New York's Crypto BitLicense Oversight Criticized by State's Comptroller

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-01-08Última atualização em 2024-01-09

Resumo

The New York fiscal chief says the Department of Financial Services let some things fall through the cracks as a crypto watchdog.

The New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) is drawing some internal heat over whether it's doing a good job overseeing crypto activity through its BitLicense program, according to a review from New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli.

DiNapoli's office found that the regulator has relied on spotty, outdated and sometimes totally missing data on the backgrounds of its virtual currency license holders when considering their applications.

The audit report recommended DFS do a better job ensuring applications are complete and examinations are timely.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"For much of our audit scope period, policies and procedures were not in place to provide assurance that DFS' oversight of the application, supervision and examination of BitLicensees was appropriate," DiNapoli's office noted in the document.

However, the agency responded to the comptroller's office in September of 2023 that the problems outlined in a draft version of the report shared with DFS predate the agency's current leadership and have been addressed. The audit began in April of 2022 and extended through much of 2023.

"Over the last two years, DFS has cemented its position as the premier regulator of virtual currencies in the nation and remains committed to further strengthening its efforts," the DFS noted in a response included in the audit report. An agency spokesperson didn't immediately respond to a CoinDesk request for further comment.

The document accused the agency – still the only U.S. regulator with a comprehensive set of rules for doing crypto business – of falling short in several areas, including missing fingerprint information, unavailable background on applicants' tax obligations, long lags between risk assessments on applicants and their eventual approvals, missing financial information and insufficient cybersecurity compliance from BitLicensees.

"DFS noted that our findings predate the tenure of the current DFS administration and that DFS self-identified many of our findings prior to the conclusion of our audit," the report said. "Several issues have not been remediated."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Another New York regulator – the state Attorney General's Office – has also questioned whether the state's financial watchdog is adequately overseeing the crypto industry. The NYAG sued a BitLicense recipient and lobbied for legislation giving it greater oversight in the past year.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Leituras Relacionadas

A 120,000 Yuan Tombstone or 399 Yuan AI Immortality: Which Would You Choose?

"The 'Deathcare Moutai' Fushouyuan, once a highly profitable cemetery operator, has halted trading amid a severe crisis, with its net profit plummeting by 52.8% in 2024. This reflects a broader trend of people rejecting expensive traditional burials, as average grave prices in China have soared to over ¥120,000. In response, the industry is pivoting to digital alternatives, with companies like Fushouyuan offering AI-powered memorial services, such as virtual farewell halls and AI-generated recreations of the deceased. Simultaneously, a low-cost, unregulated AI 'resurrection' industry has emerged online, with services priced as low as ¥399. These often use open-source tools to create crude digital avatars from photos and voice clips, exploiting vulnerable individuals, particularly bereaved parents who have lost their only child. However, these services raise significant ethical and legal concerns, including data privacy risks and potential use in scams. Academic studies warn that such AI companions may exacerbate grief, leading to prolonged mourning disorders and emotional dependency, rather than providing genuine comfort. While regulations are being drafted to manage digital human services, the deep emotional drive to 'reconnect' with loved ones often overshadows rational concerns. Ultimately, the article questions whether digital immortality truly preserves memory or merely offers a commercialized illusion, emphasizing that no technology can replace the real, irreplaceable loss of a human life."

marsbitHá 40m

A 120,000 Yuan Tombstone or 399 Yuan AI Immortality: Which Would You Choose?

marsbitHá 40m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片