Ethereum Bearish Signal: Profit-Taking Transfers Spike

BitcoinistPublicado em 2023-06-06Última atualização em 2023-06-06

Resumo

On-chain data shows the Ethereum profit-taking transactions have surged recently, a sign that could be bearish for the asset's price....

On-chain data shows the Ethereum profit-taking transactions have surged recently, a sign that could be bearish for the asset’s price.
Ethereum Profit-Taking Volume Has Spiked To Highest Levels Since January
According to data from the on-chain analytics firm Santiment, a large amount of profit-taking seems to have been going on in the Ethereum market recently. The relevant indicator here is the “ratio of on-chain transaction volume in profit to loss,” which, as its name already suggests, tells us about how the profit-taking transfers currently compare with the loss-taking ones.


The indicator separates these two volumes by looking at the on-chain history of each coin being sold/moved to see what price it was last sold at. If this previous price for any coin was less than the price that it’s now being moved at again, then the metric naturally counts this sale inside the profit-taking volume.
On the other hand, the last selling price being more implies that the coin is being sold at a loss, and hence, the indicator adds its movement to the loss-taking volume.
Now, here is a chart that shows the trend in this ratio for Ethereum over the last half a year:

Ethereum Profit Taking Vs Loss


The value of the metric seems to have been quite high in recent days | Source: Santiment on Twitter
As displayed in the above graph, the Ethereum ratio between the profit and loss transaction volumes has observed an uplift during the past couple of days. The metric now has highly positive values.


Whenever the indicator has positive values, it means that the profit-taking volume is more than the loss-taking one right now. Thus, since the metric has green values currently, it would suggest that profit-taking transactions are the dominant force in the market.
During the spike in the ratio yesterday, the metric hit a peak value of 1.3, which means that there were 2.3 times as many profit-taking transfers happening on the blockchain as the loss-taking ones.
These metric values were the highest seen since back in January of this year when the rally had gone through its first leg. Historically, whenever investors have done a large amount of selling with the intent of harvesting profits, the cryptocurrency’s price has felt a bearish pressure.
This phenomenon can also be seen in the chart, as back in January the Ethereum rally slowed down its rapid upward trajectory when the profit-taking hit its peak.
When the profit-taking shot up yesterday, the price was above the $1,900 level. Since then, however, the asset has slid down below the mark, implying that the profit-taking may already be showing its impact.
Santiment believes that the ratio would have to cool back down if the price of Ethereum has to build a charge towards the $2,000 level.
At the time of writing, Ethereum is trading around $1,800, down 2% in the last week.

Ethereum Price Chart


ETH hasn't moved much in the last few days | Source: ETHUSD on TradingView

Leituras Relacionadas

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

Gold is experiencing its strongest rally since 1979, with prices reaching a record high near $5,600 per ounce in January. This surge is driven primarily by central banks, not retail investors. In 2025, central banks net purchased 863 tonnes of gold, with a similar increase expected in 2026. Traditional gold investment methods—physical bullion and ETFs—present trade-offs like storage issues, limited access, or management fees. Tokenized gold emerges as a third option: digital tokens representing ownership of physical bars stored in professional vaults. These tokens are globally transferable in seconds, divisible, and redeemable for physical metal. The potential impact mirrors that of dollar stablecoins. Stablecoins digitized the dollar, enabling cheap, instant, global transfers and driving adoption from $27 billion in 2020 to over $3 trillion today. Similarly, tokenized gold solves gold's "form problem"—its lack of divisibility, portability, and accessibility. Adoption is accelerating. In Q1 2026, tokenized gold trading volume hit $90.7 billion, surpassing the $84.6 billion for all of 2025. Its market cap exceeded $6 billion, growing 5.5 times faster than physical gold holdings in the quarter. While concerns about counterparty risk exist, tokenized gold represents a direct claim on allocated bars, with major issuers providing regular attestation reports. Just as stablecoins placed dollars on a digital, global rail, tokenized gold now offers a more practical form for this ancient asset, potentially expanding access to billions.

marsbitHá 16m

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

marsbitHá 16m

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

Japanese borrowing costs have hit their highest levels since 1996, with yields on 30-year bonds reaching 4.185%. This marks a significant shift for a country long reliant on negative rates. Concurrently, Bitcoin surged 22% past $80,000, seemingly decoupled from the bond market turmoil. Historically, the massive yen carry trade has fueled global risk assets, predicated on near-zero Japanese rates. This assumption is now challenged. A potential rate hike by the Bank of Japan in September could strengthen the yen, forcing carry trade unwinds and potentially triggering a global deleveraging event, as seen in August 2024 when Bitcoin fell sharply. Conversely, if the yen weakens further, Bitcoin could attract Japanese investors as a hedge against currency depreciation and the country's massive debt burden. Institutional adoption in Japan is growing, with regulatory changes paving the way for potential crypto ETFs by 2027. The key variable is the BoJ's September policy signal. If it hints at a rapid tightening cycle to combat inflation and support the yen, risk assets like Bitcoin may face selling pressure from carry trade liquidation. However, if debt sustainability concerns limit its hawkishness, leading to a weaker yen, Bitcoin could benefit. Currently, the market is betting on a slow-motion debt crisis, not a sudden collapse. While Bitcoin shows resilience, its fate remains tied to the direction of the yen and the scale of any carry trade unwind.

marsbitHá 19m

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

marsbitHá 19m

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

"Bitcoin's Quantum Defense: A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes" by the Blockstream Research Team explores how Bitcoin can transition to quantum-resistant digital signatures, as current schemes like Schnorr and ECDSA are vulnerable to quantum computers. The report evaluates three lattice-based signature candidates—Dilithium, Falcon, and Hawk—against criteria like on-chain cost (key/signature size), implementation complexity, deployment risks, and support for Bitcoin's key derivation standard (BIP-32). The analysis recommends a minimum Security Level 3 for Bitcoin due to its long-term security needs. Dilithium (ML-DSA) is praised for its simplicity and integer-only operations, making it easier to implement securely, but it has the largest signature size (~5.3 KB for Level 3). Falcon (FN-DSA) offers the most compact signatures (e.g., ~3.1 KB for Level 5) and the fastest verification, though its signing requires complex floating-point sampling—a solvable engineering challenge. Hawk, despite its small size, was withdrawn from NIST standardization after a security vulnerability was discovered, highlighting the importance of conservative security margins. Currently, neither Dilithium nor Falcon has a fully viable, production-ready BIP-32 key derivation method. The report concludes that if a lattice-based scheme had to be chosen now, Falcon-1024 would be the preferred option for its balance of size, speed, and mature security assumptions. However, the short-term recommendation remains hash-based signatures (like SPHINCS+) for their lower risk, with a potential future hybrid or full transition to Falcon once its standard (FN-DSA) is finalized and well-supported.

marsbitHá 21m

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

marsbitHá 21m

Trading

Spot
活动图片