[dragon and tiger list] the risk of BTC's high leverage ratio falling sharply increased

Huobi ResearchPublicado em 2022-04-18Última atualização em 2022-04-19

Resumo

With the BTC price moving downward, the possibility of further falling below the support line in the near future is very high.

1. Market trend: the leverage ratio of BTC increases, and the risk of price decline increases

With the BTC price moving downward, the possibility of further falling below the support line in the near future is very high. Judging only from the trading volume and price performance, BTC does not support a new round of rebound. Compared with the trading volume in June 2021, the current weekly trading volume of BTC is sluggish, which may be the reason why it is difficult for BTC to rebound in the short term after breaking the position. At the beginning of July 2021, the weekly trading volume of BTC was relatively mild, especially more than twice the trading volume of BTC at the same point. Of course, not only the trading volume is shrinking, but also the number of active addresses on the BTC chain is running at a low level. Therefore, we can pay more attention to the long-term low absorption opportunities after withdrawal rather than short-term profit opportunities.

Among the important data changes of estimated leverage ratio, it can be seen that the index has reached the position of 0.254 on April 17, the highest value in two years. If BTC bulls fail to raise the price in the near future, under the premise of such a high leverage ratio, the downward movement of the price is bound to fall below the contract cost price of more investors and expand the scale of position explosion. Accordingly, the increase in the scale of position explosion will also quickly push the price down.

2. Interpretation of panic index:

The recent performance of the panic index is weak. It has been lower than 50 since April 5, which indicates that investors' trading enthusiasm is not high. Compared with the performance of the panic index in the second half of 2021, the current panic index is more panic, so it can not be radical in the trading direction.

In the calculation of the panic index, the trading volume, volatility and bitcoin market value have 25%, 25% and 10% weights respectively. The current trading volume maintains a long-term contraction trend, limiting the rebound of the panic index. And the short-term BTC decline continues to expand, and the volatility is not high. In the position where the panic index is lower than 30, any change in price is worth the vigilance of bulls.

3. Dragon and tiger list:

BTC led the continuation of the correction trend of mainstream currencies, and most sectors showed downward performance. In the increase list, the top currencies are STX, xcn and FXS. Among the falling rankings, waves, fil and ZIL have a large 24-hour decline of more than 10%.

Considering the continuation of the adjustment trend of mainstream currencies such as BTC and eth, the overall market is still dominated by callback. Most of the top gainers are the concept of stable currency. It is difficult to rebound in the near future. Pay more attention to the confirmation of the bottom, and then the low suction market.

STX

Stacks is a new Internet with decentralized applications, equipped with a complete set of open source development tools to build and guide the decentralized application and protocol ecosystem. Users have their own data, and the browser is everything they need to start. Stacks is the "Google" of the blockchain, in which the architecture is divided into three layers: the bottom layer of the blockchain - peer-to-peer network - data layer. The business model of stacks is very clear. Its goal is to become a blockchain browser. On this browser, users can create basic todo applications and build single page JavaScript applications.

In terms of price, STX rebounded during the period of high-volume short-term pulse, with a short-term 24-hour increase of 7.4%, and the trading volume increased by more than 7 times. While the short-term main force pulls the market, there is great uncertainty in the price performance. To catch up, you can choose to trade at a low suction point.

XCN

Chain is a cloud blockchain infrastructure that enables organizations to build better financial services from scratch. Chain launched chain core, a licensed and open source blockchain and sequence, whose ledger is a service product.

As a new currency listed on the fire currency exchange, xcn's short-term performance is still strong, and the price fluctuation intensity within the day has reached 4%. Xcn trading volume will remain relatively stable due to the shock.

FXS

FraX aims to become "the world's first decentralized stable coin, with some of its supply tokens supported by collateral and some stabilized by algorithms."

FraX protocol implements a dual token system: stable token FraX and protocol governance token FXS.

In the fourth quarter of 2021, with the release of FraX V2, FraX was adopted on a large scale and linked with the whole defi system. As of January 25, the FraX project fund pool earned an average of $500000 per day (annualized about $180 million) through the amo (algorithmic market making program) launched by the team in the early fourth quarter of 2021. During the same period, the supply of FraX climbed from less than $500 million to a staggering $2.6 billion.

In terms of price, FXS retreated after the platform token Luna, which followed Terra algorithm to stabilize the currency, rebounded in the early stage, and the price is in the adjustment stage recently. Despite the 24-hour rise of 1.9%, FXS has not effectively left the adjustment area. In terms of lock up, FXS locked up $2.3 billion, with little change. Next, we can focus on the supporting effect of BTC stabilization on FXS. FXS is expected to have a strong price again after the overall market stabilizes.

Decline list

Among the decline list, waves and ZIL led the decline, with a 24-hour decline of 10.8% and 10.5%.

Wave has a large decline and expanded the decline space under the condition of large volume, indicating that the main force has typical shipping signs.

After ZIL released meta universe platform Metapolis, the price continued to rise strongly. It is reported that on April 2, ZIL will hold an event in Miami for the purpose of the Metapolis platform. Perhaps, the development of ZIL market is related to the good expectations of investors for its participation in metauniverse.

In terms of price performance, ZIL also rose and fell, but the decline in volume is more typical. In other words, ZIL may usher in a technical rebound after adjustment and expansion. Especially with the positive blessing, ZIL's massive rise since March 26 can not be ignored. This was the strongest bull rally ever.

Leituras Relacionadas

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbitHá 17m

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbitHá 17m

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbitHá 21m

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbitHá 21m

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbitHá 22m

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbitHá 22m

Trading

Spot
活动图片