Consensys Fellowship 首批学员报到，围观 Web3 工具赛道的奇思妙想

foresightnewsPublicado em 2023-11-13Última atualização em 2023-11-14

Resumo

如何利用智能合约执行支持退款的交易？

作为一家基础设施公司，Consensys 支持的初创企业也大都将重心放在工具类应用。


撰文：Peng SUN，Foresight News


Consensys 于 9 月 20 日宣布推出 Consensys Fellowship 计划，旨在支持与 MetaMask SDK、MetaMask Snaps 和 Linea 有关的产品的初创公司。加入该计划的初创公司有机会获得高达 150 万美元的投资，由 Consensys Mesh 和 Tachyon 提供资金。Consensys 希望加入的公司将目标放在使 Web3 更加易于访问和功能多样化的可扩展性、简化开发流程的工具以及以太坊和 EVM 兼容链的 L2 解决方案三个方面。


就在上周二，Consensys 公布了首批入选 Fellowship 计划的 16 家公司，正如 Consensys 所期望的，这些初创公司的主要业务都集中在产品工具这一点上：


Common Ground


Common Ground 是一个 Web3 社区平台，支持聊天、会议、论坛和生态间的协调。Common Ground 支持多链、去中心化身份以及代币控制和 NFT 等，用户可以使用 X 账户、邮箱和加密货币钱包登录，登录之后可以绑定用户自己的 X 账户。



该产品的使用体验接近于 Discord，但在社区内提供了类似博客的功能，社区创建者可以在独立的板块发布内容而不影响到社区内的交流氛围。



Common Ground 的联合创始人兼首席执行官 Florian Glatz 是 European Crypto Initiative 副总裁，同时也是一名加密货币领域的律师。


Butter


Butter 是一个 DAO 治理工具，推出了名为 Molten 的 DAO 治理系统。Molten 是一个旨在通过使得腐败无利可图的激励措施来解决 DAO 治理中与投票权中心化风险的系统。


Butter 认为当前的 DAO 治理面对两大核心问题：腐败和治理攻击。其中腐败可能导致少数掌握大量选票的利益群体为满足自身利益损害 DAO 的长期价值；治理攻击则是因治理机制存在漏洞，从而被攻击者利用从 DAO 中盗取资金。



Molten 提供了一种新的治理系统，允许 DAO 中的「代表」为某项提案创建一个委托合约，该合约允许持有治理代币的投票者将代币存入合约中，以将投票权赋予「代表」。该委托合约被称为 Molten Pot，Molten Pot 需要 DAO 为其设置一个阈值，当委托票数超过某一阈值时，该合约将被激活，同时同类的其他合约将被中止。


Molten 的模式使得对于某一 DAO 提案只有一个「代表」可以代表大多数投票者的利益，而 DAO 也将向该合约中存入一定量的奖励以激励投票者积极参与治理。


投票者在将治理代币存入治理代币时，可以获得等量的 mToken 代表存入合约的治理代币份额。若最终「代表」成功执行了投票任务，投票者将依据份额分享 DAO 存入合约的奖励。


Butter 认为，采用 Molten 系统可以通过激励使得大量分散的投票集中到「代表」手中，从而防止投票被持有大量票数的少数群体操纵。


Bonadocs


Bonadocs 简化了智能合约集成与协作，精简了工作流程、文档和智能合约集成等方面的工作。



Tezoro


Tezoro 旨在解决因无法登录钱包或因意外原因失去对钱包控制的情况。用户将设置一个在上述情况发生时将资产转移的目标地址，可以由用户自己或其他钱包地址执行转移，或在提前设置好的情况发生时（如连续 30 日未发生转账或与合约交互）转移资产。以上动作均由智能合约执行。


Denota


Denota 提供了利用 NFT 支持撤回付款的支付方案，旨在在欺诈行为发生时付款方可以撤回付出的资金。


Denota 提供的方案包含两种模式：承保模型和抵押模型。


在承保模型中，付款方在支付款项后再支付一定的「保费」并生成一个包含了风险参数信息「nota」NFT 合约，由流动性提供者提供的「reserve pool」对此次交易承保。若在时限内未发生退款，则无事发生。若发生欺诈等行为导致付款者需要回收资金，付款者可以以一定比例的折价向资金池出售 NFT，折价的程度取决于交易本身的风险。



在抵押模型中，付款方在支付款项后同样会生成一个「nota」NFT 合约，但这个 NFT 合约会将锁定与支付金额等量的资产。若发生退款，则锁定的资产将会全数退还给付款方以保证付款方获得最大的保护。该方案中存在一个「二级市场」用于折价收购所有的 NFT，若没有发生退款，则锁定期限结束后二级市场资金池将会获得所有的资金，若发生退款，则该资金池将损失购买 NFT 的资金。



Toaster Finance


Toaster Finance 是一个一站式 DeFi 平台，用户可以通过该应用直接进行跨链、交易以及投入 DeFi 协议产生收益而无需切换多个应用。



PADO


PADO 允许用户以真实且保护隐私的方式证明其链下数据，并进一步创建数据证明，可供第三方共享和访问。例如，您可以向 GameFi 协议证明您是 MOBA 游戏的高级玩家，而无需透露您的个人信息。PADO 采用为互联网通信提供隐私和数据完整性的安全协议 MPC-TSL 与保护隐私的采用零知识证明的 IZK 协议来实现上述功能。



