Crypto Bill Backlash: Senators Warn Stablecoin Act Isn’t Safe

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-05-04Última atualização em 2025-05-05

Resumo

What began as a promising effort to apply transparent rules to crypto and stablecoins has run into a serious roadblock....

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

What began as a promising effort to apply transparent rules to crypto and stablecoins has run into a serious roadblock.

On May 4, 2025, ten US Senators came out swinging against the revised version of the “GENIUS Act,” stating that it might do more harm than good. The action, according to an X post by crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett, caught many off guard, particularly because some of the individuals on the list had supported the bill just weeks earlier.

Among the opposing critics are four Democrats—Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner, Marilyn Strickland Kim, and Lisa Blunt Rochester—who were all in support of the bill in March in the Senate Banking Committee hearing.

Their change adds fresh weight to mounting concerns the proposed rules have the potential to undermine anti-money laundering protections and put financial stability at risk. Angela Alsobrooks, a co-sponsor of the bill from its inception, refused to sign the opposition letter.

Senators’ Alarm Bells Ring Over National Security And AML Loopholes

From the joint statement issued by the senators, the latest draft bill omits essential safeguards. The concerns of theirs are most prominent regarding national security and a weak presence of anti-money laundering (AML) protections. They also cautioned against ambiguous regulations that may expose crypto markets to exploitation.

The legislation, technically titled the “Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act,” was proposed in February 2025. Supporters said it would allow the US to remain competitive in financial technology without endangering consumers. But this latest backlash is an indication lawmakers are not all on the same page when it comes to “safe.”

Crypto Investors Left In The Dark Again?

The backlash adds more unpredictability into an already volatile crypto market. Only one day before the senators issued their statement, the new language in the bill was revealed. Traders and investors who were awaiting clarity are now left waiting once again. If lawmakers cannot make up their minds on the gist of the bill, it may be months before any version gets signed.

Image: The Shib Daily

That sort of delay can be damaging. Payment stablecoins are pegged to the US dollar and are frequently employed as a haven in times of turbulent market fluctuations. Without clear direction from legislators, crypto exchanges and developers might be reluctant to develop or expand within the US.

The backlash is notable because it occurs as the Senate is attempting to rush the bill through — and as news organizations investigate US President Donald Trump’s crypto ventures and potential connections involving his relatives.

AI And Blockchain Projects Could Feel The Heat

Among the bill’s objectives are spurring innovation where blockchain and artificial intelligence intersect. That’s why opposition from the senators is causing eyebrows to be raised in the tech community, as well.

Tokens backing AI programs created on blockchain could be indirectly impacted if money and policy backing become mired in Washington’s political stalemates.

Featured image from Bitwave, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Leituras Relacionadas

The 2026 Showdown: Will the Financial Super App Ultimately Belong to HOOD or COIN?

Coinbase and Robinhood are competing to build the ultimate financial super app, but with distinct strategies. Robinhood (HOOD) is creating an all-in-one platform for everyday financial life, targeting a young user base (75% under 44) with its digital banking features, Robinhood Gold subscription, and integrated services like stock trading, crypto, and a 3% cash-back card. It aims to capture the generational wealth transfer and keep users within its ecosystem. Coinbase (COIN) is building a crypto-native super app with recent updates like 24/5 commission-free stock trading, prediction markets via Kalshi, and a DEX aggregator. Beyond its user-facing app, Coinbase’s larger vision is to become the backend infrastructure for traditional finance (TradFi), offering crypto custody, stablecoin-as-a-service, and institutional solutions. Its revenue is diversifying, with 41% from subscriptions and services in Q3 2025. While both are expanding into each other’s territories—Robinhood with tokenized stocks and its own chain, Coinbase with extended trading hours and stock perps—their core visions differ: Robinhood wants to be the user’s financial home, and Coinbase aims to be the pipes powering the on-chain economy. Both face risks like costly incentives (HOOD) and stagnant user growth (COIN), and their stocks have seen significant rallies. The race in 2026 will test which foundation proves stronger.

marsbitHá 19m

The 2026 Showdown: Will the Financial Super App Ultimately Belong to HOOD or COIN?

marsbitHá 19m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de T (T) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片