CFTC Chief: Nothing Changed After FTX Meltdown to Empower Agency to Prevent Repeat

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2023-11-14Última atualização em 2023-11-15

Resumo

U.S. CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam says his agency is still awaiting new authorities from Congress to get supervision power over the crypto markets.

U.S. regulators don't have any more authority now to head off another major crypto collapse than they did when FTX imploded and took much of the industry with it, said Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Rostin Behnam.

"Nothing has changed, and we could be in a position where another FTX-type event happens," Behnam said Wednesday at the Financial Markets Quality Conference 2023 at Georgetown University. However, he noted that the crypto investing enthusiasm has calmed since the months before FTX, and "the market environment is much, much different today than it was a year ago."

14K

He noted – as he routinely does – that the CFTC has limited powers over the markets in which assets such as bitcoin trade directly. In that spot market, his agency only has the authority to intervene when market-manipulation and fraudulent activity is pointed out to the regulators. CFTC officials don't have the reach they do in the crypto derivatives sector, where they can assess companies' registrations and supervise their behaviors directly. And the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) only polices the securities markets.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

While SEC Chair Gary Gensler has repeatedly said he believes the bulk of crypto tokens are securities, there are some cryptocurrencies, like bitcoin, that don't fall under that regulator's jurisdiction. Behnam also puts ether on that list, noting Wednesday that the non-security crypto tokens make up "easily 50% – if not more – of the marketplace."

Legislation

Since FTX, U.S. lawmakers have pursued legislation to give the CFTC jurisdiction over direct, cash markets, but those crypto market-structure bills still await action. One of them was approved by committees in the House of Representatives and would need a vote from the overall chamber, but the Republican-led effort so far lacks support in the Democrat-controlled Senate.

"There's obviously a lot going on in Congress these days," Behnam said. "These bills have been caught, I think a little bit in a holding pattern."

Crypto lobbyists had hoped that crypto bills – also including one that would set up U.S. guardrails for stablecoin issuers – would get a House floor vote before the end of the year. But Congress has largely been occupied with keeping the federal government open as lawmakers hash out spending bills, and the House was recently sidetracked after Republicans ousted former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and replaced him with Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.).

Prediction markets

The CFTC chief also addressed his agency's court fight with prediction market Kalshi over political-outcomes betting. His agency has opposed Kalshi's election contracts and was taken to court over that decision, depending in part on deciding whether there's societal value in hedging political risk by being able to engage in contracts that pay if – for instance – a certain person or party is elected.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

"If there are allegations of fraud or manipulation in an election – whether it's a local district in Iowa, or any other state – you can imagine we then become an election cop," said Behnam. "If there's a listed futures or unlisted derivative on an election and there's an allegation of fraud in that election, that fraud would presumably have affected the price revaluation of the listed future."

He said he doesn't want the CFTC to have to assume that role in U.S. elections.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Leituras Relacionadas

Dan Koe: The Counterintuitive Truth—You Don't Need to Remember Everything You Read

Dan Koe: The Counterintuitive Truth — You Don't Need to Remember Everything You Read The central idea is that deliberately trying to remember information is often misguided. True learning isn't about memorizing facts but about having important knowledge surface naturally when needed through use. Most forgetting is normal, not a failure. The article reframes learning using a control theory framework—a four-step feedback loop: having a clear Goal, accurately Sensing your current state, Comparing the gap, and Acting to close it. Most learning stalls because people only do step 2 (blind input) without a goal to create the necessary "error signal" for focused action. The most effective method is to start with output, not input. Begin a meaningful personal project first, and learn only what's necessary to complete it. This project-driven, "just-in-time" learning ensures knowledge is contextual and retained. The concept of a "Second Brain" often fails because it becomes a digital graveyard—over-collected and under-utilized. The goal should be building a "Second Subconscious"—a dynamic system that proactively surfaces relevant ideas during creation, not a static storage vault. Tools like Obsidian+Claude or Eden can help by automating organization and enabling semantic search, but their value depends on linking knowledge to active projects. Ultimately, what matters is not what you store, but what you filter and internalize. Focus on ideas that shape your worldview, use projects as filters, and transform collected material through writing and sharing. AI should be used to reduce friction in research and editing, not to formulate your core views. In conclusion, remembering is a byproduct, not the goal. Knowledge that sticks comes from pursuing personal goals, applying it in real projects, and digesting it through creation. The tools are merely aids; the crucial step is to start doing meaningful work and let the necessary knowledge find you.

marsbitHá 1h

Dan Koe: The Counterintuitive Truth—You Don't Need to Remember Everything You Read

marsbitHá 1h

A New Era: The Fundamental Transformation of China's Entrepreneurs

A profound generational shift is underway among Chinese entrepreneurs. The wealth and influence once dominated by real estate and internet giants is now being claimed by a new wave of founders driving breakthroughs in AI, semiconductors, and robotics. This change is vividly reflected in 2026's wealth rankings. Figures like Zhang Yiming (ByteDance), Liang Wenfeng (DeepSeek), Chen Tianshi (Cambricon), and Wang Xingxing (Unitree Robotics) are ascending. Their wealth stems not from traditional business models but from market expectations for future technological competitiveness, with AI, chips, and smart hardware becoming the primary engines of wealth creation. Their common trait is a foundational focus on technology, often starting from the laboratory rather than a business plan. Examples include Chen Tianshi's decade-long push in AI chips, Liang Wenfeng's core algorithmic innovations at DeepSeek with a compact team, and Zhu Yiming's "no salary until profitable" 9-year journey to build Changxin Memory into a global DRAM player. This transition marks a fundamental shift in China's economic imperative: from commercial expansion and learning to indigenous innovation and deep industrial capability. While the previous generation built the foundational market and infrastructure, this new cohort is tasked with achieving global leadership in core technologies, moving China from "keeping pace" to pioneering original, breakthrough innovations that are industrialized at scale. The baton is being passed to those competing on the world stage through technological originality.

marsbitHá 1h

A New Era: The Fundamental Transformation of China's Entrepreneurs

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片