Crypto Provisions Dropped From 2023 U.S. Defense Bill

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2023-12-07Última atualização em 2023-12-08

Resumo

The military-linked bill is viewed as must-pass legislation, so lawmakers sometimes try to tack on other things to get them passed, too.

Two crypto provisions addressing anti-money-laundering concerns were dropped from a joint version of the National Defense Authorization Act, a military-funding bill viewed as must-pass legislation, ending a backdoor effort to get digital-asset rules passed this year in the U.S.

According to a joint bill published Thursday by lawmakers from the U.S. House and Senate, provisions that would create an anti-money-laundering examination standard for crypto assets and require a report analyzing the use of privacy coins or other "anonymity-enhancing technologies" in crypto were dropped. The House of Representatives version of the NDAA did not contain the provisions that the Senate version did.

The NDAA details the military budget for the upcoming year, though as one of the U.S.'s few must-pass bills, it's often amended with various other provisions.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Senate amendments included one for the Secretary of the Treasury "to establish a risk-focused examination and review process for financial institutions" to look at whether reporting obligations for crypto assets under money-laundering rules were adequate and whether firms were compliant.

The other would direct the Treasury Department to produce and publish a report on the use of mixers and tumblers, the magnitude of transactions using privacy tools, the extent to which sanctioned entities might be using those tools and more.

It would also direct the Treasury to come up with "recommendations for legislation or regulation relating to the technologies and services described."

Later on Thursday, Senators Mark Warner (D-Va.), Mitt Romney (R-Utah), Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) introduced a bill intended to expand U.S. sanctions rules to any parties that "facilitate financial transactions with terrorists," naming Hamas as one key example.

The bill focuses much of its attention on "foreign digital asset companies" that might process or otherwise support transactions to terror groups.

Edited by Nick Baker.

Leituras Relacionadas

Robinhood Chain's DeFi Long March: Replicating the Ethereum Classic, Reshaping the RWA Financial Landscape

Robinhood Chain is evolving from a primary hub for meme coins into a diversified DeFi ecosystem. Core DeFi primitives—AMM, CLOB, lending, perpetual contracts, ve(3,3), and OHM-style protocols—are being deployed and adapted for new assets, particularly tokenized stocks and RWAs. Key developments include Uniswap (V2/V3/V4) dominating as the core AMM and liquidity layer, with V4 enabling programmable pools. Deepstate introduces a fully on-chain order book (CLOB) model for efficient price discovery, suited for traditional assets. Lending protocols like Morpho and Arrow Finance allow users to earn yield on stablecoins and use tokenized stocks as collateral for loans. Perpetual DEXs like Lighter and Arcus support crypto and tokenized stocks as both trading pairs and margin collateral, with Arcus further tokenizing positions for DeFi composability. The ve(3,3) model is implemented by protocols like UponRH, which ties token emissions to actual trading fees, and Fables, which uses Uniswap V4 hooks for dynamic fee markets tailored to RWAs. NetNet offers an OHM-style reserve currency protocol with code-enforced parameters and a Risk-Free Value (RFV) backed by stable assets. The overarching trend is the growing composability of traditional financial assets (like stocks) within Robinhood Chain's DeFi landscape, moving beyond mere replication of existing models to create tailored financial infrastructure for RWAs.

marsbitHá 54m

Robinhood Chain's DeFi Long March: Replicating the Ethereum Classic, Reshaping the RWA Financial Landscape

marsbitHá 54m

The Battle for Control of the Tracks Enters the Second Half: Banks vs. Crypto, Who Will Have the Last Laugh?

The competition for control over the tokenization infrastructure, or the "rails," is intensifying, moving beyond initial asset listing to dominance over settlement, custody, and regulatory layers. Recent developments signal a shift in power towards traditional finance. Key evidence includes: the formation of the BankChain Alliance by 39 U.S. state banking associations to launch a banking-owned blockchain network; moves by market infrastructure giants like DTCC, ICE, and Citadel Securities to establish their own institutional-grade on-chain systems; the struggle of crypto-native custodians like ZeroHash (re-applying for a bank charter) and Copper (facing a severe valuation drop), highlighting that regulatory "license moats" are now more critical than technical advantages; and the launch of stablecoin USD1 by licensed trust bank BitGo on the permissioned Canton network, showing convergence of stablecoin issuance towards regulated entities. The analysis concludes this is not a simple "banks vs. crypto" battle but a redefinition of the foundational infrastructure. A clear division of labor is emerging: open public chains for DeFi and innovation, while bank-led consortium chains and licensed entities capture institutional settlement, tokenized deposits, and regulated custody. The defining question is no longer *if* an asset is tokenized, but *on which rails* it runs and *who controls* those rails, with regulation and牌照 providing the ultimate backstop.

marsbitHá 1h

The Battle for Control of the Tracks Enters the Second Half: Banks vs. Crypto, Who Will Have the Last Laugh?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片