Noves


Noves 是一个区块链数据工具，其产品包括 Translate API 和 Foresight API。Translate API 可以帮助用户了解协议支持的链上的交易内容，Foresight API 则是帮助了解未确认交易将带来的影响。Noves 的特点是无需开发者在获取每一条链上的交易内容时进行重复开发，而时利用 Noves 的标准化工具获取所有的支持的链上的交易信息。


zkUSD


zkUSD 是一个基于 zk-SNARK 的稳定币项目，用户可以抵押 NEON 铸造 zkUSD，并使用 zkUSD 来提高交易的隐私性。此外，zkUSD 旗下产品还包括合规隐私交易结算层 Vala，Vala 是一个 Layer 3 解决方案，通过 DApp 的方式呈现，用户可使用 Vala 进行隐私交易并采用零知识证明技术在不透露完整交易历史的前提下证明资金的合法性。



Epoch Protocol


Epoch Protocol 是一个交易自动化解决方案，通过账户抽象提供了一个统一的平台来自动化 Web3 自动交易组件，无论是基于链上事件、链下触发器还是基于时间的操作。Epoch 提供了可插拔的解决方案，支持批量处理多个交易以适应多样化的需求。此外，Epoch 通过链上验证增加了额外的安全性。


Greg


Greg 提供了便捷的 Web3 钱包登录体验，用户无需生成助记词等繁杂的步骤，仅需要输入邮箱并获取验证码即可登录钱包。目前包括 CoinLivre、NForests、SoulPrime 在内的项目均采用了 Greg 的方案。


Taigalabs


Taigalabs 的官网极其简陋，其团队成员在官网自述称 Taigalabs 是一个计算技术研发小组，目前致力于探索可验证计算，尤其是用户在客户端创建 ZK 证明方面。


Relayer


Relayer 是一个 Web3 广告基础设施，可以帮助项目依据用户在链上的行为提供定制化的奖励来达到更好的营销效果。


Holder


Holder是一个 Web3 CRM（客户关系管理）和营销自动化平台，其产品包括支持链上和链下的 Web3 表单、根据链上和链下数据对受众进行细分以及自动向社区推送更新的工具。



Xtremely


Xtremely 通过其「Dynamic Graph-as-a-Service（动态图即服务）」工具来优化交易路径及套利。该项目未列出官网。


Caddie


Caddie是一个交易聚合器，不仅聚合了来自 DEX 的流动性，同时也聚合了来自 CEX 的流动性，旨在提供最佳的交易执行价格。其支持的 DEX 聚合器包括 LI.FI、KyberSwap、1inch、OpenOcean、Matcha 等，支持的 CEX 则包括了币安、Kraken、KuCoin 等。

Leituras Relacionadas

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbitHá 25m

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbitHá 25m

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbitHá 36m

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbitHá 36m

A Country That Mined Bitcoin for 8 Years Has Built Its Own Dedicated Crypto Bank

A country that has been mining Bitcoin for eight years has established its own dedicated crypto bank. DK Bank, located in Bhutan's newly developed GMC special administrative zone, aims to fill the significant banking service gap for the cryptocurrency industry. Its CEO, Zheng YD, explained that most banks avoid crypto businesses due to a lack of risk management frameworks for decentralized and anonymous protocols. Operating under a unique "one country, two systems" governance model separate from mainland Bhutan, GMC aspires to become a financial hub for South Asia. DK Bank differentiates itself by offering integrated multi-currency accounts where users can manage both fiat currencies and stablecoins like USDT and USDC in one place, alongside services like Bitcoin-backed loans. The bank faces technical challenges in merging traditional banking systems with 24/7 crypto markets and implements rigorous on-chain and off-chain transaction monitoring for risk control. GMC's regulatory framework draws from Singaporean common law and Abu Dhabi's ADGM rules, offering a fast-track licensing process for already licensed firms while maintaining high standards. The initiative is part of Bhutan's longer-term crypto strategy, which includes Bitcoin mining since 2018. The focus, however, is on building a diversified institutional-grade crypto ecosystem—including custody and asset management—rather than retail speculative tokens. Proponents argue such sovereign crypto infrastructure is necessary, and Bhutan's early, measured approach exemplifies the thoughtful integration needed in global finance.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

A Country That Mined Bitcoin for 8 Years Has Built Its Own Dedicated Crypto Bank

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Kraken Launches CFTC-Regulated Perpetual Futures For US Pro Traders

Kraken has launched U.S. CFTC-regulated perpetual futures contracts for eligible institutional and professional clients, making a core crypto derivatives product available on a compliant domestic platform. The contracts, for assets including BTC, ETH, and SOL, are offered via Kraken Pro with clearing through a registered Futures Commission Merchant. This move brings the popular perpetual futures format, which allows leveraged trading without an expiry date, into the stricter U.S. regulatory framework. It provides professional traders a potential alternative to offshore platforms, balancing regulatory comfort with access to key products. However, the launch is explicitly not for retail investors. Its success depends on whether Kraken can build sufficient liquidity to compete with dominant offshore venues on metrics like spreads and execution quality. While symbolically significant for U.S. market maturity, its practical impact hinges on attracting meaningful trading activity onshore.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Kraken Launches CFTC-Regulated Perpetual Futures For US Pro Traders

bitcoinistHá 1h

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbitHá 1h

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow