SEC Overstepped Bounds in Kraken Lawsuit, State AGs Charge

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-03-01Última atualização em 2024-03-01

A group of state attorneys general are arguing that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission exceeded its authority in suing the crypto exchange Kraken.

State law enforcement officials from Montana, Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota and Texas filed a joint amicus brief – or friend of the court filing – in the SEC's suit against Kraken on Thursday, alongside a number of industry lobbyists and other participants.

12.1K

Saying the SEC's suit might even harm consumers, the state AGs argued that the agency was expanding the definition of an "investment contract," and that cryptocurrencies "are not automatically securities."

Advertisement
Advertisement

The filing, which echoed some of Kraken's own arguments – as well as other crypto companies – said the states were not filing in support of the exchange, but rather in opposition to the federal regulator.

"States have a strong interest in preventing the potential preemption of consumer protection and other state laws by the SEC’s attempt to regulate crypto assets as securities," the filing said. "... The SEC’s exercise of this undelegated authority puts consumers at risk by potentially preempting state statutes better tailored to the specific risks of non-securities products. Some state laws are more protective of consumers than the federal securities laws."

State cases have helped clarify the definition of investment contracts in the past, the filing said.

If the SEC wins its suit, it might be able to preempt state consumer protection laws, as well as state regulations around crypto, the filing said.

The SEC sued Kraken last fall, alleging the exchange had failed to register as a securities broker, clearinghouse or trading platform. It's a similar complaint the SEC has brought against companies like Coinbase, Binance and Bittrex's U.S. branch. While Bittrex settled, the Coinbase and Binance/Binance.US suits are ongoing.

Unlike those other suits, the SEC argued that Kraken was explicitly involved in touting 11 different digital assets it said the exchange listed as unregistered securities. The SEC also alleged Kraken commingled customer and corporate funds.

Kraken filed a motion to dismiss last week, arguing the SEC had failed to "plausibly allege" its arguments, and that it was overreaching its bounds – similar arguments to those made by Coinbase and Binance.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The case saw a flurry of amicus briefs on Wednesday and Thursday from industry groups like the Chamber of Digital Commerce, the Blockchain Association and the DeFi Education Fund.

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) also filed a brief, similar to the one her office filed in the SEC's case against Coinbase.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin Withstood 10 Bearish Blows in 2026, Yet Experienced Its Mildest Bear Market

Bitcoin, the leading cryptocurrency by market cap, peaked above $126,000 in early October before entering a prolonged decline. By August, it was mainly trading between $63,000 and $65,400, inflicting losses on late buyers but resulting in what is, historically for Bitcoin, an unusually shallow bear market—down about 49% from its peak, compared to typical 75-80% plunges. Throughout 2026, Bitcoin faced multiple headwinds yet demonstrated notable resilience. Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and volatile oil prices revived inflation concerns but failed to trigger the panic-driven sell-offs seen in prior cycles. A significant psychological blow came from corporate seller MicroStrategy, a longtime accumulator, which began strategic sales to bolster its cash position, reducing its holdings. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs also faced sustained outflows, though a late-week inflow hinted at potential relief. Pressure also came from within the ecosystem. A contentious blockchain proposal, BIP-110, failed after a minority chain stalled. Miners, facing tighter economics, sold reserves and pivoted infrastructure toward AI. A major security breach involving Coldcard hardware wallets saw an estimated 2,000 BTC stolen, shaking confidence in self-custody. Long-term threats like quantum computing resurfaced in discussions. Despite this confluence of corporate selling, ETF outflows, miner capitulation, geopolitical shocks, internal conflict, and security issues—any one of which could historically cause sharp declines—Bitcoin stubbornly held above a key $60,000 support level. Deeper market liquidity, regulated products, and long-term holders appear to be absorbing selling pressure that once would have caused deeper crashes. This resilience suggests a maturing market structure, though risks remain. Another shock could still push Bitcoin toward $50,000. For now, its 49% decline, severe for most assets, is relatively moderate by Bitcoin's own volatile standards. The remaining months of 2026 will test whether $60,000 is a durable floor or merely the next major line of defense.

cryptonews.ruHá 40m

Bitcoin Withstood 10 Bearish Blows in 2026, Yet Experienced Its Mildest Bear Market

cryptonews.ruHá 40m

Korean Financial Supervisory Service to Revise Compensation System for Phishing Losses Involving Crypto Transfer

The South Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) is overhauling its system for reimbursing victims of voice phishing scams. Starting in October, the new system will be able to calculate and compensate losses held in cryptocurrency, not just in Korean won. Previously, the reimbursement system assumed stolen funds were in won, failing to fully compensate victims whose money was converted into digital assets. The upgraded software will apply a recovery ratio to determine the specific type and quantity of tokens owed to each victim, based on the token's value at the time the payment was frozen. It will also better track cases where fraud proceeds are split across multiple accounts and later consolidated. These changes follow March 31st amendments to the Act on Reimbursement of Losses from Telecommunications Fraud, which now classify virtual assets as both damaged and recoverable property. Major Korean crypto exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb must now comply with the same anti-phishing obligations as banks, including verifying transaction purposes and tracking suspicious funds. The revised law takes effect October 1st, with the FSS allocating a three-month period and a budget of 118.53 million won for system implementation and troubleshooting. The update addresses schemes where stolen money is intentionally laundered through cryptocurrency for overseas transfer. Notably, telecom fraud losses in South Korea rose 14.1% to 433.8 billion won in 2025, a five-year high.

cryptonews.ruHá 51m

Korean Financial Supervisory Service to Revise Compensation System for Phishing Losses Involving Crypto Transfer

cryptonews.ruHá 51m

Trading

Spot
活动图片