 万美元

CyberConnect 是一种基于区块链技术的去中心化社交图谱协议。CyberConnect 构建了一个统一的社交图谱,用户可以将自己的身份信息、社交关系等迁移到不同的网络和平台,同时这些个人数据也完全归用户所有,从而为用户创造价值。CyberConnect 协议的治理代币是 CYBER,用例包括投票治理,支付 Gas 费等。

本次释放主要面向生态发展基金,释放金额为 821 万美元,其余为面向社区财库的 185 万美元。CyberConnect 今年将保持相同的释放速率解锁,因当前已流通代币占比仅 20% ,故或将带来持续性的抛压。

具体释放曲线如下:

一周代币解锁预告:ARB解锁约23.9亿美元代币

ApeCoin

ApeCoin(APE)是 APE 生态系统的 ERC-20 实用与治理代币,用于支持去中心化的 APE 社区的建设。

APE 由 ApeCoin DAO 管理,得到 APE 基金会的支持。借助 APE,代币持有者可以对 DAO 中的治理提案投票,并使用 APE 生态系统的独家功能(如游戏、活动和服务)。

项目推特:https://twitter.com/apecoin

项目官网:https://apecoin.com/

本次解锁数量: 1560 万枚

本次解锁金额: 3463 美元

本轮释放面向较多,包括创始人、贡献者、慈善贡献、财库等共 6 类对象。Aptos 当前已解锁量占总量的 62.05% ,本年将保持类似的速率持续释放,构成小量抛压。

具体释放曲线如下:

一周代币解锁预告:ARB解锁约23.9亿美元代币

Leituras Relacionadas

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

"Rented Faith: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money?" Bitcoin ETF inflows are often seen as a barometer of institutional conviction. However, week-to-week analysis reveals they are primarily driven by a hidden arbitrage trade rather than directional bullishness. This is the cash-and-carry trade: buying the ETF while simultaneously shorting Bitcoin futures on the CME to lock in the price difference (basis). This delta-neutral activity registers as ETF inflows but reflects a rate-seeking, not price-betting, strategy. Data shows weekly ETF flow volatility is closely tied to hedge fund ("leveraged funds") short positions on CME futures, with a correlation of 0.70. About half of weekly flow variation can be explained by this single factor. In contrast, Bitcoin's weekly price changes have no statistically significant power to predict flows. Crucially, while this arbitrage trade dominates weekly *fluctuations*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the ~$55 billion total net inflow, the estimated net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The vast majority is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week. Thus, ETF flows overstate the *volatility* of belief, not its *level*. The "rented" arbitrage capital churns, while "owned" directional capital forms the bedrock. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for two years, with hedge fund shorts peaking at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and falling to ~$4.5 billion. Recent outflows align with basis compression, signaling the trade's exit, not a loss of faith. For Ethereum ETFs, the same dynamic is weaker due to negative carry from forgone staking yield. The key takeaway: To interpret ETF flows, watch the basis vs. Treasury yields and CME hedge fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the weekly "demand" headline is driven by rented, rate-seeking capital versus real conviction.

链捕手Há 16m

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

链捕手Há 16m

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

Title: Two Giants "Credit" Surge: Loan Balances of 99 Billion vs. 146 Billion USD, Brazil Emerges as Main Battlefield Summary: The article compares the rapid expansion of credit businesses by two major e-commerce and fintech players, Sea (via Monee) and Mercado Libre (via Mercado Pago), in overseas markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America, contrasting with a slowing domestic Chinese credit market. Using Q1 2026 financial data, it highlights their significant growth. Sea's Monee reached a loan balance of $99 billion, up 71% year-over-year (YoY), contributing 17.5% to Sea's total revenue. Mercado Pago's loan balance hit $146 billion, up 87% YoY, contributing 45% to its parent company's revenue. Both maintained stable risk metrics (e.g., Monee's 90+ day NPL at 1.1%) despite rapid scaling. Brazil is identified as a key and accelerating growth market for both. Sea's Brazilian operations saw loan volumes exceed $10 billion, growing 250% YoY, with SPayLater GMV penetration still low (~10%) indicating high potential. Sea also secured a key Brazilian financial credit license (SCFI). Mercado Libre's Brazil segment contributed over half (54%) of total group revenue, with its credit business there generating $11.24 billion in revenue, up 89% YoY and accounting for 12.7% of global revenue. Mercado Pago's credit portfolio, especially credit cards (46% of loans, +105% YoY), is a strategic focus, described as crucial as building logistics was a decade ago. Its net interest margin after loss (NIMAL) remains high at 17.8%. The article concludes that while Brazil presents immense opportunities, the success is largely driven by these integrated "e-commerce + fintech" giants with proprietary transaction data and ecosystems, making it challenging for standalone fintech players to compete effectively.

链捕手Há 37m

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

链捕手Há 37m

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

Bernstein analyst Stacy A. Rasgon published a report on June 18 regarding Intel, assessing the potential impact of recent political support for a US-based PC chip design and manufacturing collaboration between Apple and Intel. The report views this as a significant signal for the foundry landscape shift but concludes the initial financial contribution would be minimal. Key conclusions: 1) An Apple deal is seen as a small-scale "proof of concept." Even if Intel wins 40% of Apple's premium notebook chip orders (~5 million units/year), Bernstein estimates it would generate only about $500M in annual revenue and ~$0.03 EPS, negligible against Intel's ~$55B revenue. 2) Political encouragement is not equivalent to enforceable mandates. Winning orders ultimately depends on Intel demonstrating competitive technology (like its 18A node), cost, and reliable supply. 3) The path from validation to large-scale production involves significant challenges, capital investment, and time. Due to these uncertainties, Bernstein maintains a Market-Perform (Hold) rating with a $100 price target, implying potential downside from the ~$121.10 price at the report date. The analysis highlights the tension between near-term validation value—serving as a crucial trust signal for Intel's foundry ambitions and US supply chain resilience—and the long-term opportunity to attract larger cloud and AI chip customers. The investment thesis hinges on successful 18A execution and sustained policy support, not on immediate financial gains from Apple.

marsbitHá 1h

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片