Digital sovereignty: Reclaiming your private data in Web3

CointelegraphPublicado em 2022-05-07Última atualização em 2022-05-07

Resumo

As the Fair Data Society puts it, we are laborers in the data economy.

As the Fair Data Society puts it, we are laborers in the data economy. Our personal data — basically, the digital blueprint of our lives — gets collected by platforms we interact with, most often in a non-transparent way. At best, it is used to improve our user experience. At worst, our privacy gets breached, monetized and even weaponized against us.

It all started with the emergence and growth of the user-generated web, as seemingly free social media networks, search engines and companies saw a new opportunity of profiting and went into the business of gathering, storing, analyzing and selling user data. By 2022, the data market had grown immensely. According to Statista, a total of 64.2 zettabytes of data had been created, consumed and put online worldwide by 2020. By 2025, this number is expected to exceed 180 zettabytes.

Talking about the evolution of data sovereignty in a profit-driven climate, professor Sabina Leonelli said:
“Individual agency in the data economy has shrunk, with a few organizations dominating the conditions under which information can be exchanged and used, to the detriment of individual rights and collective action.”
Indeed, over three-quarters of the global search market is under the control of the Google search engine and over 3.6 billion individual users across four social media platforms owned by Meta.

Course for data sovereignty
Big Tech companies recognized the pressure and increasing regulatory demand, so in 2018, the Data Transfer Project was born. Six contributors — Google, Microsoft, Apple, Twitter, Facebook and SmugMug — committed to enabling seamless data transfer among platforms via a common framework with open-source code. Still, it was just the first step toward users reclaiming their data.
In the past few years, the demand for transparency, trustlessness, security and decentralization has formed across multiple sectors of our life: from finance to organizational management to data storage. This is evident in the blockchain technologies and solutions such as decentralized finance, decentralized autonomous organizations and Web3, which aim to grant users full control over their digital lives and protect the basic human right to data privacy.
So, what are data sovereignty and radical data ownership — and how can they be achieved?
In a nutshell, achieving data sovereignty means the user takes full control over their data. They finally get to know (and have a say on) where it goes and what purposes it can be used for, while the data itself is not locked into a single platform. The advocates of this concept are aiming to create a new, fair digital space where information will be used for social good, and its value will be distributed in alignment with Web3 and Fair Data Principles, and there are a number of decentralized instruments that will help achieve that.
Web3: My keys, my data
One of the primary features of Web3 that makes it different from the web we know is the lack of centralized data repositories. Decentralized storages provide us with a single source of truth — the same as blockchain does, just for private and big data.
The use of protocols and a decentralized data layer will make it possible to encrypt and exchange information in a system of peer-to-peer networks, while content-based addressing makes sure that we know the data hasn’t been tampered with: When we download a chunk from a certain address, we know that this data is correct because its hash corresponds to the address.
Moreover, there’s no data sovereignty without data interoperability. As opposed to data monopolies, where users are locked into proprietary interfaces, Web3 is based on the idea of using noncustodial solutions. By using keys, users will be able to access the same set of their private data from multiple platforms (also known as BYOD) and move it freely among storages and apps.
The sign-up process will see changes, too. For one, we use email addresses to create accounts, or tie them to our Google adn Facebook profiles. In Web3, email credentials will be replaced with wallet addresses. “Sign in with Ethereum,” which is funded by the Ethereum Foundation and will probably become a standard, is a good example here. While all interactions with the blockchain are available for public viewing, logging in with an anonymous wallet address will help preserve confidentiality.
Meanwhile, builders and content creators will get access to new ways of monetizing their content. Tokens, both fungible and nonfungible, are the “likes” and “retweets” of Web3. These can be used to reward quality content and share pieces of data, all while making sure the creator gets a fair share of the royalties.
And finally, as far as control over data is concerned, introducing decentralized governance is yet another way to topple the monopolistic power of Big Tech. Decentralized autonomous organizations have the potential to bring democracy and transparency to the decision-making process on the blockchain, as transactions are verified through consensus.
Bringing trust and privacy into the data economy
Achieving digital sovereignty means treating users as persons, not cogs in the data economy machine. To summarize the above, it can be achieved by building human-centric applications where data interoperability and data sovereignty are put first, incentivizing the development of the new web infrastructure that supports encryption, data protection and ethical, transparent business models. Of course, basic digital literacy would also reduce the chances of internet users unwittingly signing away their privacy.
As a closing note, it would be important to emphasize that this is a collaborative effort — one bigger than a single individual or organization — and the whole Web3 space should work together. This way, we can start reclaiming privacy for the individual and bringing trust into the data economy on a societal level.

Leituras Relacionadas

Huawei Cloud Rejects Token Price War, Zhou Yuefeng Seeks a New Winning Formula for AI Cloud

At the 2026 Huawei Cloud INSPIRE Creator Conference, CEO Zhou Yuefeng outlined Huawei Cloud's distinct strategy in the competitive AI cloud market. Instead of engaging in price wars based on token volume or Maas revenue—a common focus for rivals like Alibaba Cloud and ByteDance's Volcano Engine—Huawei Cloud is shifting the competition towards real-world productivity gains. Zhou highlighted three core differentiators: a fully domestic computing stack (Ascend, Kunpeng), a focus on government and enterprise clients rather than consumer internet, and a deep commitment to open-source ecosystems. To this end, Huawei Cloud launched a suite of new products under the "Agentic Infra" paradigm, including the AICS Lingqu computing cluster, AMS memory storage, and the ModelArts Next platform. These aim to solve enterprise challenges in deploying AI agents, such as latency, memory, scheduling, and security. The strategy further involves creating specialized industry zones ("AI Dream Factories") for sectors like healthcare and embodied intelligence. For example, a smart medical zone developed with Shanghai Ruijin Hospital aims to democratize expert-level diagnostic capabilities. In essence, Huawei Cloud is positioning itself not as a commodity token provider, but as the foundational infrastructure for industrial AI, leveraging its domestic supply chain and hybrid cloud solutions to serve sectors where productivity, not just scale, is the ultimate measure of value.

marsbitHá 16m

Huawei Cloud Rejects Token Price War, Zhou Yuefeng Seeks a New Winning Formula for AI Cloud

marsbitHá 16m

70% of the Public Opposes AI, Americans Hope the U.S. Loses the AI War

70% of Americans believe AI development is moving too fast, with growing public resistance evolving from online criticism to real-world protests and violence. This widespread anti-AI sentiment stems from fears of job losses, rising utility costs, environmental damage, threats to democracy, and financial instability. Key incidents illustrate the backlash: Google's former CEO Eric Schmidt was loudly booed at a graduation for promoting AI; AI company ads are vandalized; protests and even violent attacks target AI firms and data centers. Polls show deep public pessimism and strong local opposition to data center construction, often surpassing resistance to nuclear power plants. The core grievances are economic and practical: AI is seen as automating jobs, concentrating wealth, and increasing household electricity and water bills due to massive data center resource demands. Environmentalists also oppose AI's high energy use and carbon emissions. This opposition has turned AI into a major political issue in the US. While the Trump administration prioritizes AI innovation for global competition, bipartisan pushback is growing. Democrats and factions within the MAGA movement are forming temporary alliances to support stricter regulations and local bans on new data centers, pressuring the administration to choose between its tech industry backers and its voter base. The situation highlights a profound national divide over AI's future.

marsbitHá 50m

70% of the Public Opposes AI, Americans Hope the U.S. Loses the AI War

marsbitHá 50m

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbitHá 2h

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片