Bitcoin climbs above crucial $40,000 mark as Fed ponders interest rate hike

FinboldPublicado em 2022-04-12Última atualização em 2022-04-12

Resumo

Despite losing territory for seven of the previous eight days, Bitcoin (BTC) climbed back over $40,000 on Tuesday, April 12, regaining some ground after recently falling below that mark.

Bitcoin climbs above crucial $40,000 mark as Fed ponders interest rate hike

Despite losing territory for seven of the previous eight days, Bitcoin (BTC) climbed back over $40,000 on Tuesday, April 12, regaining some ground after recently falling below that mark.
Due to historically high inflation and ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, Bitcoin and the larger cryptocurrency market have suffered in recent weeks, as the Federal Reserve started raising interest rates in response.
Economists polled ahead of the release of statistics on Tuesday expect that inflation in the United States will have increased to 8.4% in March, the strongest rate since early 1982. 
According to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Chief Economist Jan Hatzius, the Federal Reserve may be forced to hike interest rates “significantly” higher than it currently forecasts in order to calm an unsustainable U.S. economy.
Bitcoin price analysis
Related
Share of ADA supply held by Cardano whales hits 2-year high Number of active addresses on Ethereum decreases by nearly 10% in just a week Crypto industry on ‘unstoppable trajectory’ into global economic mainstream, says commodity expert
Currently, Bitcoin is trading at $40,266, down 4.77% on the day and 13.66% in the last week after seeing a steady climb up until the Bitcoin 2022 conference in Miami, according to CoinMarketCap.

Bitcoin 1-day price. Source: CoinMarketCap Interesting, prominent crypto trading analyst Michaël van de Poppe pinpointed the $40,000 mark as an important level for BTC “while equities are also still dropping. Let’s see. I’d like to see a reaction here. Other crucial levels if lost; $38K Sub $33K.”

Bitcoin chart levels. Source: Van de Poppe Equities correlated to yields
Notably Lead Insights Analyst Will Clemente noted the fixed-income market is selling off aggressively, with the 10-year yield breaking out of a multi-decade long downtrend.
“Equities are generally inversely correlated to yields because of DCF models. The higher the 10Y yields, the lower equity valuations go.”

10y yield. Source: Will Clemente
Clemente highlighted this is putting pressure on equities, especially the Nasdaq. Tech stocks as Finbold reported are ‘feeling the heat’ as US 10-year yields rise to the highest level since 2019
According to the analyst: 
“This roll over in tech is effecting BTC as well. Whether I agree or not, the market appears to be viewing BTC as a high beta play on tech, trading at an increasing correlation over the last month.”

Bitcoin vs US Dollar. Source: Will Clemente In his opinion personal view, he sees closing above $47,000 as momentum and still sees the low $30,000 as value.

Leituras Relacionadas

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight NewsHá 11m

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight NewsHá 11m

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbitHá 21m

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbitHá 21m

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片