Why Indonesia’s Upcoming Elections Could Make or Break the Country’s Vibrant Crypto Sector

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-01-21Última atualização em 2024-01-22

Resumo

Not all leading candidates have been vocal about crypto – but scattered remarks offer clues about where the industry might be headed under their leadership.

Indonesia’s government has shown a keen interest in crypto – but the general elections in February could shake things up for the industry, especially if leadership were to change.

While current President Joko Widodo’s government had global plans for crypto issued in Indonesia, and even set up the world’s first bourse for digital assets, the next leaders may not be as excited about the sector.

14K

Not all leading candidates have been vocal about crypto, but their comments offer clues about where the industry might be headed under their leadership.

Advertisement
Advertisement

For instance, presidential and vice-presidential candidates Anies Baswedan and Muhaimin Iskandar have been relatively quiet on crypto matters. However, they represent the opposition, and the duo has plans for an overhaul of existing policies, which may have some consequences for the crypto sector.

In 2022, Muhaimin advocated for taxing crypto transactions to boost state revenues. He also called for stricter regulation, including for the sector to be supervised by the Financial Services Authority (OJK). The OJK will indeed be taking over crypto supervision in 2025, but the industry is hoping that changeover could mean lesser tax burdens for crypto users and exchanges – something it says has been driving away traders.

Another candidate pair is made up of presidential hopeful Ganjar Pranowo and his running mate Mahfud MD, who is a veteran politician and constitutional law expert. They haven’t talked about crypto during the campaign, but back in 2022, when non-fungible tokens (NFT) were having a moment, Ganjar, the governor of Central Java at that time, praised the creativity of NFTs.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ganjar saw Ghozali, one of Indonesia’s NFT success stories, as a source of inspiration for the country’s youth. Still, he made sure to drop a reminder on the importance of paying taxes to keep the nation's well-being.

Leading the race

The candidate most vocal about crypto so far is Gibran Rakabuming Raka, the controversial running mate of current Defense Minister Prabowo Subianto. Raka is the son of President Widodo and a strong proponent of digitization – particularly with blockchain and crypto.

In December, he made headlines for saying he wants to prepare blockchain and crypto experts to improve Indonesia’s tech sector. He reiterated this during the second official presidential debate focused on economic and infrastructure topics on Dec. 22.

Prabowo has meanwhile said his government will enhance the supervision of tax compliance among stock and crypto traders to combat tax evasion.

Prabowo and Raka together seem to be most likely to continue existing policies and attitudes toward crypto in the country – and potentially embrace more crypto-friendly regulatory changes.

Indonesia’s general elections are set to start on Feb. 14.

Edited by Sandali Handagama.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHá 3h

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHá 3h

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手Há 4h

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手Há 4h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片