[Featured Research]What Has Changed In Crypto Market?

MirrorPublicado em 2023-02-17Última atualização em 2023-02-19

Resumo

What Others Should We Know About The Market?

How crypto market has changed in 2023-- 5 lessons from recent bull run:

A closer look at the January mini bull run and what you can learn from it as an investor/speculator—

1. Rotation no more

Liquidity rotation used to be structural feature of crypto mkt— at onset of a bull run, large caps (BTC, ETH) rose the most & once mkt participants made gains on those, liquidity shifted to smaller caps, prompting them to pump next.

The rotation game is so 2021.

Most recent (mini) bull run in Jan 2023 showed different mkt progression. Once up cycle started in early Jan, it took mere 2 wks for 80%+ of tokens among top 1000 mkt caps to rise above their 40-day moving average.

In contrast, back in 2019 (similar stage of cycle) it took the mkt 3 mos & multiple small hype cycles for 80% of top tokens to rise over 40dma.

In other words, while there was distinctive liquidity rotation back in 2019, it doesn't work that way anymore. Once mkt up trend started everything that can go up goes up almost all at once.

Why the change?

Many reasons. For example—

Token listings on large exchanges have broadened. Mkt participant profiles have shifted & diversified. Rotation game has become public knowledge that everyone now wants to exploit & front run. Plus, a lot more liquidity on sideline now compared to a few yrs ago.

I'll talk abt what this means to you as individual investor in a min.

2. Underdogs lead recovery at market bottom

At mkt turning point coming out of long bear trend, downtrodden names that lead previous downturn also tend to lead subsequent recovery. This is a structural feature in other risk asset mkts as well not just crypto.

Chart below plots % gains in Jan 2023 against % gains in prior yr for mid-cap-and-above tokens (mkt cap > $250 mn). Study the chart & reach your own conclusion. Hopefully it's an obvious one.

Does this relationship hold in other market conditions? No.

This underdog-to-growth-star phenom is unique feature for when mkt has strong reversal from deep bottom.

3. Market cap matters (sort of)

There's significant inverse correlation btw token mkt cap and price gain among smaller cap tokens (<$230 mn mkt cap) during recent up move, after controlling for prior year price gain & age of token.

Among larger cap tokens this relationship does not exist esp in the $250 mn to $10 bn mkt cap range.

In other words conventional wisdom that smaller caps make bigger moves is true to some extent, but only if you're looking among small up-and-coming names, which is not practical for anyone w/ more than a few thousand $ to deploy since those are usually thinly traded.

4. Expect shorter cyclical moves in bear mkt

Bull runs in bear mks have shorter shelf life.

January mini bull run lasted in earnest for a month w/ majority of move done in 1st 2 wks of Jan. You can observe same pattern from previous run-up in July/August 2022.

These are distinctively shorter runs compared to up cycles in a bull mkt. The hostile macro environment means pumps are more fragile & prospect for continued buying demand after an up move is highly uncertain.

5. Rethink what the "fundamentals" mean

This is not a new pattern, but worth your attention b/c it'll persist.

Traditional metrics Wall St uses to evaluate company fundamentals—e.g. sales, earnings, margins— are mostly useless in crypto, at least at this stage.

I know it sounds politically incorrect but the biggest *fundamental* for any token is the amount of attention it can attract. Period.

What attracts attention?

For example:

· Over hyped themes— e.g. AI, zero knowledge, liquid staking.

· Big $ initiatives— e.g. $300 mn developer grants.

· Key personnel changes— e.g. famous so-and-so comes back as CTO.

Here's a list of top gaining tokens in Jan w/ $200 mn+ mkt cap (tokens w/ < 1 yr history excluded). Half have some attention driving narrative at play (aside from the fact, as discussed earlier, most of these are down horrendously bad, which is in itself an attention driver).

Do some research yourself. Can you identify what the driver is on each?

You may think a certain attention grabbing narrative is stupid or unjustified.

Well, first, tell that to the market & see if it cares.

Second, this is actually a rational behavior by the mkt despite appearing otherwise. Crypto projects at current stage are not steady money-making enterprises. They are experimental tech.

All that matters to the fate of experimental techs is whether they'll get mass-adopted. What would be a good predictor of that? The number of eyeballs they attract.

So the phenom of attention/narrative driving prices is really just mkt trying to deduce a project's growth prospect from however little information there is available. It's entirely rational if you ask me.

What all this means for you as an investor/speculator

What can you do to take advantage of evolving mkt features discussed above? A few ideas:

1. Be flexible & nimble when macro conditions are hostile. There'll be bull runs even in worst mkts but you need to act quickly & be vigilant on both entries & exists since these runs'll be more ephemeral than usual.

2. If you wait for rotation from large caps to the rest you'll be front run. There's hardly any rotation anymore. When mkt turns everything goes up together.

3. At mkt turning point out of major down trend, focus on beaten-down underdogs. If your capital size is small, focus on smaller caps as well.

4. Your time may be better spent researching the next attention-driving narratives & themes rather than studying technical analysis. Just sayin' ;)

Leituras Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHá 7h

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHá 7h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片