Hacker Seized SEC Phone Number to Post Fake Bitcoin ETF Approval, X Says

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-01-09Última atualização em 2024-01-10

Resumo

The revelation raises questions about the investments regulator's security protocols.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) did not employ basic security measures on its X (formerly Twitter) account when it was "compromised" to spread false bitcoin ETF news, according to the social media company.

Late Tuesday, X's Safety team said it had completed its "preliminary investigation" into the SEC's market-moving, false post on approval of bitcoin ETF applications, which the regulator blamed on its "compromised" account.

12.5K

"The compromise was not due to any breach of X’s systems, but rather due to an unidentified individual obtaining control over a phone number associated with the @SECGov account through a third party," X's Safety account posted.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The explanation seemingly rules out an "inside job" or "fat finger" theory of the midday post, which pumped the price of bitcoin and then crashed it before SEC Chair Gary Gensler announced the post was phony.

But it raises new questions about basic security measures being taken by the SEC, the most powerful investment regulator in the U.S. and one whose statements are closely watched, and traded on. Gensler himself has previously encouraged investors to take their security seriously.

"We can also confirm that the account did not have two-factor authentication enabled at the time the account was compromised. We encourage all users to enable this extra layer of security," X posted.

An SEC spokesperson did not immediately return a request for comment on the statement.


Leituras Relacionadas

Tokenized SpaceX Stock Liquidations Show Crypto Leverage Reaching Private Markets

Tokenized SpaceX stock positions recently experienced significant liquidations, illustrating the growing risk as crypto-style leverage enters private-market equity products. This episode highlights a key tension in the tokenized asset narrative: while these products aim to democratize access to high-demand, late-stage private companies like SpaceX, pairing them with leverage transforms them into high-volatility instruments more akin to crypto derivatives than traditional equity investments. The demand for tokenized SpaceX exposure stems from its brand power, scarcity, and investor interest. However, this access does not eliminate inherent risks, including jurisdictional limits, complex redemption terms, liquidity constraints, and differences in investor rights compared to direct ownership. The incident serves as a broader warning for the tokenized real-world asset (RWA) market. For sustainable growth, platforms must establish clear rules around custody, pricing, leverage, and disclosures. Regulators are likely to scrutinize whether such products are marketed as equity access while functioning as leveraged derivatives. This story underscores ongoing market themes: increasing regulatory specificity, the integration of crypto products with traditional finance rails, and heightened sensitivity to liquidity conditions. It reinforces the need to view developments through the lens of evolving market structure, leverage, and institutional participation rather than as isolated price catalysts.

bitcoinistHá 52m

Tokenized SpaceX Stock Liquidations Show Crypto Leverage Reaching Private Markets

bitcoinistHá 52m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片