Australian Judge Hands Split Decision in Market’s Regulator vs Block Earner

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-02-11Última atualização em 2024-02-12

Resumo

The court will determine the fine Block Earner will have to pay during a scheduled hearing on March 1, 2024.

  • Fintech company Block Earner engaged in unlicensed services by offering its crypto-backed Earner product, ruled an Australian Federal Court.
  • The court though, handed Block Earner a part victory against Australia’s markets regulator by adjudicating that its DeFi “Access" service was not illegal.
10

An Australian court has given a split decision in a case brought by Australia’s markets regulator against Sydney-based crypto start-up Block Earner.

Judge Ian McNeil Jackman, who is also the brother of actor Hugh Jackman, ruled on Friday that Block Earner engaged in unlicensed financial services conduct when offering its crypto-backed Earner product.

However, Jackman dismissed allegations relating to Block Earner’s DeFi “Access” service. The court will determine the fine Block Earner will have to pay during a scheduled hearing on March 1, 2024.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) sued Block Earner, alleging the fintech company provided a range of unlicensed fixed-yield earning products based on crypto assets in November 2022. In the same month, Block Earner, which has backing from crypto exchange Coinbase, voluntarily withdrew its fixed-yield “Earner” service.

ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court said, “This important decision provides some clarity as to when crypto-backed products should be considered financial products which require licensing under the law.”

“Block Earner can continue offering Access, and the case provides guidance for other crypto businesses highlighting ’a positive step forward’ that 'provides a glimpse into a future where DeFi can thrive,” the company said in an announcement.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.



Leituras Relacionadas

Supply Skyrockets by 3 Trillion, Veteran Blockchain Harmony Dealt Another Fatal Blow

**Title: Supply Surges by 3 Trillion, Dealing Another Blow to Veteran Blockchain Harmony** A significant security breach has struck the Harmony blockchain, involving the illegal minting of approximately 3 trillion ONE tokens (valued around $23.4 billion), which constitutes about 26% of its total supply. The attack exploited critical logic errors in Harmony's cross-shard receipt verification and signature validation systems, allowing the attacker to forge receipts and bypass security checks. Initial reports indicated around 4 billion tokens were minted, but this figure was later revised drastically upwards as more data became available. A substantial portion of the newly minted tokens was quickly transferred to cryptocurrency exchanges, leading to a sharp price drop of nearly 38% for ONE. Harmony's official response included identifying related wallet addresses, urging exchanges to freeze associated funds, releasing a software patch (v2026.1.1) to prevent further minting, and temporarily halting its cross-chain bridge service. The team is also evaluating the option of a network rollback. This incident marks the third major security or technical issue directly affecting Harmony's token supply in recent years, following a $100 million bridge hack in 2022 and a staking bug in late 2023. Once a notable Layer 1 chain, Harmony's market capitalization has dwindled to around $12 million, with its Total Value Locked (TVL) collapsing from a peak over $1.4 billion to under $170,000. The event underscores the persistent security vulnerabilities faced by smaller blockchain protocols and highlights the importance of scrutinizing a project's security history and on-chain activity.

marsbitHá 1h

Supply Skyrockets by 3 Trillion, Veteran Blockchain Harmony Dealt Another Fatal Blow

marsbitHá 1h

ENS Has Quietly Completed a 'Self-Revolution'

On August 11th, the ENS DAO officially voted into effect the "Next Era of ENS DAO" proposal. This move by the crucial Ethereum domain name protocol establishes a legal entity, the ENS Foundation, to represent it in the real world—a long-missing piece after nearly a decade of operation. The proposal, initially introduced in June, sparked significant community debate. Critics feared it amounted to the DAO dissolving itself and handing over its treasury. The final version, however, represents a compromise, carefully balancing control. The DAO retains governance over its substantial ENS token holdings and its operational wallet. A $65 million endowment is delegated to the Foundation's Board but protected by a 9-day timelock and a Security Council veto. The DAO also holds ultimate power to appoint and remove Board members. The Foundation's role is to handle tasks the DAO is ill-suited for, such as legal representation, trademark enforcement, and engagement with traditional internet governance bodies like ICANN. This allows ENS Labs, the core development company, to focus on engineering, like the upcoming ENSv2. The five-member Foundation Board includes independent directors with provisions to manage conflicts of interest, particularly regarding funding to ENS Labs. This governance restructuring aims to create a clearer separation of duties: the DAO safeguards protocol neutrality, the Foundation handles real-world operations and diplomacy, and ENS Labs focuses on development. It acknowledges the limitations of pure token voting for day-to-day operations, seeking efficiency through a professionally managed entity with built-in accountability mechanisms. The ENS experiment—aiming to be both credibly neutral and effectively represented in traditional forums—will be closely watched as a potential model for the broader DAO ecosystem.

marsbitHá 1h

ENS Has Quietly Completed a 'Self-Revolution'

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片