长推:RWA的下一波叙事又开始升温

MarsBitPublicado em 2023-07-19Última atualização em 2023-07-19

Resumo

只有少数玩家会成为赢家。

注:本文来自@TheDeFISaint 推特,其是加密KOL,原推文内容由MarsBit整理如下:
RWA的下一波叙事又开始升温。
只有少数玩家会成为赢家。
其中的底层技术被设置为连接不同的 RWA 协议。
为了早点抓住这个机会,让我们深入了解一下:

RWA


Coinbase的报告称,代币化资产可能是DeFi增长的催化剂。
现实世界资产(RWA) 是可以代币化并在区块链上表示为数字代币的实物资产。
由于区块链易于访问,因此将其上的资产代币化使其非常高效
由于代币化,对现实世界收益资产的投资起价低至50美元,消除了高障碍,让每个人都能通过可持续的商业模式获得利润。
随着web3行业的迅速发展,代币化的RWA已经达到169亿美元,到2030年将达到16万亿美元。
根据DeFILlama的数据, RWA TVL现在排名第12位,之前排名第22位

RWA


标准普尔500强公司是代币化的早期采用者:谷歌、万事达、Visa、Fiserv, Inc.、Micro Focus、美国运通公司等等。

RWA


据Blockworks报道,贝莱德首席执行官拉里·芬克(Larry Fink)表示,“现实世界资产的代币化是一个有吸引力的用例,因为它指出了提高资本市场效率、缩短价值链、改善投资者成本和准入的机会。”
万事达和谷歌推出了代币化,为Google Pay用户提供安全的万事达卡支付。
此外,有传言称亚马逊的新NFT与RWA相关
不仅如此,西门子还在Polygon上发行了6000万欧元的债券
新加坡金融管理局(Monetary Authority of Singapore)也在通过Project Guardian测试资产代币化。
高盛也推出了GS Dap来对传统资产进行代币化。
这么多有趣的观点都是关于RWA的
RWA接管加密货币只是时间问题,因为Circle的首席执行官同样相信RWA的未来

RWA


https://twitter.com/jerallaire/status/1641103383229595658
谈到代币化的RWA,一切都足够透明和清晰,没人会去争论。
公司的股份在链上移动。即使在熊市中,一些公司也承认,代币化会给他们带来比任何其他推动者更多的好处。

RWA


RWA 附带许多好处,比如你的资产可以获得固定收益,这对于那些希望尽量减少市场波动风险的用户来说是很有用的。
900万亿美元将被代币化,任何资产都可以被代币化,并且很有可能,想象一下,所有资产都是被分散的,并且是完全上链的。我们将拥有多么好的经济啊!股票、房地产、债券、艺术品等等

RWA


RWA是大规模采用DeFi的门户,随着企业转向线上,商务变得更快、更高效。同样,随着资产所有权转移到区块链上,新的市场将被创造出来,围绕它们的商业将变得更加高效。

RWA


RWA将为下一批百万用户提供DeFi,尽早从这种叙事中获益的最好方法是利用构建RWA未来的协议。

Leituras Relacionadas

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbitHá 18m

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbitHá 18m

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbitHá 33m

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbitHá 33m

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbitHá 1h

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbitHá 1h

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbitHá 1h

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片