Hong Kong Will Allow Some Tokenized Securities-Related Activities

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2023-11-01Última atualização em 2023-11-02

Resumo

The move appears to be another step in Hong Kong's recently accelerated ambitions to become a virtual asset hub.

Hong Kong is set to allow primary dealing of tokenization by providing more guidance on tokenized securities-related activities, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) announced on Thursday.

“The SFC is of the view that it is appropriate to allow primary dealing of tokenized SFC-authorised investment products, as long as the underlying product can meet all the applicable product authorization requirements and the additional safeguards to address the new risks associated with the tokenization arrangement,” one of the two SFC announcements meant to be read together said.

The move appears to be another step in Hong Kong’s recently accelerated ambitions to become a virtual asset hub. It implemented a new regulatory regime in June, accepting applications for crypto trading platform licenses, and granted the first set in August, allowing exchanges to serve retail customers.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

This was a U-turn after 18 months of hostility toward crypto. The latest move supersedes a statement from March 2019 when the SFC took the stance that security tokens were “complex products” and, therefore, extra investor protection measures would apply.

“SFC has been assessing various proposals on tokenization of SFC-authorised investment products, for example, some for primary dealing of a tokenized product (i.e., subscription and redemption) and some for secondary trading of a tokenized product on an SFC-licensed virtual asset trading platform,” the SFC said.

Tokenization is the process of creating blockchain-based tokens that represent ownership in an investment product, and with some market participants in Hong Kong already exploring it, the SFC said its “potential benefits” include increasing “efficiency, enhancing transparency, reducing settlement time and lowering costs for traditional finance.”

The SFC said those interested in any activities involving any Digital Securities (including Tokenised Securities) should discuss their business plans with their case officer in advance. While the SFC might consider applications by crypto trading platforms to exclude specific tokenized securities, it will require all operators to put in place a compensation arrangement to cover the potential loss of security tokens.

Hong Kong recently allowed intermediaries to sell spot products to a broader range of clients, not just to professional investors. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority had said tokenization could enhance efficiency, liquidity and transparency in bond markets a few months after a successful $100 million tokenized green bond issuance by its central bank.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.




Leituras Relacionadas

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

**Summary: South Korea's Institutional Crypto Race: Stablecoins and RWA Take Off** South Korea is undergoing a structural shift in its crypto ecosystem, moving beyond its historical role as a major retail trading hub. Major financial institutions and internet platforms are now building institutional-grade blockchain infrastructure, with stablecoins and Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization as the primary drivers. The push for a regulated Korean won stablecoin market is a major policy and corporate focus. This is driven partly by an estimated $115 billion outflow into dollar stablecoins like USDC, threatening the domestic financial system. Banks (e.g., KB Financial, Hana), payment giants (e.g., Shinhan Card, BC Card), and internet super-apps (KakaoPay, NAVER Pay) are all conducting pilots. The goal is to anchor future digital finance to the Korean won and local regulations. In RWA, South Korea is advancing rapidly within regulatory sandboxes, focusing on unique domestic assets beyond typical global templates like US Treasuries. Projects involve tokenizing ships (with Hyundai Heavy Industries), defense supply chain assets, and K-pop intellectual property, alongside more conventional assets. A legal framework is set for 2027, and platforms like NXT are preparing for regulated trading. Key opportunities for crypto-native projects lie in providing the underlying technology these traditional institutions lack: global distribution channels for tokenized assets, cross-chain liquidity solutions, and enabling infrastructure tools (e.g., for asset packaging and management). Partnerships, such as Solana with Shinhan Card or LayerZero with the Korea Gold Exchange, exemplify this proactive approach. Crucially, user access is being shaped by consumer platforms. NAVER's planned acquisition of Upbit's operator Dunamu and Kakao's development of a unified wallet aim to seamlessly integrate crypto with everyday payments for tens of millions of users. The race is now about which protocols and projects will become the foundational standards as regulation solidifies and institutional adoption accelerates.

Foresight NewsHá 41m

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

Foresight NewsHá 41m

How to Detect AI-Generated Videos? A Review of Dynamic, Traceable, and Explainable Detection Systems

**How to Detect AI-Generated Videos: A Survey on Dynamic, Traceable, and Explainable Detection Systems** With rapid advances in AI video generation (e.g., Sora, Veo), creating highly realistic, multi-minute videos is now possible, widening the gap with detection research. Current AI video detection, often limited to unreliable binary classifications, is insufficient. This survey, accepted at ACL 2026, reframes the goal as **"factual fidelity verification"**—checking if a video's content (who, when, where, what) aligns with the real world perceptually and cognitively. It categorizes AI-generated videos into three paradigms: **Local Manipulation Videos (LMV**, e.g., face swaps), **Audio-Visual Editing (AVE**, e.g., lip-syncing), and **Generative Video Synthesis (GVS**, fully synthetic videos like Sora's). Detection challenges evolve from visual artifacts in LMV to multi-modal inconsistencies in AVE and higher-level world knowledge violations in GVS. The core proposal is a **Vision-Language Dual-View framework** with four hierarchical layers: 1. **Layer 1 (Intrinsic Visual Cues):** Analyzes low-level signal statistics, noise patterns, and physiological signals. 2. **Layer 2 (Spatiotemporal Consistency):** Checks for temporal coherence in object motion and scene dynamics. 3. **Layer 3 (Cross-Modal Consistency):** Verifies alignment between video, audio, and text within the video. 4. **Layer 4 (Language-Guided World-Level Reasoning):** Uses external knowledge, facts, and physical laws to judge semantic plausibility and factual correctness. The survey traces a shift in detection focus from lower layers (1 & 2) toward higher, language-involved layers (3 & 4). It also reviews evolving evaluation metrics and datasets tailored for each video paradigm. The conclusion advocates for a **dynamic, evidence-first detection system** that moves beyond simple classification. Future trustworthy detection requires combining visual evidence (from CV) with semantic reasoning and explanation (from NLP & multimodal AI), ultimately creating traceable and explainable judgments about a video's adherence to real-world constraints.

marsbitHá 1h

How to Detect AI-Generated Videos? A Review of Dynamic, Traceable, and Explainable Detection Systems

marsbitHá 1h

It Turns Out the First Real-World Application of AI x Crypto is in Security Auditing

The article explores the surprising trend where AI's first major impact on crypto has been in security auditing, not in areas like trading or analytics. It details how AI-powered tools are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding smart contract vulnerabilities, enabling attackers to scan thousands of contracts and execute exploits within minutes. This has rendered traditional, manually-produced audit reports with their month-long validity periods increasingly obsolete, creating a critical "structural crack" in the old security model. Cases like Drift Protocol and KelpDAO show that even extensively audited protocols can be hacked through social engineering, operational flaws, or infrastructure misconfigurations beyond pure code review. Attackers are also using AI to find and exploit vulnerabilities in years-old, deployed contracts. Notably, OpenZeppelin's co-founder has expressed a grim view that "all DeFi is insecure" due to AI's asymmetric advantage. In response, the audit industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. While there's a short-term spike in defensive re-audits, the long-term business model is changing. Firms are developing AI-assisted systems and moving from one-time report deliveries towards embedded, continuous services like real-time monitoring and formal verification. Examples include AI tools uncovering critical, previously missed vulnerabilities in heavily audited protocols like Curve Finance and Zcash. The conclusion is that security must become a continuous investment, not a one-time checkbox, and audit firms must rapidly evolve their tools and service models to survive.

marsbitHá 1h

It Turns Out the First Real-World Application of AI x Crypto is in Security Auditing

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片