一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2023-11-01Última atualização em 2023-11-01

Resumo

相对于其市值，Injective的交易量更高，这可能表明其吸引着更多的市场兴趣，交易更活跃。

原文作者：Axel Bitblaze（@Axel_bitblaze 69 ）

原文编译：Joyce，BlockBeats

编者按：加密研究员 Axel Bitblaze 从技术、用例、性能、共识机制、市场地位及代币经济学角度分析了 Injective、Oasis 和 Near 三条公链。并根据 Injective 的交易量 / 市值比率较高，认为短期内市场对 Injective 的兴趣更多，其上的交易也更为活跃。BlockBeats 编译如下：

专注于隐私的 L1 解决方案 Oasis Protocol

技术：专注于隐私保护功能；结合安全计算技术（如可信执行环境）以及区块链框架；

共识机制：采用权益证明（PoS）来达成共识；

用例：主要针对需要隐私的应用程序；尤其适用于需要保护敏感数据的医疗保健或金融领域；

性能：具有高可扩展性和低 gas 费；PoS 机制和优化的网络结构的优势；

市场定位：作为一个以隐私为中心的平台，可能会吸引一个利基市场；对处理敏感数据的行业尤其有吸引力。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

DeFi 和衍生品 L1 解决方案 Injective

技术：旨在为衍生品和无 DeFi 创建一个完全去中心化的平台；允许创建无需许可和去中心化的市场；

共识机制：使用 PoS 模型，有助于更快的交易速度和更低的费用；

用例：专注于交易和金融，支持期货、永续期货等一系列金融产品；

性能：高交易吞吐量和低延迟，解决了 DeFi 和交易中的一些常见痛点；

市场定位：对 DeFi 社区和寻找去中心化、安全高效交易平台的交易员具有强烈吸引力。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

Near protocol

技术：利用分片技术实现可扩展性，允许网络在增长时处理更多事务；

共识机制：采用 Nightshade，一种 PoS 的变体，有助于实现高吞吐量和低交易成本；

用例：旨在成为一个开发者友好的平台，支持各种 dApp，包括 NFT、游戏和 DeFi；

性能：采用了一种独特的分片方法（sharding-as-you-go），为区块链不可能三角问题提供了一个潜在的解决方案；

市场定位：专注于可用性和可扩展性，旨在瞄准区块链生态系统中从开发者到最终用户的更广泛细分市场。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

对比分析

1）侧重领域

- $ROSE 因其隐私功能而与众不同。

- $INJ 针对 DeFi 和交易市场。

- $NEAR 将自己定位为适用于各种 dApp 的通用、可扩展区块链。

2）技术优势

- $ROSE 隐私保护方法是一个关键的差异化因素，在关注数据敏感性的行业尤其相关。

- $INJ 为金融部门提供专业工具，特别是衍生品和交易。

- $NEAR 分片技术为可扩展性提供了坚实的基础，对许多 dApp 开发人员具有广泛的吸引力。

3）用例和生态系统

- $ROSE 可能会在需要数据隐私的行业中看到利基采用。

- $INJ 可以吸引金融机构和 DeFi 爱好者。

- $NEAR 由于其灵活性和可扩展性，有可能被更广泛地采用，吸引了多样化的 dApp 开发。

4）投资者视角

- $ROSE 对于那些希望投资加密货币隐私领域的人来说可能很有吸引力。

- $INJ 可能会吸引对区块链上金融应用的增长和创新感兴趣的投资者。

- $NEAR 对于押注区块链技术在各个领域广泛采用的投资者来说，这可能是一个合适的选择。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

代币经济学

1）市值

• $NEAR 1, 228, 940, 901 美元

• $ROSE ： 263, 770, 383 美元

• $INJ 1, 152, 649, 407 美元

分析：

与 ROSE 相比，NEAR 和 INJ 的市值明显更高。这表明市场估值更高，投资者的信心或效用感知可能更高。较高的市值通常意味着在市场上的地位更成熟，但也可能意味着更成熟，与小盘币相比，可能提供更低的增长率。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

2） 24 小时交易量及市值比率

- $NEAR ：

- 交易量： $ 22, 437, 661 

- 交易量/市值比率： 0.02 

- $ROSE ：

- 交易量： $ 6, 461, 412 

- 交易量/市值比率： 0.02 

- $INJ ：

- 交易量： $ 51, 954, 873 

- 成交量/市值比率： 0.05 

分析：

$INJ 相对于其市值，交易量明显更高，表明交易更活跃，短期内可能有更高的流动性和投资者兴趣。

$NEAR 和 $ROSE，虽然具有相似的比率，但相比之下不太活跃。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

