5 emerging Metaverse, NFT trends to watch out for in 2022

cryptoslatePublicado em 2022-04-22Última atualização em 2022-04-22

Resumo

The metaverse and NFTs have influenced the digital world as well as industries spanning from art to gaming to even investing.

The metaverse and NFTs have influenced the digital world as well as industries spanning from art to gaming to even investing. However, these industries have yet to attain their full potential.

Twitter, Meta, and Reddit are all working on NFT or Metaverse projects, investors are betting big on NFTs, and new companies are cropping up.

So, how do the metaverse and NFTs’ future look? What industry will they disrupt next? And what developments will define the next few years? Let’s look at five emerging trends within the metaverse and NFT spaces.

1. Augmented Reality

Augmented Reality (AR) will reduce entry barriers into the metaverse because AR-compatible devices are cheaper to acquire and use. Anyone can use their smartphone to access AR features. One example is Pokemon GO which had over 1.1 million cumulative app downloads in 2020.

Augmented reality is currently in its early stages, but it will mature in the future years. It is a novel method that will bring value to daily life. The worldwide augmented reality industry is estimated to expand in the following years, with a market valuation of up to $300 billion by 2024.

Several businesses are developing augmented reality (AR) solutions for their clients. Apple, for example, is working on an AR/VR headset. The manufacturing schedule was initially pushed back from 2020 to 2022; however, rumors say the tech giant has completed crucial production testing.

2. Metaverse Land

After the social media behemoth, Facebook changed its name to Meta and declared its plan to invest in the virtual reality field, interest in augmented reality, virtual reality, and metaverse real estate skyrocketed. 

Nonetheless, pieces of land in the virtual real estate market may seem unusual investments. The fact is that they are, in many respects, extremely comparable to real-world real estate. According to recent research by crypto asset management Grayscale, the digital world might soon become a $1 trillion enterprise.

Investors prefer metaverse-based real estate due to multiple reasons. For starters, virtual property, like physical property, is in short supply. Owning virtual real estate means you have a unique piece of land in a metaverse environment that you may use to create income-generating assets like leasable buildings or virtual spaces with sponsored events.

Second, each piece of metaverse real estate is unique and protected by a non-fungible token (NFT). An NFT is a deed or evidence of ownership for anything digital (or physical).

Your virtual real estate NFT ensures your ownership and enables you to sell the property to a different owner. It also records all transactions for that property, removing the need for title work. It is essentially a digital act from the 21st century.

3. Solana NFTs

NFTs function similarly to blockchain-backed receipts for digital assets like artwork, profile photographs, collectibles, and more. Last year, the NFT market produced around $25 billion in trade volume, with Ethereum and its sidechain and layer-2 scaling solutions well ahead of the competition.

However, the Solana NFT ecosystem has been growing in popularity over the past year and with total sales volume reaching over $1 billion. This increased activity attracted attention from leading Ethereum-based NFT platforms.

OpenSea, the most popular NFT marketplace, added support for collections from the second-largest NFT ecosystem outside of Ethereum with the inclusion of Solana. The integration is currently in beta according to the NFT marketplace.

Although OpenSea claims to support 165 collections, a search of the marketplace by chain reveals that more than 1,175,371 Solana NFTs are listed on the platform. Rarible also decided to add Solana support to their platform following this announcement.

solana search by chain on Opensea

1,175,371 Solana NFTs currently listed on OpenSea

NFT marketplaces that dominate the Solana NFT space include Solanart and DigitalEyes, while projects like SolSea and Magic Eden are relative newcomers.

Magic Eden has had a total sales volume of $41 million in the past month. While this is a small fraction of the $2.5 billion traded on OpenSea last month, Magic Eden had over 95,000 active users in that time. 

4. Metaverse Events

Increased accessibility is a significant driver of metaverse occurrences. To begin with, contrary to popular belief, anyone can participate in a virtual reality event. Modern web browsers are powerful, and with the right web platform, the metaverse is accessible with a simple click of a link on any mobile or laptop device. 

This kind of accessibility contributes to the democratization of the online environment by guaranteeing that no member of society is unable to access and embrace an online ecosystem owing to technological limitations.

Also, there are no attendance constraints in a virtual environment. Event organizers are not constrained by venue capacity or design, allowing for infinite scalability. 

Metaverse venues are customizable to meet the specific demands of an individual event or conference, with access to things like breakout rooms and smaller areas if many lectures or presentations need to take place simultaneously. Unlimited capacity might also imply unrestricted monetization.

One example is MultiNFT, a metaverse platform that holds metaverse-based clubbing events through virtual nightclubs on VR platforms like Decentraland and Somnium Space.

5. Play-to-Earn Gaming

Play-to-earn games have upended the traditional gaming business by enabling players to earn NFTs by achieving predetermined tasks while playing games.

According to Blockchain Gaming Alliance statistics, 1.4 million Unique Active Wallets (UAW) were interacting daily with game dapps (decentralized apps), accounting for 49% of the industry’s total usage in 2021.

The play-to-earn concept has changed the gaming business by enabling gamers to trade and exchange assets between platforms. In-game assets had no real-world worth before the introduction of play-to-earn games because the creators owned and controlled all of the assets in the game. 

Players would pay top cash for a game’s most valuable assets, like weapons and skins, but they could only utilize them in-game. They couldn’t move them or exchange them for other assets. When the developer changes the game’s structure, and the assets become outdated, the players lose their investment and must obtain new assets to continue playing the game. 

Traditional games were simply for pleasure and excitement in this manner. The inclusion of blockchain and cryptocurrencies resulted in NFTs, which in turn resulted in GameFi.

GameFi has enabled players to increase the value of their assets and earn money while playing their favorite games.

Conclusion

The metaverse and NFTs are two reasonably new yet impactful sectors in the crypto space. As the market matures, we will likely see more technologies, integrations, and products emerge within these industries.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight NewsHá 10m

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight NewsHá 10m

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight NewsHá 28m

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight NewsHá 28m

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbitHá 39m

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbitHá 39m

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片