BRC-20 Meme 热潮席卷比特币网络,BTC “见顶”跌破2.75万美元

比推Publicado em 2023-05-09Última atualização em 2023-05-09

Resumo

加密基金管理公司 BitBull Capital 首席执行官 Joe DiPasquale 分析道,自 3 月中旬左右的反弹以来,BTC 和 ETH 都没有测试过近期支撑。DiPasquale 表示,BTC 可能会在再次反弹之前测试 25,000 美元至 27,000 美元之间的支撑位,逢低买入 BTC 和 ETH 是一种“合理的策略”。

随着基于比特币 BRC-20 标准的 Meme (模因)代币交易量飙升至两年高位,比特币周一跌破2.75万美元,链上数据显示,从历史数据来看,模因币的投机狂热预示着比特币短期“见顶”或者看跌逆转。

meme热度“吸血”

根据区块链观察员 James Tolan 基于 Dune 分析的追踪器,上周加密市场的 meme 币交易量为 23 亿美元,比前一周的 3.87 亿美元增长了六倍,达到 2021 年 5 月以来的最高水平。

这波投机狂潮由 pepecoin (PEPE) 引领,一种以悲伤蛙表情包为主题的代币,于 4 月中旬推出,最大供应量为 420 万亿。上周五, PEPE 的市值突破10 亿美元,最终达到 18.2 亿美元的峰值,对于一个推出不到一个月的加密货币来说是一个惊人的成就。比推终端数据显示,截至发稿时,PEPE 的市值为 9.31 亿美元。

PEPE 热潮还刺激了对其他低市值代币的投机,如 DINO、WSB、CHAD 和 4TOKEN,这些代币在过去两周内上涨了百分之几百。Tolan认为,从历史上看,无实际用例的山寨币投机狂热预示着比特币的看跌逆转。

截至发稿时,比特币交易价格跌破 27,500 美元,24小时跌幅5%,美元指数 (DXY) 小幅反弹,美元指数衡量美元兑包括欧元在内的主要货币的汇率,比特币的走势通常与美元指数相反,该指数上周五在意外强劲的美国就业数据公布后短暂反弹至 101.75,目前徘徊在 101.37 附近。

BRC-20 代币费用创多年新高

随着围绕模因币的炒作越来越多,比特币网络的交易量不断增加。根据加密数据分析平台Dune Analytics 的数据,BRC-20 的每日铸币费在 5 月 7 日创下了 247 BTC 的历史新高,该数值表明该费用达到了两年来的最高水平。

BRC-20 代币标准是比特币区块链上的实验性代币标准,以以太坊的 ERC-20 为蓝本。BRC-20 代币标准由一位名叫 Domo(推特账号“ @domdata”)的匿名链上分析师于 3 月创建,它允许程序员通过Ordinals协议创建和发送可替代代币。

与 ERC-20 代币不同,BRC-20 代币不使用智能合约,并且需要比特币钱包来铸造和交易这些代币。

BRC-20 代币标准近几个月出现爆炸式增长,尤其是随着 Pepe (PEPE) 和 Memetic (MEME) 等模因币的出现。5 月 3 日,比特币网络累计支付的费用超过 350 万美元,比 4 月底激增 400%。BTC Ordinals 的总费用为 641 BTC,YCharts的数据显示,比特币 5 月 7 日的平均交易费用达到 19.21 美元。

比特币网络上的BRC-20 代币数量已超过 14,000,其中许多是模因币。这些币的总市值超过 9.52 亿美元,24 小时交易量超过 1000 万美元。

CPI前的抛售

谈到宏观经济因素,交易员本周重点关注 5 月 10 日发布的美国4 月份消费者价格指数 (CPI) ,以衡量美联储在降低通胀方面的进展,该指数追踪范围广泛的商品和服务的价格变动,其他关键数据包括初请失业金人数和生产者物价指数。当美联储积极提高利率以抑制通货膨胀时,投资者通常会出售“风险资产”。

CPI 被称为整个加密货币的波动催化剂,匿名交易员 Aqua在推文中分析称,市场或出现“战术性抛售”, BTC/USD 进入更广泛的修正区间。他写道:“如果 CPI 数据良好,我们也许还有一次冲高机会,但这看起来越来越像一个修正,我们一定会在未来几周看到市场调整”。

全球资产管理公司贝莱德5月8日发布报告称,央行与通胀的斗争远未结束,风险较高的资产今年可能会继续遭受重创。该公司预计,未来几个月世界各国央行将进一步收紧货币政策,将全球经济推入衰退。

加密基金管理公司 BitBull Capital 首席执行官 Joe DiPasquale 分析道,自 3 月中旬左右的反弹以来,BTC 和 ETH 都没有测试过近期支撑。DiPasquale 表示,BTC 可能会在再次反弹之前测试 25,000 美元至 27,000 美元之间的支撑位,逢低买入 BTC 和 ETH 是一种“合理的策略”。

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbitHá 1h

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbitHá 1h

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbitHá 2h

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbitHá 2h

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbitHá 2h

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片