Breaking: CFTC Chair Reiterates "ETH Is Commodity" Stance Amid SEC Lawsuits

CoingapePublicado em 2023-06-07Última atualização em 2023-06-07

Resumo

Speaking in a US House Committee hearing on “The Future of Digital Assets: Providing Clarity for Digital Asset Spot Markets,” Behnam reiterated his stance on Ethereum being a commodity.


Crypto Market News: US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Rostin Behnam on Tuesday reiterated his stance that Ethereum is a commodity and not security. This comes at a time when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed back to back complaints against two of the world’s top crypto exchanges, Binance and Coinbase over violation of financial regulations. The SEC had been emphasizing that crypto businesses operating in the United States come forward and register digital asset trade related operations with it. However, there is no clarity as to which laws would the crypto assets fit under.


Gary Gensler, the SEC Chair had recently stirred a controversy in the crypto market by saying that everything other than Bitcoin is a security. He maintains that Bitcoin is not a security but a commodity under the CFTC’s jurisdiction. On the contrary, CFTC Chair Behnam had been saying that Ethereum qualifies as a commodity. This confusion and uncertainty, as things stand, is still not resolved although efforts are on with a draft bill to categorize which assets are securities and commodities.
“Ethereum Is A Commodity”

Speaking in a US House Committee hearing on “The Future of Digital Assets: Providing Clarity for Digital Asset Spot Markets,” Behnam reiterated his stance on Ethereum being a commodity. The question arose when Congressman Austin Scott said crypto assets were clearly not securities and that the assets should be regulated by the CFTC and not the SEC. The CFTC Chair replied,
“I’ve argued in the past that Ether is a commodity.”






Leituras Relacionadas

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

Gold is experiencing its strongest rally since 1979, with prices reaching a record high near $5,600 per ounce in January. This surge is driven primarily by central banks, not retail investors. In 2025, central banks net purchased 863 tonnes of gold, with a similar increase expected in 2026. Traditional gold investment methods—physical bullion and ETFs—present trade-offs like storage issues, limited access, or management fees. Tokenized gold emerges as a third option: digital tokens representing ownership of physical bars stored in professional vaults. These tokens are globally transferable in seconds, divisible, and redeemable for physical metal. The potential impact mirrors that of dollar stablecoins. Stablecoins digitized the dollar, enabling cheap, instant, global transfers and driving adoption from $27 billion in 2020 to over $3 trillion today. Similarly, tokenized gold solves gold's "form problem"—its lack of divisibility, portability, and accessibility. Adoption is accelerating. In Q1 2026, tokenized gold trading volume hit $90.7 billion, surpassing the $84.6 billion for all of 2025. Its market cap exceeded $6 billion, growing 5.5 times faster than physical gold holdings in the quarter. While concerns about counterparty risk exist, tokenized gold represents a direct claim on allocated bars, with major issuers providing regular attestation reports. Just as stablecoins placed dollars on a digital, global rail, tokenized gold now offers a more practical form for this ancient asset, potentially expanding access to billions.

marsbitHá 16m

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

marsbitHá 16m

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

Japanese borrowing costs have hit their highest levels since 1996, with yields on 30-year bonds reaching 4.185%. This marks a significant shift for a country long reliant on negative rates. Concurrently, Bitcoin surged 22% past $80,000, seemingly decoupled from the bond market turmoil. Historically, the massive yen carry trade has fueled global risk assets, predicated on near-zero Japanese rates. This assumption is now challenged. A potential rate hike by the Bank of Japan in September could strengthen the yen, forcing carry trade unwinds and potentially triggering a global deleveraging event, as seen in August 2024 when Bitcoin fell sharply. Conversely, if the yen weakens further, Bitcoin could attract Japanese investors as a hedge against currency depreciation and the country's massive debt burden. Institutional adoption in Japan is growing, with regulatory changes paving the way for potential crypto ETFs by 2027. The key variable is the BoJ's September policy signal. If it hints at a rapid tightening cycle to combat inflation and support the yen, risk assets like Bitcoin may face selling pressure from carry trade liquidation. However, if debt sustainability concerns limit its hawkishness, leading to a weaker yen, Bitcoin could benefit. Currently, the market is betting on a slow-motion debt crisis, not a sudden collapse. While Bitcoin shows resilience, its fate remains tied to the direction of the yen and the scale of any carry trade unwind.

marsbitHá 19m

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

marsbitHá 19m

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

"Bitcoin's Quantum Defense: A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes" by the Blockstream Research Team explores how Bitcoin can transition to quantum-resistant digital signatures, as current schemes like Schnorr and ECDSA are vulnerable to quantum computers. The report evaluates three lattice-based signature candidates—Dilithium, Falcon, and Hawk—against criteria like on-chain cost (key/signature size), implementation complexity, deployment risks, and support for Bitcoin's key derivation standard (BIP-32). The analysis recommends a minimum Security Level 3 for Bitcoin due to its long-term security needs. Dilithium (ML-DSA) is praised for its simplicity and integer-only operations, making it easier to implement securely, but it has the largest signature size (~5.3 KB for Level 3). Falcon (FN-DSA) offers the most compact signatures (e.g., ~3.1 KB for Level 5) and the fastest verification, though its signing requires complex floating-point sampling—a solvable engineering challenge. Hawk, despite its small size, was withdrawn from NIST standardization after a security vulnerability was discovered, highlighting the importance of conservative security margins. Currently, neither Dilithium nor Falcon has a fully viable, production-ready BIP-32 key derivation method. The report concludes that if a lattice-based scheme had to be chosen now, Falcon-1024 would be the preferred option for its balance of size, speed, and mature security assumptions. However, the short-term recommendation remains hash-based signatures (like SPHINCS+) for their lower risk, with a potential future hybrid or full transition to Falcon once its standard (FN-DSA) is finalized and well-supported.

marsbitHá 21m

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

marsbitHá 21m

Trading

Spot
活动图片