Mable Jiang:为什么Gas Hero将重新定义链游?

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2024-01-02Última atualização em 2024-01-02

Resumo

STEPN团队新作Gas Hero即将公开发布。

原文来自 Mable Jiang 的 X 平台,由Odaily星球日报 jk 编译。

Mable Jiang:为什么Gas Hero将重新定义链游?

在这篇文章中,我将讨论为什么 Gas Hero 将成为下一个定义链上游戏的应用程序,以及即使你不玩游戏,这对你(和 GMT)为什么重要。

自从我们两年前使 STEPN 成为一个定义链游的应用程序以来,数百万人了解了非托管钱包,并进行了他们的第一次链上 Swap 交易。

自从我们看到另一个定义整个类别的应用程序以来已经有一段时间了,但不久之后你就会看到下一个。具体来说,就在 24 小时内。

Gas Hero 是:

a) 一款加速的、博弈论导向的人类社会模拟游戏;

b) 一个拥有一套清晰规则+高度自由度的游乐场,人们在其中进行合作和竞争;

c) 一款社交和策略导向的金融游戏(我坚持不称其为“社交金融(Social-Fi)”,因为熟悉我的人都知道我有多讨厌这个词)

免责声明:本帖不构成任何财务建议,因此我不会提供任何关于 Gas Hero 如何与 GMT 的上涨相关的建议或者详细计算。你可以在 Gas Hero 白皮书中找到有关 GMT 汇流和流出的所有信息。我只是在这里与你分享我的猜测,为什么会有人(是的,你不必是游戏玩家就会上瘾,因为我也不是游戏玩家)使用并留在 Gas Hero 中。我相信一些 Aper 会为自己或许为所有人进行数学计算,哈哈。请自行研究(DYOR)。

1. 为什么大家都关心 Gas Hero?当人们为体验付费时,他们获得什么外部性收益?

任何为娱乐付费的人都在寻求某种形式的“舒适”或积极反馈。在 Gas Hero 中,你总能以某种形式的人类欲望:权力、荣耀或财富获得舒适感。

让我们具体解构人们获得的体验:

a) 权力:无论你想要成为一个州长统治地区还是作为一个利他主义者服务,游戏世界由你来控制或贡献;

b) 荣耀:战略家旨在智胜对手,将军寻求战胜敌人;

c) 财富:农民收获产量,而商人利用套利机会获利。

重要的是,规则设置得简单,使每个人都能找到他们特定的乐趣点(如你从我的列表中了解到的,一个愿望可以通过多种方式实现)。规则内的任何事物都是允许的;因此实现这些愿望的手段也是多样的。

2. 谁在付费?

要成为 Gas Hero 中的领导者或在 PvP 中赢得一定级别的胜利,一个人需要先花费某些东西并装备好所需的装备,才足够具有竞争力。

首先,这些个体在成为有竞争力的高端玩家之前就预付款是有激励机制的,他们希望获得更大份额的回报 - 领导者从 NFT 市场费中获利,PvP 的赢家从拍卖行收入中获利。试图成为领导者但失败的玩家,以及在竞争中输掉的 PvP 玩家在支付这笔费用。

此外,选择财富体验路线的人实际上是流动性提供者,因为他们不断地在 PvE 资源/拍卖行中的商品与二级市场上列出的商品之间架起价格套利的桥梁。

3. 为什么人们会一直回来玩这个游戏?

Gas Hero 中有两个关键的设计概念:希望(Hope)和联系(Bonding)

希望(Hope)来自任何带有概率的事件:繁殖、升级、开启胶囊等。知道某事件的机会很低从未剥夺人们在实际获得低概率结果时的快乐。人们倾向于相信/希望他们是幸运的,当希望变为现实时会感到特别高兴。

联系(Bonding)是通过需要合作或竞争的活动赋予的。当人们知道一起完成团队任务可以使每个人都更好时,他们不仅会合作,甚至会吸引尚未合作的人加入他们的队伍。当一个人被实力接近他/她的人击败时,他/她很可能会想再试一次,并在下一次尝试中超越对手。

通过正确平衡希望和遗憾,以及玩家之间的充分联系,体验曲线将是波动的,但趋势向上。即使他们没有得到他们希望的结果(即成为管辖区领导者或赢得 PvP),他们会在下一个选举周期再次尝试,因为他们在途中收到了一些小的积极反馈,新的希望和旧的联系总是鼓励他们留下来。

更多关于 Gas Hero 的设计概念可以点击这里;

4. 为什么会有更多人对加入这个游戏感兴趣?

显然,作为一个社交/策略导向的金融游戏,钱非常重要,但这还有待真正的玩家揭示,所以我不会过多参与价格的讨论。

这个游戏世界会自然地吸引更多人加入,因为机制被设计为对那些能够事先就进行很好合作的人有利。当一个人被游戏提供的体验所吸引时,他有动力去为自己带来更多玩家,并教育他们关于游戏的知识,因为他们可以通过合作一起获得更好的体验。

5. 我们从 STEPN 中学到了什么,使 Gas Hero 成为一个好的博弈论模拟世界?

a) 资产的有限寿命 -> 非永续生产性资产+更好的资产周转/NFT 流动性

b) 多样化生产收益(从可替代代币转变为各种资源的 NFT)并将收益转化为衍生生产性资产 -> 增加了游戏策略的潜在深度

c) 季节性设置 -> 允许经济在进入长尾周期后完全复兴,为新玩家提供加入的空间

d) 实施一个允许市场力量自我调节的系统 -> 市场的“看不见的手”的制约与平衡是一个强大、灵活且可持续经济的基石

6. 接下来会发生什么?这对你来说为什么重要?

你可能仍对通过 Gas Hero 体验另一种生活并在权力、荣耀或财富中找到满足感持怀疑态度。

但是至少,你可能会想关注因为游戏锁定在链上的 GMT 的数量。只是让你知道(我甚至不打算深入讨论),拍卖行收入(游戏内初次销售的收入)的 25% 被销毁,而游戏内汇流(升级、繁殖、BCV 建设等)的一半也被销毁。做一些数学计算,你将看到整个 Find Satoshi Lab 社区所作的集体努力,将使 GMT 走上更远、更长的旅程。

你可以:

  1. 在 24 小时内,在https://d1x7dwosqaosdj.cloudfront.net/images/2024-01-02/43df97a19a4629283a0d1e1558476413上玩游戏;

  2. 来 Dune Dashboard:https://dune.com/0x hero/gh 查看游戏启动后更新总游戏内 GMT 锁定量和游戏资产交易量)。

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbitHá 1h

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbitHá 1h

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbitHá 2h

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbitHá 2h

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbitHá 2h

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片