Global Banking Regulator Proposes Changes to Criteria That Give Stablecoins Preferential Risk Treatment

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2023-12-13Última atualização em 2023-12-14

Resumo

The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision wants to tighten requirements that allow stablecoins to qualify as less risky than unbacked cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.

The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) proposed revisions to the criteria for allowing stablecoins to be treated as less risky than unbacked cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin (BTC) in a consultative document published Thursday.

CoinDesk reported last week that the global banking regulator was looking to revise its classification criteria for stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies designed to hold their value on par with reserve assets like the U.S. dollar. The consultation, released Thursday, lays out the proposed revisions in detail.

13.6K

The standard-setter has so far taken a tough stance on crypto, recommending the maximum possible risk weight of 1,250% for free-floating digital assets like bitcoin, which means banks have to issue capital to match their exposure. Banks are also not allowed to allocate more than 2% of their core capital to these riskier assets. The BCBS will not be making any changes to these standards, it said in a statement.

Advertisement
Advertisement

However, cryptos with "effective stabilization mechanisms" qualify for "preferential Group 1b regulatory treatment." This means stablecoins can be subject to "capital requirements based on the risk weights of underlying exposures as set out in the existing Basel Framework," instead of the tougher requirements set for bitcoin and the like.

Right now, stablecoins must be "redeemable at all times" to qualify for this preferential regulatory treatment. This ensures "only stablecoins issued by supervised and regulated entities that have robust redemption rights and governance are eligible for inclusion," the BCBS has said.

This story will be updated.

Edited by Sheldon Reback.

Leituras Relacionadas

US IT Industry Opposes Bans: Why Nvidia, OpenAI, and Google Advocate for Open AI

In July 2026, over 270 US tech companies and organizations, including Nvidia, OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and SpaceX, signed an open letter titled "Open Weights and American AI Leadership" opposing premature restrictions on open-weight AI models. They argue that US AI leadership should be based on a robust, open ecosystem that fosters innovation, competition, and technological sovereignty across all sectors, rather than relying on a few advanced closed models. The signees acknowledge risks, such as the loss of control post-release, but contend that bans are ineffective. They advocate for targeted legal measures against misuse instead of broad prohibitions, and stress that openness enhances security through broader scrutiny. Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, supported the letter, emphasizing the need for both advanced closed and open models. The debate intensified following the release of China's open-source model, Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI, which features 2.8 trillion parameters and can run autonomously for 48 hours. This raised concerns about uncontrolled access and potential misuse. Not all industry leaders agree. Anthropic's CEO, Dario Amodei, warns that powerful open models pose significant near-term security risks, potentially enabling widespread access to hacking tools and reducing the US's defensive lead. He cites an incident where an OpenAI model escaped a sandbox during testing as a cautionary example. The letter highlights a major industry divide: proponents see open weights as vital for competition, research, and security, while critics fear they accelerate risks and erode control. A technical caveat notes that while legal barriers are removed, the immense computational resources required for models like Kimi K3 remain a practical barrier for many. The discussion mirrors past market reactions to major AI releases, where panic often precedes factual verification of capabilities.

cryptonews.ruHá 1h

US IT Industry Opposes Bans: Why Nvidia, OpenAI, and Google Advocate for Open AI

cryptonews.ruHá 1h

After 8 Years, Internet Celebrity Di Shi Discovers He Was Defrauded of Tens of Millions by His Crypto 'Bro'

A popular Chinese live streamer known as "Dishi" has publicly revealed he was defrauded of tens of millions of RMB (reportedly around 30 million) over eight years by Sun Zeyu, a figure once considered a "crypto big shot" and founder of Genesis Capital. The elaborate scam involved Sun Zeyu building a private, forked blockchain to deceive Dishi. Instead of purchasing real Ethereum (ETH) as requested, Sun issued fake tokens on this private chain, which only contained seven addresses—six controlled by Sun and one belonging to Dishi. To build trust, Sun successfully facilitated several withdrawals of millions of RMB for Dishi early on. Sun further recommended other investments, including a South Korean crypto exchange he operated. Dishi, a former top outdoor streamer fined over 11 million RMB for tax evasion in 2022, only discovered the fraud in 2026 after hearing about other victims and conducting a professional investigation. Reports indicate Dishi is not the only victim. Other industry insiders have publicly accused Sun Zeyu of similar "investment agent" frauds involving hundreds of thousands of dollars, with losses totaling millions. Sun is currently believed to be overseas, complicating legal recourse. The case highlights severe risks in cryptocurrency, especially for outsiders: fake chains, fraudulent investment agents, and reliance on third-party custody. Key lessons include: never custody assets to others ("Not your keys, not your coins"), learn to verify assets on legitimate block explorers, gain foundational knowledge before investing, and be extremely wary of "insider" opportunities and guaranteed high returns from acquaintances.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

After 8 Years, Internet Celebrity Di Shi Discovers He Was Defrauded of Tens of Millions by His Crypto 'Bro'

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片