Maybe Bitcoin didn’t bottom? SEC lawsuit against Binance shakes BTC bulls’ confidence

CointelegraphPublicado em 2023-06-06Última atualização em 2023-06-06

Resumo

Bitcoin’s price declined 5% in one hour on June 5 after the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Binance on allegations of violating federal securities laws. Even though the $25,500 support held for Bitcoin, investors are still digesting the potential impacts of the regulatory action, which also involves Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao.
According to digital asset investment firm Arca CEO Jeff Dorman, the direct impact of an eventual shutdown of Binance operations in the U.S. is irrelevant. Furthermore, non-criminal charges from the past should not destabilize Binance’s present international structures. Still, Arca’s CEO expects negative market sentiment to prevail as the crypto community cheers for CZ and Binance.
My 2 sats on SEC vs Binance

Mostly irrelevant since no one operates in the US anymore and a bunch of non-criminal charges for past wrongdoings don’t really matter.

I see 2 actual negatives from this: ⬇️
— Jeff Dorman, CFA (@jdorman81) June 5, 2023
Binance is not the only pressing concern
Even if the SEC charges against Binance have little to no impact in the medium term, there’s additional uncertainty coming from Digital Currency Group (DCG) and its subsidiary Genesis Capital, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Jan. 19.
looks like a dcg portco
-manages ~3b of silbert's personal holdings
-lent genesis 1b
-pulled 1b coincident w/ 3ac default / dcg note
-has ~ no clients other than barry

its v clear nobody else reads these filings carefully

the stonewalling makes sense!https://t.co/7NgFnUkmp1
— Data Finnovation (@DataFinnovation) June 4, 2023
According to Jon Reiter, CEO of Data Finnovation and ChainArgos, DCG CEO Barry Silbert pulled $1 billion out of his personal holdings just as cryptocurrency hedge fund Three Arrows Capital defaulted. While this could have been a coincidence, it certainly draws even more attention to the intercompany loans and deals inside DCG.
Traders now question whether Bitcoin (BTC) will test the $25,000 resistance, a level unseen since March 17. Considering that the U.S. debt ceiling crisis has been averted, the odds for a surprise Bitcoin price rally seem even more unlikely in the short term.
Investors should be especially attentive if Bitcoin futures contract premiums flip negative or if increased costs for hedging using BTC options occur.
Bitcoin derivatives markets show a mixed reaction
Bitcoin quarterly futures are popular among whales and arbitrage desks. However, these fixed-month contracts typically trade at a slight premium to spot markets, indicating that sellers are asking for more money to delay settlement.
As a result, BTC futures contracts in healthy markets should trade at a 5 to 10% annualized premium — a situation known as contango, which is not unique to crypto markets.

Bitcoin 2-month futures annualized premium. Source: LaevitasBitcoin traders have been rather cautious since June 1, as the futures premium remained below 4%. On the other hand, the indicator stood at 3.5% after the SEC charges against Binance came to light on June 5.
Traders should also analyze options markets to understand whether the recent correction has caused investors to become more optimistic. The 25% delta skew is a telling sign of when arbitrage desks and market makers overcharge for upside or downside protection.
In short, if traders anticipate a Bitcoin price drop, the skew metric will rise above 7%, and phases of excitement tend to have a negative 7% skew.

Bitcoin 30-day options 25% delta skew. Source: LaevitasAs displayed above, according to the BTC options 25% delta skew, traders suddenly flipped bearish, as the indicator spiked to 11% on June 5. This level was the highest in three months and signals discomfort from professional traders.
The bear trend continues while FUD prevails
In essence, Bitcoin options and futures markets suggest that the bear trend that started after the failed $31,000 test on April 14 continues, although there has been no significant fallout in the overall market structure. Yet, it might be too early to interpret the potential consequences of the SEC’s actions, and court rulings take months — if not years — to settle.
Consequently, those betting on a Bitcoin bull run should adjust their expectations because investors hate uncertainty.
Until there is more clarity on the DCG-Genesis situation and Binance’s operational capability amid the tougher U.S. regulatory environment, there is less incentive for long-term buyers to step in and defend the all-important $25,000 support.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.
This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Leituras Relacionadas

Grayscale’s Zach Pandl Says Rising U.S. Debt Could Boost BTC, ETH and ZEC

Grayscale Research's Zach Pandl connects rising U.S. national debt, now exceeding $40 trillion, to potential benefits for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Zcash. He explains that recent Treasury bond repurchases address symptoms but not the underlying structural budget deficits. With both government and private sector borrowing increasing, Pandl suggests that growing debt could erode trust in conventional fiat currencies. This environment, termed the "debasement trade," may boost demand for alternative stores of value, including specific cryptocurrencies seen as providing monetary exposure outside the traditional system.

