Bitget Wallet升级「MEV 保护」功能,进一步提升Swap交易的使用体验

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2023-11-02Última atualização em 2023-11-02

Resumo

当用户通过Bitget Swap进行以太坊链上代币交易时,系统会默认开启「MEV 保护」。

Bitget Wallet(原 BitKeep 钱包)近期在 App 内升级了以太坊链上交易的 MEV 保护机制,解决以太坊网络中的恶意 MEV 问题,为用户提供更加安全方便的链上交易体验。

当用户通过钱包内置的 DEX 聚合器 —— Bitget Swap 进行以太坊链上代币交易时,系统会默认开启「MEV 保护」功能,有效规避“抢先交易”和“三明治攻击”等潜在风险。另外,通过 Flashbots 的 MEV-Share 协议,交易过程中产生的 MEV 收益将自动返还给用户,实现用户的利益最大化,而用户无需进行任何额外操作。

MEV 是一种在创建新区块时增删交易或对交易进行重新排序的策略,可以产生潜在盈利空间,恶意参与者通过利用这些盈利空间获得回报,但却给其他用户带来资产损失。Flashbots 一直致力于解决这一问题,大幅降低 MEV 和前置运行策略的不利影响,以实现更加高效、去中心化和公正的链上环境。

早在今年年初,Bitget Wallet 就已在其 Swap 功能中接入 Flashbots 的技术服务,以提升链上交易隐私和安全性。Flashbots Bundle 交易打包策略帮助 Bitget Wallet 优化了交易执行顺序,确保了交易的优先级,避免因交易执行顺序变化导致的恶意 MEV 攻击问题,同时也降低了交易滑点。在 Bitget Wallet 最新版本中,「MEV 保护」功能更为直观,让用户能够更为清晰地感知到这些安全措施。

通过双方的合作,Bitget Wallet 将与 Flashbots 共同为市场减少恶意 MEV 的负面影响,提高交易的整体安全性,帮用户避免恶意策略的侵扰,同时优化交易成本,避免不必要的额外支出。在此基础上构建一个公正透明的 DeFi 生态,推动以太坊生态系统的公平和可持续发展。

Bitget Wallet 以 Swap 交易为核心功能,致力于成为最好用的 Web3 交易钱包,对 MEV 保护机制的重视,进一步展示了其对提供绝佳链上交易体验的追求。

关于 Bitget Wallet(Web3 多链钱包)

Bitget Wallet,原 BitKeep 钱包,亚洲最大、全球领先的一站式 Web3 多链钱包。为用户提供包括钱包、Swap 交易、NFT 交易、DApp 浏览器等全方位的链上产品和 DeFi 服务。

成立 5 年以来,因安全便捷的产品和服务,获得全球 1200 万用户以及以太坊、BNB Chain、Arbitrum、Polygon 等数百个行业头部项目的认可与支持。

2023 年 3 月,加密衍生品交易平台 Bitget 向 BitKeep 投资 3000 万美元,成为控股股东;8 月,BitKeep 正式品牌升级更名为 Bitget Wallet,产品和服务全新升级,以“交易”为核心,为用户带来更加优质的交易体验。

更多信息请访问:Website | Twitter | Telegram | Discord

Leituras Relacionadas

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHá 10m

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHá 10m

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 1h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 1h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 1h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHá 1h

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHá 1h

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片