供应指标：

1）流通供应量

- $NEAR ： 989, 205, 461 （占总供应量的 98.92% ）

- $ROSE ： 5, 029, 357, 184 （占总供应量的 50.29% ）

- $INJ ： 83, 755, 556 （占总供应量的 83.76% ）

2）总供应量和最大供应量

- $NEAR ： 10 亿总供应量，未定义最大供应量

- $ROSE ： 100 亿总供应量，未定义最大供应量

- $INJ ： 1 亿总供应量和最大供应量

$NEAR 其供应量几乎完全流通，表明通胀压力有限。

$ROSE 只有其总供应量的一半在流通，可能导致通货膨胀影响。

$INJ 供应有上限，如果需求保持强劲，则吸引价值升值。

一文对比Oasis、Injective和Near三条公链

代币经济学的结论

• $INJ 脱颖而出 - 相对于其市值，它的交易量更高，这可能表明市场兴趣或投机交易更活跃。

• 流通供应比例至关重要：

- $NEAR ：几乎完全稀释。

- $INJ ： 大部分的代币供应量已经达到了设定的最大供应上限，并可以在市场上自由交易。

- $ROSE ： 相当一部分尚未进入流通。

原文链接

Leituras Relacionadas

There’s An FOMC Meeting Scheduled This Month, But Will The Fed Decision Affect Bitcoin?

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is scheduled to meet on June 16-17, with markets widely expecting the Fed to maintain interest rates at their current level of 3.5-3.75%. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, there is a 99.4% probability of rates remaining unchanged. The outcome of this meeting is anticipated to impact Bitcoin's price. If rates are held steady, Bitcoin's current market trajectory is likely to continue unchanged. Conversely, an unexpected rate hike could trigger bearish sentiment by reducing investor risk appetite and market liquidity, potentially leading to sell-offs. A rate cut, though currently considered improbable, would be the most bullish scenario, encouraging investment in risk assets like Bitcoin and potentially driving its price higher.

bitcoinistHá 29m

There’s An FOMC Meeting Scheduled This Month, But Will The Fed Decision Affect Bitcoin?

bitcoinistHá 29m

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

Anthropic has confidentially filed for an IPO, led by Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, potentially going public by October. Following its latest $650 billion funding round, its pre-IPO valuation stands at $965 billion, with projections reaching up to $2 trillion at listing, which would make it the highest-valued private company ever. The article, written by Fu Sheng, addresses skepticism that this represents an AI bubble akin to the 2000 dot-com crash. It argues the current situation differs fundamentally. Unlike the internet bubble era, which relied on speculative narratives with little revenue, Anthropic's valuation is backed by unprecedented, measurable financial performance. Key data points include: * **Revenue Growth:** ARR skyrocketed from $10 billion in early 2025 to $470 billion by May 2026, targeting $100 billion by year-end—a growth curve unmatched in business history. * **Profitability:** It achieved operating profitability in Q2 2026 with an estimated $5.6 billion profit. * **Efficiency:** With ~3,000 employees and ~$470 billion ARR, its revenue per employee exceeds $10 million. Products like Claude Code, launched less than a year ago, already generate $25 billion in annualized revenue. * **Enterprise Adoption:** It boasts a strong enterprise client base, with 8 of the Fortune 10 and over 1,000 large firms spending over $1 million annually on Claude. The valuation is framed using a traditional SaaS model (e.g., a 10x Price-to-Sales multiple on $100 billion revenue). The author contends the core question for analysts has shifted from "How big could this be?" to "How much is it earning and will earn next quarter?" The discussion extends beyond Anthropic to a broader paradigm shift: the transition from a "carbon-based" to a "silicon-based" economy. Companies are increasingly prioritizing investment in compute and AI capabilities over human resources, as these directly scale productivity and competitive advantage. Anthropic's IPO is thus positioned not just as a corporate milestone, but as a price anchor for this new economic era.

链捕手Há 35m

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

链捕手Há 35m

US Senators Press Bank Regulators For ‘Fair’ Crypto Capital Rules

A group of U.S. Senate Republicans, led by Senator Cynthia Lummis, is urging federal bank regulators to establish clear and fair capital rules for banks involved with crypto assets. In a letter to the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC, the lawmakers criticized the international Basel Committee's standards, which impose a punitive 1,250% risk weight on crypto assets, calling it a de facto ban not based on actual risk. They applauded recent interagency guidance that granted tokenized securities the same capital treatment as traditional ones, arguing this risk-based principle should apply consistently to all digital assets. The senators called on the agencies to develop a new capital framework, aligning with recent legislative progress on crypto market structure. Their push coincides with testimonies from top regulators, who emphasized a shift toward more risk-based supervision and responsible innovation, while also addressing stablecoin oversight under new proposals.

bitcoinistHá 41m

US Senators Press Bank Regulators For ‘Fair’ Crypto Capital Rules

bitcoinistHá 41m

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHá 3h

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHá 3h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHá 3h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow