7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT Daily2026 World Cup Posting Challenge on HTX SquareHTXCommunity4thAnniversaryAxie Infinity falls 12% after $1.25 rejection - But THESE 2 AXS metrics suggestAxie Inf

World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT Daily

2026 World Cup Posting Challenge on HTX Square

Axie Infinity falls 12% after $1.25 rejection - But THESE 2 AXS metrics suggestAxie Infinity [$AXS] surrendered a large portion of its recent advance after sellers stepped in near the $1.25 area and pushed the token lower.

The asset traded at $1.03 at press time, reflecting a 12.3% decline over the last 24 hours. Despite the retracement, market activity intensified rather than faded.

Trading volume climbed 67.3% to $71.34 million, indicating that participants remained highly engaged during the correction.

Earlier, $AXS delivered a sharp breakout move that attracted fresh interest across the market. However, the latest decline suggested that many traders secured profits following the rapid rise.

Even so, elevated volume showed that buyers and sellers continued battling for control, keeping $AXS among the more actively traded assets in the market.

Are spot buyers absorbing the selling pressure? Spot market participants continued showing interest despite the recent decline.

According to CryptoQuant analytics, the Spot Taker CVD remained buyer-dominant, revealing that market buy orders continued to outweigh sell orders across the observed period. The trend suggested buyers had not fully stepped away even as the token corrected from its local high.

While price moved lower, spot demand remained relatively firm, creating an interesting divergence between market activity and price action

Axie Infinity falls 12% after $1.25 rejection - Bu

HTXCommunity4thAnniversary

LISTA chatter is neutral/low, focused on borrowing rates, stablecoin strategies, and yield/staking. On May 28, Lista DAO launched Smart Swap powered by LI.FI; on Jun 1, Lista Credit Phase 1 concluded,

HTX Invites You to Share 600K USDT in Gift Packs

$RARE SHOWS BULLISH REVERSAL POTENTIAL FOLLOWING LOCAL LIQUIDITY SWEEP 🎯 Entry: 0.01245 - 0.01255 🔥 Target: 0.01280, 0.01300, 0.01330 🚀 Stop Loss: 0.01230 ⚠️ $RARE has demonstrated significant strengt

KAIA chatter is bullish but low-engagement, citing ecosystem activity and Korean dev interest. On May 26, Kaia published a DeFi guide (Morpho via Feather). On Jun 19, KIP’s Yield8 fund integrated 8per

$QNTX USDT is showing strong bullish momentum, trading comfortably above MA5, MA10, and MA20 after a sharp breakout. Buyers remain in control, but after a rapid move higher I'd rather wait for a pullb

$QNTX USDT is showing strong bullish momentum, trading comfortably above MA5, MA10, and MA20 after a sharp breakout. Buyers remain in control, but after a rapid move higher I'd rather wait for a pullback than chase price.


Entry: $74.00 - $77.00
TP1: $82.00
TP2: $90.00
TP3: $100.00
SL: $69.00


The trend remains strong with price holding above key support levels. As long as momentum stays intact, the path of least resistance remains to the upside.


NFA. Protect capital first.



BTC Prophet: 20-Day 380 Million HTX Challenge

USDT is showing strong bullish momentum, trading comfortably above MA5, MA10, and MA20 after a sharp breakout. Buyers remain in control, but after a rapid move higher I'd rather wait for a pullback than chase price.


Entry: $74.00 - $77.00
TP1: $82.00
TP2: $90.00
TP3: $100.00
SL: $69.00


The trend remains strong with price holding above key support levels. As long as momentum stays intact, the path of least resistance remains to the upside.


NFA. Protect capital first.

#World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT Daily #BTC Prophet: 20-Day 380 Million HTX Challenge #1$ Margin Trade 



I Used To Think People Avoided AI Because They Were Worried It Would Replace Them. But The More I Watch Users, The More I Think The Real Fear Is Something Else. People are not only asking whether AI i

World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT DailyTradFi Trading Strategies Sharing ChallengeHTX Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500U 💥 Uniswap has pulled back below the $3 level after a sharp but short-li

TradFi Trading Strategies Sharing Challenge

HTX  Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500U 💥

 Uniswap has pulled back below the $3 level after a sharp but short-lived rally that briefly pushed the token above $3.60, following a highly bullish long-term forecast from Standard Chartered.

According to market data, $UNI recently traded around $2.98 on June 23, still holding some gains compared to its mid-June levels, despite cooling off from its local peak earlier in the week.

The initial surge came after Standard Chartered initiated coverage of Uniswap and projected that the token could reach $100 by 2030, a forecast that sparked strong speculative interest across the market.
 What triggered the move:

Standard Chartered’s long-term bullish forecast for UNI

Rapid inflows into derivatives and leveraged trading positions

Increased attention on decentralized exchange growth narratives


However, momentum quickly faded as UNI approached the $3.70 zone, where profit-taking intensified and buying pressure weakened.Market reaction:

Futures trading activity surged during the rally, then cooled

Short-term traders locked in profits after fast upside moves

On-chain data shows mixed behavior among large holders (some selling into strength, others accumulating near $3 levels)


📉 Current situation: Despite the pullback, UNI remains significantly above its early-June lows, but the price action highlights how quickly sentiment can shift in highly speculative DeFi tokens.

Analysts suggest the market is now split between:

Long-term believers in decentralized exchange growth

Short-term traders reacting to volatility and resistance levels


Overall, the $100 projection has acted more as a narrative driver than an immediate price target, while real market behavior continues to be driven by liquidity cycles, leverage, and profit-taking pressure.

Uniswap has pulled back below the $3 level afte

Trading is live again on THORChain after a month-long shutdown brought on by a mid-May exploit that siphoned about $10.7 million from one vault. The protocol announced on June 23 that swaps, signing, 

THORChain Restarts Trading After $10.7M Exploit; Vaults Quarantined and Keyshares Verified

World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT DailyBTC Prophet: 20-Day 380 Million HTX ChallengeHTX Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500U 💥 Mysterious trader bets multimillion short amid job cuts As the cryp

Mysterious trader bets multimillion short amid job cuts

As the crypto industry goes through one of its most difficult phases, the Ethereum Foundation has announced cutting around 20% of its staff.

The drastic job cut, announced on June 23, affects 54 employees, as the team said it aims to become “leaner and more focused” in running operations.

Related: Mysterious trader opens massive SpaceX short ahead of Nasdaq debut

Over the past few months, the Ethereum Foundation has seen the exit of several top executives such as co-executive directors Hsiao-Wei Wang and Tomasz Kajetan Stańczak, protocol co-lead Barnabé Monnot, protocol cluster lead Tim Beiko, contributors Josh Stark and Trenton Van Epps, researchers Julian Ma and Carl Beekhuizen, and senior solutions architect Pablo Voorvaart.



Mysterious trader bets multimillion short amid job

World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT Daily2026 World Cup Posting Challenge on HTX SquareHTXCommunity4thAnniversarySpaceX's $600 billion plunge erased nearly half of bitcoin's market cap in three days.S

SpaceX's $600 billion plunge erased nearly half of bitcoin's market cap in three days.SpaceX's stock has lost more than $600 billion in market value over three trading days, which is nearly half of bitcoin's $1.3 trillion market cap, after announcing its first bond sale.

Bitcoin fell less than 1% over the same stretch, holding near $63,600, per CoinDesk data.

The stock dropped 16% on Monday to $154.60, its lowest since its June 12 debut, taking its three-day decline to about 23%. The trigger was supposedly plan to sell at least $20 billion of bonds, the company's first time borrowing in the debt markets, to fund the artificial-intelligence buildout it took on when it bought Elon Musk's xAl in February.

a

SpaceX chose to borrow rather than issue new shares, which would have diluted existing holders. A week ago it, was worth nearly $2.5 trillion and had briefly passed Amazon and Microsoft but now sits just above $2 trillion.

The selling ran into Tuesday, with a perpetual futures contract that tracks SpaceX on Hyperliquid down another 15% to around $151.

Part of the move is structure. SpaceX trades on a thin float, meaning only a small share of its stock is available to trade, so each move is amplified and the 16% single-session drop on a single headline reflects that thinness.

Bitcoin's market is far deeper and more liquid, which is part of why it took the same week in stride

SpaceX's $600 billion plunge erased nearly half of

World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT DailyHTX Invites You to Share 600K USDT in Gift PacksBTC Prophet: 20-Day 380 Million HTX ChallengeIt took seven full days for anyone to realize $4.67 million had walked out of the Axelar to Secret Network bridge. The drain happened on June 10, and nobody on either side noticed until June 17, when a routine cross-chain transfer failed and someone went to check the escrow balance on the Axelar side. The account was empty. Because Secret Network is built around a privacy-by-default design where contract state and transaction details are shielded from public view, the on-chain footprints that usually tip off security researchers within minutes were simply invisible. That gave the attacker an entire week of breathing room while the funds were quietly moved off. Axelar's emergency committee has since disabled the Secret and Secret-SNIP connections, but the money is already gone. An infinite-mint bug, wrapped in a custom contract The vulnerability lived in a modified CW20-ICS20 contract on the Secret side of the bridge, which is the piece of code that handles inbound assets arriving over Cosmos IBC and mints Secret-wrapped versions of them. Those wrapped versions are the saTokens that DeFi users on Secret actually hold and trade. The attacker is accused of doing something elegantly simple: spinning up their own single-validator Cosmos chain, opening a brand new IBC channel directly to the Secret bridge contract, then self-relaying forged packets that carried token denominations matching the contract's allow-list. The contract checked which denomination was coming in. It did not check which channel that denomination was supposed to be coming from. That single missing check is the entire story. Because the saToken contract trusted any properly-formatted IBC packet carrying a known denomination, the attacker was free to mint fully-backed-looking saUSDT, saUSDC, saDAI, saWETH, saWBTC, saWBNB and sawstETH out of thin air. Those fresh

It took seven full days for anyone to realize $4.67 million had walked out of the Axelar to Secret Network bridge. The drain happened on June 10, and nobody on either side noticed until June 17, when a routine cross-chain transfer failed and someone went to check the escrow balance on the Axelar side. The account was empty. Because Secret Network is built around a privacy-by-default design where contract state and transaction details are shielded from public view, the on-chain footprints that usually tip off security researchers within minutes were simply invisible. That gave the attacker an entire week of breathing room while the funds were quietly moved off. Axelar's emergency committee has since disabled the Secret and Secret-SNIP connections, but the money is already gone.

An infinite-mint bug, wrapped in a custom contract

The vulnerability lived in a modified CW20-ICS20 contract on the Secret side of the bridge, which is the piece of code that handles inbound assets arriving over Cosmos IBC and mints Secret-wrapped versions of them. Those wrapped versions are the saTokens that DeFi users on Secret actually hold and trade. The attacker is accused of doing something elegantly simple: spinning up their own single-validator Cosmos chain, opening a brand new IBC channel directly to the Secret bridge contract, then self-relaying forged packets that carried token denominations matching the contract's allow-list. The contract checked which denomination was coming in. It did not check which channel that denomination was supposed to be coming from.

That single missing check is the entire story. Because the saToken contract trusted any properly-formatted IBC packet carrying a known denomination, the attacker was free to mint fully-backed-looking saUSDT, saUSDC, saDAI, saWETH, saWBTC, saWBNB and sawstETH out of thin air. Those fresh

<div class="RichTextParagraph RichText" node-type="RichTextParagraph">
<a class="RichTextArticle" node-type="RichTextArticle" href="holigeit://open/v1?url=ihuobiglobal://m.hbg.com/content/topicDetail?topicId=1313" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-id=1313>World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT Daily</a><a class="RichTextArticle" node-type="RichTextArticle" href="holigeit://open/v1?url=ihuobiglobal://m.hbg.com/content/topicDetail?topicId=1317" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-id=1317>HTX Invites You to Share 600K USDT in Gift Packs</a><a class="RichTextArticle" node-type="RichTextArticle" href="holigeit://open/v1?url=ihuobiglobal://m.hbg.com/content/topicDetail?topicId=942" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-id=942>BTC Prophet: 20-Day 380 Million HTX Challenge</a><span class="RichTextText" node-type="RichTextText">It took seven full days for anyone to realize $4.67 million had walked out of the Axelar to Secret Network bridge. The drain happened on June 10, and nobody on either side noticed until June 17, when a routine cross-chain transfer failed and someone went to check the escrow balance on the Axelar side. The account was empty. Because Secret Network is built around a privacy-by-default design where contract state and transaction details are shielded from public view, the on-chain footprints that usually tip off security researchers within minutes were simply invisible. That gave the attacker an entire week of breathing room while the funds were quietly moved off. Axelar's emergency committee has since disabled the Secret and Secret-SNIP connections, but the money is already gone.

An infinite-mint bug, wrapped in a custom contract

The vulnerability lived in a modified CW20-ICS20 contract on the Secret side of the bridge, which is the piece of code that handles inbound assets arriving over Cosmos IBC and mints Secret-wrapped versions of them. Those wrapped versions are the saTokens that DeFi users on Secret actually hold and trade. The attacker is accused of doing something elegantly simple: spinning up their own single-validator Cosmos chain, opening a brand new IBC channel directly to the Secret bridge contract, then self-relaying forged packets that carried token denominations matching the contract's allow-list. The contract checked which denomination was coming in. It did not check which channel that denomination was supposed to be coming from.

That single missing check is the entire story. Because the saToken contract trusted any properly-formatted IBC packet carrying a known denomination, the attacker was free to mint fully-backed-looking saUSDT, saUSDC, saDAI, saWETH, saWBTC, saWBNB and sawstETH out of thin air. Those fresh</span></div>

It took seven full days for anyone to realize $4.6

SpaceX IPO Unlock Timeline

A Panoramic View of the Solana Privacy Ecosystem: The Complete Privacy Stack from Computation to AI

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

Ethereum Advances Glamsterdam Upgrade Ahead of Planned 2026 Launch

Cursor's New 1.5T Model Abandons Kimi Foundation, $60 Billion Stock Swap for Cursor, Musk's First Move Targets Microsoft's GitHub

3B Small Model's Programming Scores Rival Opus 4.5, Mysterious Model Sparks Heated Discussion, Turns Out to be Domestic

Breaking: Google Gemini Co-Head Poached by OpenAI

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

It took seven full days for anyone to realize $4.6

Todos os comentários0Mais recentePopular

Tópicos em destaque