Sam Bankman-Fried's Parents Ask Court to Dismiss FTX's Lawsuit Seeking to Recover Funds

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-01-16Última atualização em 2024-01-17

Resumo

Bankman and Fried, both professors at Stanford Law School, argued that Bankman did not have a fiduciary relationship with FTX .

Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, the parents of Sam Bankman-Fried, have asked a court to dismiss a lawsuit by the bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX seeking to recover funds it alleges were fraudulently transferred.

FTX sought to “recover millions of dollars" from Bankman and Fried in Sept. 2023. Less than two months later, their son, Bankman-Fried, was found guilty on all seven charges of defrauding customers and the United States. His sentencing is expected in March.

38.7K

Bankman and Fried, both professors at Stanford Law School, argued that Bankman did not have a fiduciary relationship with FTX and did not serve "as a director, officer, or manager," and even if a fiduciary relationship existed with FTX to plausibly allege a breach, according to a Jan 15. court filing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Significantly, the court filing argued that it is not enough for FTX to plead that the parents “knew or should have known.” Instead, the filing argued that FTX should have produced specific facts showing “actual knowledge” that the parents “knew certain actions would result in a breach of fiduciary duty.”

In the Sept. 2023 lawsuit filing, FTX did not state the total amount Bankman and Fried may have misappropriated, but it did provide certain line items – Bankman received an annual salary of $200,000 for his role as a senior adviser to the FTX foundation, more than $18 million for the property in the Bahamas and $5.5 million in FTX Group donations to Stanford University, which the University has said will be returned.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.

Leituras Relacionadas

Deciphering the Ethereum Foundation's New Structure: Reaffirming Self-Sovereignty Amid Institutionalization Trends

Summary: The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major restructuring, laying off 20% of its staff and introducing a new five-layer operational framework. This move aims to clarify the EF's mission and reaffirm Ethereum's core principle of self-sovereignty amidst growing institutionalization in the crypto space. The five layers are: 1. **Protocol Layer**: Focuses on maintaining Ethereum's foundational "CROPS" values—Censorship-resistant, Robust, Open, Private, and Secure. This involves core technical work like secure hard forks and mitigating toxic MEV. 2. **Access Layer**: Ensures users can practically exercise self-sovereignty through actions like reading the chain and making transactions. A key principle is the "zero option," meaning a trusted, non-intermediated path must always exist as an alternative to any centralized service. 3. **User Layer**: Bridges the protocol and access layers by grounding EF's work in the real needs of users and organizations. This is seen as crucial for moving beyond a purely research-driven approach and ensuring development effectively serves the ecosystem. 4. **Community Layer**: Responsible for building and maintaining consensus around Ethereum's core values both internally and externally. This involves guarding against centralization, upholding technological neutrality, and preventing short-term commercial interests from undermining CROPS principles. 5. **Institutional Layer**: Manages EF's engagement with institutions, but with the precondition of self-sovereignty. The goal is not to make it easier for institutions to control users, but to demonstrate how Ethereum's technology can enable better integrations. The article argues that while institutional adoption brings legitimacy, it also risks diluting crypto's foundational ethos of decentralization. The new structure represents EF's effort to navigate this tension, upholding its core mission while actively engaging with a broader, more complex ecosystem.

marsbitHá 14m

Deciphering the Ethereum Foundation's New Structure: Reaffirming Self-Sovereignty Amid Institutionalization Trends

marsbitHá 14m

OpenRouter: How Did This 'AI Model Relay Station' Achieve a $10 Billion Valuation?

OpenRouter: The Model Router Building a $10B+ Company This article explores OpenRouter, a platform that aggregates access to over 400 AI models from 70+ providers (like OpenAI, Claude, Gemini) through a single API. It has grown into a unicorn with a $1.3B valuation by 2026, processing massive scale—reaching 100 trillion tokens monthly. Its core value isn't just being a "model supermarket." For developers building real-world AI applications, managing multiple models for different tasks (e.g., cheap models for titles, powerful ones for long articles) is complex. OpenRouter acts as a critical "model scheduling layer," handling routing, failover between providers, cost optimization, and enterprise features like zero-data-retention policies and budget controls. OpenRouter's business model is a "toll fee": it charges a small platform fee (5.5%) on purchased credits while passing model costs directly to users. Its revenue scales with the tokens flowing through its system, which saw explosive growth as AI apps evolved. Key growth drivers include: 1) The explosion of specialized models, increasing choice complexity; 2) AI apps shifting focus from performance to cost optimization; 3) The rise of AI agents that require more reliable, multi-step model calls. However, risks remain. Large enterprises or cloud providers (AWS, Google Cloud) could build similar internal gateways. Its position between model suppliers and developers could also create future tension over pricing and data control. To stay ahead, OpenRouter must deepen its enterprise features and prove it's more than just a request forwarder.

marsbitHá 34m

OpenRouter: How Did This 'AI Model Relay Station' Achieve a $10 Billion Valuation?

marsbitHá 34m

Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000 Again; After 20 Months, We've Reached a New Low

Bitcoin Drops Below $60,000, Hitting a 20-Month Low Bitcoin fell below the key $60,000 psychological level again, reaching a low of $59,023—its lowest point in approximately 20 months, dating back to October 2024. While it later recovered slightly to around $60,600, this marks its third significant breach of $60,000 this year. The downturn is attributed to two primary factors. First, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing their longest streak of net outflows since launch, with nearly $5.94 billion withdrawn over 30 days. This creates sustained selling pressure as Authorized Participants sell Bitcoin to meet redemptions. Second, shifting macroeconomic expectations are adding pressure. Strong U.S. job data and hawkish remarks from Fed officials have increased market pricing for potential rate hikes, reversing the earlier liquidity-driven bullish sentiment and prompting a shift away from risk assets like Bitcoin. Analyst views are mixed. 21Shares maintains a bullish long-term outlook, expecting prices to recover towards $100,000, citing historical post-halving cycles and substantial ETF holdings as a base. In contrast, Arthur Hayes predicts a potential bottom around $40,000 within six months due to persistent Fed hawkishness. CryptoQuant suggests, based on on-chain data, that the market may not find a bottom until prices fall below the average investor cost basis around $53,000, potentially extending the bearish phase into late 2026 or early 2027. The immediate focus is on upcoming U.S. inflation data and Fed signals. Lower-than-expected CPI could offer relief, but confirmation of sticky inflation or continued ETF outflows may lead to further downside pressure. Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000 remains a critical test for the near-term market direction.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000 Again; After 20 Months, We've Reached a New Low

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片