CoinGecko NFT Survey 2022

CoinGeckoPublicado em 2022-05-06Última atualização em 2022-05-06

Resumo

Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs) is Collins Dictionary’s Word of Year for 2021, and is not without a good reason.

Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs) is Collins Dictionary’s Word of Year for 2021, and is not without a good reason. NFTs saw a meteoric rise in mid-2021 that ushered in a storm of interest, even from outside the cryptoverse. Total trading volume of NFTs hit over $5 BILLION at its height in August 2022, kickstarting what is now known as “NFT Summer”. Since then, the market has tapered off slightly but NFT is still one of the hottest buzzwords in town, and continues to grace headlines, both within and outside of the cryptoverse.

NFT are polarizing – there's a small group of people pledging beliefs in the underlying technology, a good deal more opportunists attempting to capitalize on its financial upside, while others cry foul at this new age digital “skem”. So, how do people really feel about NFTs?

Here at CoinGecko, we conducted a poll on Twitter to take a deeper look at the demographic of NFT owners, their behavior, motivation, tendencies, preferences, knowledge , and perception related to NFTs.

Disclaimer: We acknowledge that the Twitter poll is not optimal to conduct the survey. Hence, kindly treat the survey results as a proxy to the crypto Twitter community usage and attitude towards NFTs.

Here are our 5 key findings:

Majority of the respondents are from the APAC region, aged 18-30 and 30-50. 72% of these own NFTs, with more than half of them having 5 or more NFTs

Metaverse / gaming NFTs are the most common type of NFTs owned, with half of the respondents having participated in metaverse(s) before

Flippers top NFT ownership at 42%, majority of crypto portfolios (70%) assign only 0-25% to NFTs and less than half of the respondents have profited from trading

PC is the preferred choice for trading and minting NFTs, while most of the respondents hunt for new projects on Discord/Twitter and track their portfolio via marketplace wallet UI

Most respondents are interested in floor price when trading NFTs, with over half motivated by current & future utility to HODL

Majority of the respondents are from the APAC region, aged 18-30 and 30-50. 72% of these own NFTs, with more than half of them having 5 or more NFTs.

Out of the 871 respondents, ~72% of them are owners of NFT(s), with more than half of them having 5 or more NFTs.

There’s a relatively even split for age brackets 18-30 and 30-50, with most of the respondents belonging to the latter group (45.2%), followed closely by 43.6% in the former.

Interestingly, the APAC region leads NFT adoption among survey respondents at 38.8%, similar to the findings from our previous Axie Infinity survey. Another independent survey corroborates this, which also found Philippines, Thailand and Malaysia as the 3 leading countries for NFT adoption.

Europe followed closely as the second largest region (31.7%) of respondents, with North/South America a distant third (18.3%).

Metaverse / gaming NFTs are the most common type of NFTs owned, with half of the respondents having participated in metaverse(s) before

NFT ownership congregates around metaverse/gaming type NFTs (35.8%), followed by a relatively even split between PFPs (27.4%) and Art (25.3%). With most of our respondents/NFT owners residing in the APAC region, the outcome is unsurprising considering the dominance of GameFi NFTs in Asia.

When it comes to ownership of metaverse lands or items, the results (30.5%) mirror the numbers from metaverse/gaming NFT ownership (35.8%) – highlighting the common overlap between GameFi and Metaverse NFTs/projects, and how the former frequently incorporates elements from the latter, vice versa.

Only about half of the respondents had participated in metaverse(s) before, with only 20% of them being classified as “regulars”.

Metaverse is projected to be an $800B market in the next 2 years, and games look like the most likely NFT-point-of-entry for most people, particularly crypto folks.

Flippers top NFT ownership at 42%, majority of crypto portfolios (70%) assign only 0-25% to NFTs and less than half of the respondents have profited from trading

“Buy low, sell high” tops as the driving force behind NFT purchase at 42.2%.

On the other hand, the HODL mentality of “to collect” and “for their utility” feature a combined dominance of around 50%. This is consistent with the question “have you sold any NFTs” where only half of them responded “Yes”.

Less than half of the respondents (43%) have profited from NFT trading, while 23% are HODLers by choice with no regard for profiteering off NFTs.

Suppose we only consider the ratio between “Yes” and “No”, roughly 57% of the non-HODLing traders turned a profit in NFTs, possibly a sign of trading proficiency among respondents, who are most NFT veterans.

Interestingly, NFTs constitute only a small portion of most crypto portfolios, with close to 70% of them only featuring 0-25% of NFTs.

PC is the preferred choice for trading and minting NFTs, while most of the respondents hunt for new projects on Discord/Twitter and track their portfolio via marketplace wallet UI

60% of NFT owners prefer to mint / trade NFTs solely on PC, with only 21% using mobile devices. The dominance of PC could be owed to its superiority in manoeuvring the time-sensitive nature of NFT mints / trades, especially when wallet mobile apps are still largely unwieldy compared to their PC counterpart.

Over 60% of users track new, upcoming NFT projects via Discord and Twitter, where information is fragmented and often scattered among other noises. That said, they still seem to be the best option to stumble across fresh-out-of-the-oven projects. Aggregator platforms such as Rarity Tools exist but usage is low (4.1%), perhaps due to the lag time in updates (which could be the difference for early access whitelists), or imperfect coverage.

Over half of the users track NFT portfolio via marketplaces as opposed to more structured approaches (e.g. portfolio managers, Excel)

Close to 40% of respondents are mostly interested in floor price when trading NFTs, with half of them citing current/future utility as the primary reason to HODL.

When questioned about the attribute that drives their NFT trades/purchases, 38.5% respondents cite “Floor Price” as the most important. Again, this is in line with our earlier question about the motivation for trading NFTs which saw ~40% selecting “flip & earn”. The floor price is a common metric used to gauge affordability and potential upside of a collection/piece.

Rarity score and hype/influencer endorsement on the other hand sit at ~30% and ~18% respectively.

Outside of flipping for profit, half of the respondents (50.9%) think that current or future utility of NFTs is the main incentive for them to HODL, with only 23% and 21.8% selecting “strong community” and “artistic value/attachment”. Based on our survey, it seems that NFT owners value NFTs that are perceived to deliver the most ‘practical’ value, rather than intangible qualities such as its aesthetics. Recent NFT projects are also trending towards having some form of utility (e.g. exclusive access, future airdrops), instead of being just “onchain JPEGs”.

Conclusion

It’s been interesting to peek behind the curtains of NFTs and see what makes the owners tick. Gaming and metaverse NFTs, propelled into the spotlight by Axie Infinity the hooha surrounding Metaverses, tops the spot as the most popular type of NFT to be owned. Most respondents self-identified as flippers who are in to make a quick buck out of NFTs but at the same time, the combined majority (51%) still expressed interest in hodling either to collect, or for the underlying utility. All in all, it’s not exactly a pure speculation market as perpetrated by common beliefs.

NFT trading volume has dipped over the course of Q1 2022, but at the same time, it’s also made leaps and bounds evident in the mega-partnerships struck up by RTFKT and Bored Ape Yacht Club. Where NFTs will ultimately be is still anyone’s guess at this point. But the fact is, just as crypto in general, the world of NFTs is still rife with scams and volatile prices. For those who are considering dipping your toes into NFTs, we urge that you always, always DYOR.

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbitHá 56m

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbitHá 56m

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbitHá 2h

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbitHá 2h

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbitHá 2h

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbitHá 2h

A Country That Mined Bitcoin for 8 Years Has Built Its Own Dedicated Crypto Bank

A country that has been mining Bitcoin for eight years has established its own dedicated crypto bank. DK Bank, located in Bhutan's newly developed GMC special administrative zone, aims to fill the significant banking service gap for the cryptocurrency industry. Its CEO, Zheng YD, explained that most banks avoid crypto businesses due to a lack of risk management frameworks for decentralized and anonymous protocols. Operating under a unique "one country, two systems" governance model separate from mainland Bhutan, GMC aspires to become a financial hub for South Asia. DK Bank differentiates itself by offering integrated multi-currency accounts where users can manage both fiat currencies and stablecoins like USDT and USDC in one place, alongside services like Bitcoin-backed loans. The bank faces technical challenges in merging traditional banking systems with 24/7 crypto markets and implements rigorous on-chain and off-chain transaction monitoring for risk control. GMC's regulatory framework draws from Singaporean common law and Abu Dhabi's ADGM rules, offering a fast-track licensing process for already licensed firms while maintaining high standards. The initiative is part of Bhutan's longer-term crypto strategy, which includes Bitcoin mining since 2018. The focus, however, is on building a diversified institutional-grade crypto ecosystem—including custody and asset management—rather than retail speculative tokens. Proponents argue such sovereign crypto infrastructure is necessary, and Bhutan's early, measured approach exemplifies the thoughtful integration needed in global finance.

Foresight NewsHá 2h

A Country That Mined Bitcoin for 8 Years Has Built Its Own Dedicated Crypto Bank

Foresight NewsHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片