UK's Proposed Crypto Rules Could Drive Away Foreign Firms, Lawyers Say

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2023-11-15Última atualização em 2023-11-16

Resumo

The government has said it won't extend certain regulatory exemptions reserved for foreign TradFi firms to crypto, potentially making it tougher for companies to enter the mar...

  • Crypto industry stakeholders have asked the U.K. government to consider extending regulatory exceptions for foreign TradFi firms to crypto.
  • The U.K. government has said it doesn’t plan to do so.
  • The tough requirements on foreign crypto firms could drive business away from the aspiring digital asset hub, lawyers told CoinDesk.
14.3K

The U.K. government plans to apply its upcoming crypto rules to all firms, without exception, a decision lawyers say could drive international companies out of the market.

Industry stakeholders have called for the government – which has said it wants to turn the U.K. into a global hub for crypto – to grant some regulatory exceptions for foreign crypto firms looking to operate in the country. In particular, they want it to expand the scope of overseas persons exclusions (OPE) to include crypto.

The OPE allows some traditional financial institutions (like multilateral trading facilities that exchange financial instruments) to operate without authorization. For example, the OPE can be used when the regulated activity is done “with or through” an authorized or exempt person.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

The industry requests were made during a government consultation on crypto regulation, and in its response, the government made it clear that it was not planning to extend the OPE to crypto.

Choosing not to make those exceptions, however, could stifle international firms’ willingness to operate in the U.K., said Albert Weatherill, a partner at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright during an interview with CoinDesk.

"The removal of the OPE, I think, is a bit of a blow – in my opinion – for the industry," Weatherill said.

Harsher rules for crypto

The government doesn’t want to extend the OPE to crypto because "the context of crypto asset markets is not the same as those for traditional financial products to which the OPE already applies," it said in its consultation response.

The government's position is that firms that deal with U.K. retail consumers should be required to be authorized regardless of where they are located.

"It often isn’t possible to use the OPE if you provide services to retail clients," Hannah Meakin, also a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright told CoinDesk in a statement.

However, "what the government is actually doing is blocking use of the OPE for crypto to any overseas person, even if they’re only doing institutional business," Meakin said. "Perhaps the government thinks there is a different solution, such as deference or equivalence, but we are still waiting to see any details on this."

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

CoinDesk also reached out to the U.K. Treasury for more clarity but did not hear back before press time.

"They could have just narrowed the overseas persons exclusions more to say it's only available for wholesale transactions but they haven't," said Diego Ballon Ossio, partner at law firm Clifford Chance. "So I think that's a missed opportunity."

U.K. regulators plan on supervising crypto in phases, starting with stablecoin legislation coming early next year with policies for the wider crypto sector coming later. It has already passed legislation that treats crypto as a regulated activity under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.

The government wants international crypto trading firms to have to set up a U.K. branch if they want to get authorized to operate in the country, but companies may simply decide it’s "not worth the hassle," Weatherill said.

"If you are an exchange that's very active in Asia your client base is not normally here, but you've got lots of liquidity, why would you want to get a branch here if you have to go through the pain of setting up the brands, hiring people, etc..?" Ballon Ossio said.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Edited by Sandali Handagama.


Leituras Relacionadas

Dallas Fed Economists Warn of Risks from Tokenized Deposits

Economists from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas have warned about the potential risks of widespread adoption of tokenized deposits. They argue that while enabling real-time settlements, tokenization could destabilize bank funding models. The ease of instant transfers between institutions may reduce deposit stability, making it harder for banks to forecast balances and forcing them to hold more high-quality liquid assets. This shift could limit banks' capacity for long-term lending and increase borrowing costs. Using a model, the economists estimate that a 10% decrease in the average maturity of bank deposits could reduce the banking system's ability to hold interest rate risk by approximately $580 billion (in 10-year asset equivalents). A 10% increase in the sensitivity of deposit rates to market rates could have an even larger impact of around $700 billion. They cite Brazil's Pix instant payment system as an analogous case where increased usage correlated with banks holding more liquid assets and reducing credit intermediation. The analysis comes as major banks accelerate tokenization projects, such as the formation of the BankChain alliance and infrastructure initiatives by JPMorgan, Citigroup, and others. The authors conclude that while the sector is nascent, the architecture and rules of future tokenized deposit systems will be crucial in determining their ultimate impact on financial stability.

cryptonews.ruHá 13m

Dallas Fed Economists Warn of Risks from Tokenized Deposits

cryptonews.ruHá 13m

Trading

Spot
活动图片