TheNewsCryptoHá 11m

Grayscale’s Zach Pandl Says Rising U.S. Debt Could Boost BTC, ETH and ZEC

TheNewsCryptoHá 11m

The CTO of Thinking Machines Who Was Fired, Has Now Left OpenAI and Returned to Google

Barret Zoph, formerly CTO of Thinking Machines and an OpenAI VP, has rejoined Google DeepMind as Vice President of Research, focusing on reinforcement learning and post-training. His career, spanning eight years since his 2016 graduation, includes foundational work on neural architecture search and ChatGPT's post-training at OpenAI. The move follows a turbulent 20-month period where Zoph co-founded Thinking Machines, was abruptly fired amidst conflicting reports of misconduct or planned departure, briefly returned to lead OpenAI's enterprise business, and left again five months later. Zoph's return to Google DeepMind occurs during a significant talent exodus and leadership reshuffle at the company, which recently saw CEO Demis Hassabis step aside and key researchers depart for competitors. His hiring under new operational head Koray Kavukcuoglu is seen as a strategic addition to bolster Gemini's development roadmap. This series of rapid moves underscores the fluidity of top AI talent, where key researchers and even founders transition between major labs with little regard for traditional corporate loyalty, driven by the high demand for their experience in large-scale experimentation and team-building.

marsbitHá 16m

The CTO of Thinking Machines Who Was Fired, Has Now Left OpenAI and Returned to Google

marsbitHá 16m

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

Gold is experiencing its strongest rally since 1979, with prices reaching a record high near $5,600 per ounce in January. This surge is driven primarily by central banks, not retail investors. In 2025, central banks net purchased 863 tonnes of gold, with a similar increase expected in 2026. Traditional gold investment methods—physical bullion and ETFs—present trade-offs like storage issues, limited access, or management fees. Tokenized gold emerges as a third option: digital tokens representing ownership of physical bars stored in professional vaults. These tokens are globally transferable in seconds, divisible, and redeemable for physical metal. The potential impact mirrors that of dollar stablecoins. Stablecoins digitized the dollar, enabling cheap, instant, global transfers and driving adoption from $27 billion in 2020 to over $3 trillion today. Similarly, tokenized gold solves gold's "form problem"—its lack of divisibility, portability, and accessibility. Adoption is accelerating. In Q1 2026, tokenized gold trading volume hit $90.7 billion, surpassing the $84.6 billion for all of 2025. Its market cap exceeded $6 billion, growing 5.5 times faster than physical gold holdings in the quarter. While concerns about counterparty risk exist, tokenized gold represents a direct claim on allocated bars, with major issuers providing regular attestation reports. Just as stablecoins placed dollars on a digital, global rail, tokenized gold now offers a more practical form for this ancient asset, potentially expanding access to billions.

marsbitHá 17m

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

marsbitHá 17m

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

Japanese borrowing costs have hit their highest levels since 1996, with yields on 30-year bonds reaching 4.185%. This marks a significant shift for a country long reliant on negative rates. Concurrently, Bitcoin surged 22% past $80,000, seemingly decoupled from the bond market turmoil. Historically, the massive yen carry trade has fueled global risk assets, predicated on near-zero Japanese rates. This assumption is now challenged. A potential rate hike by the Bank of Japan in September could strengthen the yen, forcing carry trade unwinds and potentially triggering a global deleveraging event, as seen in August 2024 when Bitcoin fell sharply. Conversely, if the yen weakens further, Bitcoin could attract Japanese investors as a hedge against currency depreciation and the country's massive debt burden. Institutional adoption in Japan is growing, with regulatory changes paving the way for potential crypto ETFs by 2027. The key variable is the BoJ's September policy signal. If it hints at a rapid tightening cycle to combat inflation and support the yen, risk assets like Bitcoin may face selling pressure from carry trade liquidation. However, if debt sustainability concerns limit its hawkishness, leading to a weaker yen, Bitcoin could benefit. Currently, the market is betting on a slow-motion debt crisis, not a sudden collapse. While Bitcoin shows resilience, its fate remains tied to the direction of the yen and the scale of any carry trade unwind.

marsbitHá 19m

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

marsbitHá 19m

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

"Bitcoin's Quantum Defense: A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes" by the Blockstream Research Team explores how Bitcoin can transition to quantum-resistant digital signatures, as current schemes like Schnorr and ECDSA are vulnerable to quantum computers. The report evaluates three lattice-based signature candidates—Dilithium, Falcon, and Hawk—against criteria like on-chain cost (key/signature size), implementation complexity, deployment risks, and support for Bitcoin's key derivation standard (BIP-32). The analysis recommends a minimum Security Level 3 for Bitcoin due to its long-term security needs. Dilithium (ML-DSA) is praised for its simplicity and integer-only operations, making it easier to implement securely, but it has the largest signature size (~5.3 KB for Level 3). Falcon (FN-DSA) offers the most compact signatures (e.g., ~3.1 KB for Level 5) and the fastest verification, though its signing requires complex floating-point sampling—a solvable engineering challenge. Hawk, despite its small size, was withdrawn from NIST standardization after a security vulnerability was discovered, highlighting the importance of conservative security margins. Currently, neither Dilithium nor Falcon has a fully viable, production-ready BIP-32 key derivation method. The report concludes that if a lattice-based scheme had to be chosen now, Falcon-1024 would be the preferred option for its balance of size, speed, and mature security assumptions. However, the short-term recommendation remains hash-based signatures (like SPHINCS+) for their lower risk, with a potential future hybrid or full transition to Falcon once its standard (FN-DSA) is finalized and well-supported.

marsbitHá 22m

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes