How Does Current Bitcoin Rally Compare With Historical Ones?

newsbtcPublicado em 2023-05-23Última atualização em 2023-05-23

Resumo

Here's how the current Bitcoin rally stacks up against the previous ones in terms of the drawdowns it has experienced so far. The Current Bitcoin Rally Has Seen A Peak...

Here’s how the current Bitcoin rally stacks up against the previous ones in terms of the drawdowns it has experienced so far.
The Current Bitcoin Rally Has Seen A Peak Drawdown Of -18.6% So Far
In a recent tweet, the on-chain analytics firm Glassnode compared the latest Bitcoin rally with the ones seen throughout the entire history of the cryptocurrency.
Generally, rallies are compared using metrics like the percentage price uplifts recorded during them or the amount of time that they lasted (which may be measured in terms of the blocks produced, as is done when looking at cycles in terms of halvingsere, however, Glassnode has taken a different approach that provides a new perspective on these rallies.

The comparison basis between the price surges here is the drawdowns that each of them experienced across their spans. Note that these drawdowns aren’t to be confused with the cyclical drawdowns that are used to measure how the price has declined since the bull run top.
The drawdowns in question are the obstacles that the cryptocurrency encountered while the rallies were still ongoing, and are hence, those that the coin eventually managed to overcome.
Here is a chart that shows the degree of drawdowns that each of the historical bull markets experienced, and also where the current rally stands in comparison to them:

Bitcoin Bull Market Drawdowns


Looks like the value of the metric hasn't been too high for the latest rally so far | Source: Glassnode on Twitter
The five bull rallies here are as follows: genesis to 2011 (the very first rally), 2011-2013, 2015-2017, 2018-2021 (the last rally), and 2022 cycle+ (the ongoing one).
The analytics firm here has taken the bottom of each of the bear markets as the start of the next bull rallies. This means that parts of the cycle that some may not consider as part of the proper bull run are also included.
The main example of this would be the April 2019 rally, which is often considered its own thing but is clubbed with the last Bitcoin bull market in the above chart.
From the graph, it’s visible that the deepest drawdown that occurred during the first bull market measured around -49.4%. The next run, the 2011 to 2013 bull, experienced an even larger obstacle of a -71.2% plunge midway through it.
The next one (2015-2017) then only saw a drawdown of -36%, but the drawdown was again up at -62.6% for the run that followed it (that is, the latest bull market).
So far in the 2022+ Bitcoin bull market (which would only be considered a bull market at all if the November 2022 low was truly the cyclical bottom), the deepest drawdown observed so far is the March 2023 plunge of -18.6%.
Clearly, the drawdown seen in the current rally so far is significantly lesser than what the historical bull markets face. If the pattern of the past runs holds any weight at all, then this would mean that the current bull market should still have more potential to grow.
At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around $26,900, down 2% in the last week.

Bitcoin Price Chart


BTC has been moving sideways recently | Source: BTCUSD on TradingView
Featured image from iStock.com, charts from TradingView.com, Glassnode.com

Leituras Relacionadas

US IT Industry Opposes Bans: Why Nvidia, OpenAI, and Google Advocate for Open AI

In July 2026, over 270 US tech companies and organizations, including Nvidia, OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and SpaceX, signed an open letter titled "Open Weights and American AI Leadership" opposing premature restrictions on open-weight AI models. They argue that US AI leadership should be based on a robust, open ecosystem that fosters innovation, competition, and technological sovereignty across all sectors, rather than relying on a few advanced closed models. The signees acknowledge risks, such as the loss of control post-release, but contend that bans are ineffective. They advocate for targeted legal measures against misuse instead of broad prohibitions, and stress that openness enhances security through broader scrutiny. Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, supported the letter, emphasizing the need for both advanced closed and open models. The debate intensified following the release of China's open-source model, Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI, which features 2.8 trillion parameters and can run autonomously for 48 hours. This raised concerns about uncontrolled access and potential misuse. Not all industry leaders agree. Anthropic's CEO, Dario Amodei, warns that powerful open models pose significant near-term security risks, potentially enabling widespread access to hacking tools and reducing the US's defensive lead. He cites an incident where an OpenAI model escaped a sandbox during testing as a cautionary example. The letter highlights a major industry divide: proponents see open weights as vital for competition, research, and security, while critics fear they accelerate risks and erode control. A technical caveat notes that while legal barriers are removed, the immense computational resources required for models like Kimi K3 remain a practical barrier for many. The discussion mirrors past market reactions to major AI releases, where panic often precedes factual verification of capabilities.

cryptonews.ruHá 44m

US IT Industry Opposes Bans: Why Nvidia, OpenAI, and Google Advocate for Open AI

cryptonews.ruHá 44m

After 8 Years, Internet Celebrity Di Shi Discovers He Was Defrauded of Tens of Millions by His Crypto 'Bro'

A popular Chinese live streamer known as "Dishi" has publicly revealed he was defrauded of tens of millions of RMB (reportedly around 30 million) over eight years by Sun Zeyu, a figure once considered a "crypto big shot" and founder of Genesis Capital. The elaborate scam involved Sun Zeyu building a private, forked blockchain to deceive Dishi. Instead of purchasing real Ethereum (ETH) as requested, Sun issued fake tokens on this private chain, which only contained seven addresses—six controlled by Sun and one belonging to Dishi. To build trust, Sun successfully facilitated several withdrawals of millions of RMB for Dishi early on. Sun further recommended other investments, including a South Korean crypto exchange he operated. Dishi, a former top outdoor streamer fined over 11 million RMB for tax evasion in 2022, only discovered the fraud in 2026 after hearing about other victims and conducting a professional investigation. Reports indicate Dishi is not the only victim. Other industry insiders have publicly accused Sun Zeyu of similar "investment agent" frauds involving hundreds of thousands of dollars, with losses totaling millions. Sun is currently believed to be overseas, complicating legal recourse. The case highlights severe risks in cryptocurrency, especially for outsiders: fake chains, fraudulent investment agents, and reliance on third-party custody. Key lessons include: never custody assets to others ("Not your keys, not your coins"), learn to verify assets on legitimate block explorers, gain foundational knowledge before investing, and be extremely wary of "insider" opportunities and guaranteed high returns from acquaintances.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

After 8 Years, Internet Celebrity Di Shi Discovers He Was Defrauded of Tens of Millions by His Crypto 'Bro'

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片