历时半年完成铸造,sats迎来高光时刻

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2023-11-03Última atualização em 2023-11-03

Resumo

过去两天,sats最高涨幅250%。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Loopy

历时半年完成铸造,sats迎来高光时刻

近日,BRC-20 代币 sats 持续上涨。Coingecko 数据显示,在过去的半个月,sats 价格长期徘徊在 0.00000002 USDT 附近,而在近两日价格迅速攀升,最高突破 0.00000007 USDT ,最高涨幅近 250% 。最近一段时间,BRC-20 市场发生了什么?

历时半年完成铸造,sats迎来高光时刻

不可能铸造完的 meme 币

提起 sats,人们对它最大的印象,是其无比庞大的供应量。sats 总供应量 2,100,000,000,000,000枚,即 2100 万亿枚,是比特币的一亿倍。

也因此,在推出之初,许多用户并不相信这一 BRC-20 代币最终会被完全铸造。但用户的热情是强大的,sats 这个拥有中本聪之名的 meme,最终还是被全部铸造完成。

9 月 24 日, sats 的铸造进度达到 100% ,总铸造次数达 21,107,258 次,持有人达 36061 人,铸造自 2023 年 3 月 9 日开始,共耗时 6 个月。

历时半年完成铸造,sats迎来高光时刻

从参与人数来看,sats 足够多,这在一定程度上代表着足够“去中心化”。而且代币名字本身就是一种“先天优势”,这也让 sats 在 meme 赛道的竞争中具有一定的优势。

Meme 币转身成效用代币

随着 sats 社区规模的扩大,BRC 20 生态最大的钱包开发商 UniSat 也看上了这块「香饽饽」。UniSat 团队试图为 sats 赋能,增加应用场景。(Odaily 注:UniSat Wallet 是一款用于 BTC 生态的 Chrome 插件钱包,帮助用户存储、铸造和传输 BRC-20 代币,包括买卖 BTC、NFT、域名等。)

Meme 币“赋能”的故事,在加密世界并不是第一次发生,此前 DOGE、SHIB 都曾因“发链”而一度引发市场热议。而本次的故事则来自于 swap 的手续费消耗。在 UniSat 最新上线的 brc20-swap中,sats 将被作为手续费收取,而这将使用户消耗大量 sats。

UniSat Wallet 表示,brc20-swap 将向所有参与交易的用户收取 0.3% 的服务费,该费用中大约 1/6 (0.05%)由 UniSat 收取,其余 5/6(0.25%)则分配给各个交易对的所有流动性提供商。该费用结构主要基于 UniSwap 当前使用的费率标准。在手续费的使用上,UniSat 将把收入的 2% 捐赠给 L1F(Layer1 Foundation)。此外,UniSat 将开放 brc20-swap 的完整解释和验证源代码,以促进索引器的早期支持。

目前来看,brc-20 协议乃至整个 Ordinals 生态依然处于早期,UniSat 占据极大的市场份额和影响力。sats 被 UniSat 看好,也为自身提供了极大的利好预期。OKX 数据显示,sats 过去 24 小时创造了约 200 万美元交易量。

历时半年完成铸造,sats迎来高光时刻

brc 20-swap 上线一波三折

此前,由于“原始”的用户体验和糟糕的流动性,brc-20 代币仍属于“小圈子”式的小众赛道,基础设施的匮乏让 EVM 巨鲸们难以入场。UniSat 的 brc20-swap开放,为更多用户进入比特币生态交易 BRC-20 代币打开了通道,该产品的问世也经历了一番挫折。

9 月 27 日,UniSat Wallet 宣布推出 brc 20-swap 测试网,用户可以在其测试网上铸造 BRC-20 代币、存款、交易和增加流动性。

10 月 10 日,UniSat Wallet 公布 brc20-swap 主网发布时间表,计划在 10 月 25 日上线。

10 月 22 日,UniSat 自身遇到了技术困境。有用户发现,不同的市场正在使用不同版本的 ord,它们索引不同的铭文编号。在 Magic Eden、OKX 和 UniSat Wallet 都使用相同的序数之前,交易 BRC-20 存在双花风险。

UniSat 随后在 X 发文回应:“我们已经注意到由于 ord 软件版本不同,导致出现 BRC-20 索引不匹配的情况。UniSat Wallet 和服务与当前的 ord 0.9 版本保持一致,确保正确匹配 ordinals.com 的结果。我们正在监控贡献者和索引编制者的工作,并将及时通知我们的用户。”同日,Magic Eden 暂停了 BRC-20 交易。

10 月 25 日,已到 brc20-swap 原定的主网上线时间。但 UniSat 推迟了该产品的上线,将其主网上线时间推迟至 10 月 31 日,同时表示,在最初的主网启动期间,团队将继续免费分发 Prime Access;随着更多用户的加入,团队将密切监控系统的性能并及时解决可能出现的任何问题;经过一系列迭代,最终将向所有用户开放所有功能。

北京时间 11 月 1 日,brc 20-swap 主网正式上线。不过,与常见的“无需许可”DEX 有所不同,brc20-swap目前仍需一定意义的“许可”后才可开启交易。

在首批上线的资产中,UniSat 将 14 种铭文资产纳入 brc20-swap主网上线首批支持名单,分别为:sats、ordi、trac、oshi、btcs、oxbt、texo、cncl、meme、honk、.bit、vmpx、pepe、mxrc。具体来说,资产开放交易采用“按需交易”的模式:只有当新的用户向 brc20-swap 中存入相关资产,提现请求才能使用。

BRC-20 生态能走多远,现在下定论似乎还为时过早,不妨让子弹飞一会儿,静待发展。

Leituras Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHá 2h

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHá 2h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHá 2h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHá 2h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 3h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 3h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 3h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片