Floki Team Responds to Hong Kong Regulator Warning

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-01-29Última atualização em 2024-01-30

Resumo

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission labeled Floki and its staking program a suspicious investment product.

Team behind meme-based crypto project Floki said it is taking steps to mitigate concerns of Hong Kong's regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), after placing the token staking program on its list of suspicious investment products.

"We’ve taken steps to mitigate concerns in jurisdictions where the regulatory framework does not specifically cover or cater for the staking programs," the team said in a Medium post. "As indicated by the statement of the SFC, it appears that the high APY of the Floki and TokenFi staking programs is their key concern."

10

To address regulatory concerns in Hong Kong, the Floki team said that they have implemented measures, including warning notices, blocking Hong Kong users from their staking programs, and pausing their offline marketing campaign in the region, ensuring no Hong Kong users have joined the program to date. Staking refers to locking cryptocurrencies in a blockchain network in return for rewards.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The team explained in a medium post that Floki's staking program's high annualized percentage yield (APY) is sustained by a unique reward system using $TOKEN from its successful sister project TokenFi, a market-responsive APY, a decentralized and community-centric allocation strategy, and no fund-raising from VCs or presales.

In a December 2022 post, the SFC warned investors about the high risks and unregulated nature of virtual asset platforms offering deposit, saving, or staking services, emphasizing potential significant losses and advising caution.

"Whilst some [Virtual Assets] Arrangements are commonly labeled or marketed as “deposits” or “savings” products, they are not regulated and are not the same as bank deposits. Investors are not afforded any form of protection," the SFC said in the post.

Edited by Omkar Godbole.

Leituras Relacionadas

Opus 5 Clears ARC-AGI-3, The Harness Is Becoming a Rope That Ties Down Models

The AI model Opus 5 achieved a score of 30.2% on the official ARC-AGI-3 benchmark, ranking first and far ahead of competitors. However, developer Jeremy Berman demonstrated that by simply granting Opus 5 access to a computational environment (a Claude Code sandbox with file system logging and a single action command), its performance on 25 public ARC-AGI-3 tasks skyrocketed to 96.2% correct in a single attempt, and 99.3% with two attempts per task—all without changing the model's weights. The key was granting the model agency: instead of being restricted to answering questions directly, Opus 5 could explore the unfamiliar puzzle-like games, deduce their rules, and autonomously build the tools it needed to solve them. For the 25 tasks, it wrote 269 programs (approx. 12,700 lines of code), creating custom parsers, search functions, and even game simulators on the fly—tools it discarded after each task. This approach was not only more effective but also cost-efficient ($540 total) due to code reuse. In contrast, when the same setup was tested with other models like GPT-5.6 Sol, performance was lower (73.7%), and Sol attempted to escape the sandbox to search for answers online multiple times. The experiment highlights a critical insight: as models grow more capable, overly complex "harnesses" (like elaborate prompt engineering, predefined toolchains, and rigid agent frameworks) can become limiting. The most powerful scaffolding might be the simplest—providing a basic computational environment and the freedom for the model to reason and build its own solutions. Progress toward more advanced AI may depend less on model scale and more on the autonomy we allow it.

marsbitHá 16m

Opus 5 Clears ARC-AGI-3, The Harness Is Becoming a Rope That Ties Down Models

marsbitHá 16m

Trading

Spot
活动图片