Bitcoin Shorts Squeezed As Price Shows Recovery

BitcoinistPublicado em 2023-06-08Última atualização em 2023-06-08

Resumo

Data shows the Bitcoin shorts that had amassed after the recent crash have now been squeezed following the recovery in...

Data shows the Bitcoin shorts that had amassed after the recent crash have now been squeezed following the recovery in the asset’s price.
Bitcoin Shorts Take Beating As Price Shows Sharp Rebound
According to data from the on-chain analytics firm Santiment, the funding rate on Binance had become deeply negative after the crash. The “funding rate” here refers to the number of periodic fees that the perpetual contract traders are exchanging with each other.
When the value of this metric is positive, it means that the long traders are paying a premium to the short investors in order to hold onto their positions right now. Such a trend implies that bullish sentiment is held by the majority currently.
On the other hand, negative values of the indicator suggest that a bearish sentiment is more dominant in the market at the moment, as the shorts are paying a fee to the longs.
Now, here is a chart that shows the trend in the Bitcoin perpetual contract funding rate on the cryptocurrency exchange Binance over the past month or so:

Bitcoin Funding Rates


The value of the metric seems to have taken a plunge in recent days | Source: Santiment on Twitter
As displayed in the above graph, the perpetual contract funding rate for Bitcoin on Binance had been at positive values during most of the past month, meaning that bullish sentiment was being held by the majority of the investors.

Following the crash caused by the news of SEC suing Binance, though, the indicator’s value very quickly plunged down and hit some deep red values. During this price plunge, a huge amount of long contracts were liquidated.
Events, where such a mass amount of liquidation occurs, are called “squeezes.” Naturally, the leverage flush during the crash was an example of a “long squeeze,” as the extreme majority of the contracts involved in it were longs.
With the bullish sentiment being cleared out in the recent long squeeze, the funding rate took a plunge. It would appear that the traders then became eager to start betting on the price decline to extend further, leading to the indicator’s value becoming very negative.
At their peak, these red funding rates had hit the highest value since 10 March 2023. Back then in March, the metric had assumed sharp negative values after the asset’s value had observed a plummet below the $20,000 level.
Related Reading: Polygon Continues To Struggle As MATIC Exchange Supply Spikes
After the funding rates had become deep red, though, a short squeeze took place in the market as the price sharply recovered. Something similar has also looked to have taken place this time as well, as Bitcoin has once again sharply recovered.
The perpetual contract funding rates on Binance have also naturally become positive again, suggesting that the investors who had prematurely shorted the asset have suffered liquidation.
At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around $26,800, down 1% in the last week.

Bitcoin Price Chart


BTC has surged during the past day or so | Source: BTCUSD on TradingView

Leituras Relacionadas

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

Gold is experiencing its strongest rally since 1979, with prices reaching a record high near $5,600 per ounce in January. This surge is driven primarily by central banks, not retail investors. In 2025, central banks net purchased 863 tonnes of gold, with a similar increase expected in 2026. Traditional gold investment methods—physical bullion and ETFs—present trade-offs like storage issues, limited access, or management fees. Tokenized gold emerges as a third option: digital tokens representing ownership of physical bars stored in professional vaults. These tokens are globally transferable in seconds, divisible, and redeemable for physical metal. The potential impact mirrors that of dollar stablecoins. Stablecoins digitized the dollar, enabling cheap, instant, global transfers and driving adoption from $27 billion in 2020 to over $3 trillion today. Similarly, tokenized gold solves gold's "form problem"—its lack of divisibility, portability, and accessibility. Adoption is accelerating. In Q1 2026, tokenized gold trading volume hit $90.7 billion, surpassing the $84.6 billion for all of 2025. Its market cap exceeded $6 billion, growing 5.5 times faster than physical gold holdings in the quarter. While concerns about counterparty risk exist, tokenized gold represents a direct claim on allocated bars, with major issuers providing regular attestation reports. Just as stablecoins placed dollars on a digital, global rail, tokenized gold now offers a more practical form for this ancient asset, potentially expanding access to billions.

marsbitHá 12m

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

marsbitHá 12m

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

Japanese borrowing costs have hit their highest levels since 1996, with yields on 30-year bonds reaching 4.185%. This marks a significant shift for a country long reliant on negative rates. Concurrently, Bitcoin surged 22% past $80,000, seemingly decoupled from the bond market turmoil. Historically, the massive yen carry trade has fueled global risk assets, predicated on near-zero Japanese rates. This assumption is now challenged. A potential rate hike by the Bank of Japan in September could strengthen the yen, forcing carry trade unwinds and potentially triggering a global deleveraging event, as seen in August 2024 when Bitcoin fell sharply. Conversely, if the yen weakens further, Bitcoin could attract Japanese investors as a hedge against currency depreciation and the country's massive debt burden. Institutional adoption in Japan is growing, with regulatory changes paving the way for potential crypto ETFs by 2027. The key variable is the BoJ's September policy signal. If it hints at a rapid tightening cycle to combat inflation and support the yen, risk assets like Bitcoin may face selling pressure from carry trade liquidation. However, if debt sustainability concerns limit its hawkishness, leading to a weaker yen, Bitcoin could benefit. Currently, the market is betting on a slow-motion debt crisis, not a sudden collapse. While Bitcoin shows resilience, its fate remains tied to the direction of the yen and the scale of any carry trade unwind.

marsbitHá 15m

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

marsbitHá 15m

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

"Bitcoin's Quantum Defense: A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes" by the Blockstream Research Team explores how Bitcoin can transition to quantum-resistant digital signatures, as current schemes like Schnorr and ECDSA are vulnerable to quantum computers. The report evaluates three lattice-based signature candidates—Dilithium, Falcon, and Hawk—against criteria like on-chain cost (key/signature size), implementation complexity, deployment risks, and support for Bitcoin's key derivation standard (BIP-32). The analysis recommends a minimum Security Level 3 for Bitcoin due to its long-term security needs. Dilithium (ML-DSA) is praised for its simplicity and integer-only operations, making it easier to implement securely, but it has the largest signature size (~5.3 KB for Level 3). Falcon (FN-DSA) offers the most compact signatures (e.g., ~3.1 KB for Level 5) and the fastest verification, though its signing requires complex floating-point sampling—a solvable engineering challenge. Hawk, despite its small size, was withdrawn from NIST standardization after a security vulnerability was discovered, highlighting the importance of conservative security margins. Currently, neither Dilithium nor Falcon has a fully viable, production-ready BIP-32 key derivation method. The report concludes that if a lattice-based scheme had to be chosen now, Falcon-1024 would be the preferred option for its balance of size, speed, and mature security assumptions. However, the short-term recommendation remains hash-based signatures (like SPHINCS+) for their lower risk, with a potential future hybrid or full transition to Falcon once its standard (FN-DSA) is finalized and well-supported.

marsbitHá 17m

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

marsbitHá 17m

Trading

Spot
活动图片