ZachXBT flags suspected Trust Wallet extension issue as users report drained funds

ambcrypto发布于2025-12-25更新于2025-12-25

文章摘要

Security concerns emerged around the Trust Wallet browser extension on December 25, after blockchain investigator ZachXBT flagged suspicious activity potentially linked to a recent update. Reports suggest a supply-chain compromise may have been introduced in a December 24 update, where newly added code could silently exfiltrate sensitive wallet data—particularly during seed phrase imports—leading to immediate fund draining. Multiple users reported losses, with unverified estimates exceeding $2 million. The malicious code allegedly sent data to a recently registered external domain mimicking Trust Wallet infrastructure. The issue appears limited to the browser extension, with no evidence of mobile app compromise. Trust Wallet has not yet issued an official response or advisory. Researchers emphasize the situation remains under investigation, warning users to avoid importing seed phrases into the extension until clarified. If confirmed, this would represent a significant supply-chain attack.

Security concerns have emerged around the Trust Wallet browser extension on 25 December, after blockchain investigator ZachXBT flagged suspicious activity potentially linked to a recent update, prompting warnings from developers and security-focused accounts.

According to posts circulating on X, the issue may stem from a suspected supply-chain compromise introduced in a 24 December browser extension update.

Newly added code within the extension could silently exfiltrate sensitive wallet data when users import a seed phrase. The claims suggest that this has led to immediate wallet draining.

Alleged Trust Wallet malicious code and data exfiltration claims

Developers examining the extension allege that a JavaScript file added in the update contains logic disguised as analytics.

The code is said to activate specifically when a seed phrase is imported. It then silently transmits wallet-related data to an external domain designed to resemble official Trust Wallet infrastructure.

The domain referenced in the reports was reportedly registered only days ago and has since gone offline.

Researchers argue that its recent creation and the timing of the extension update raise concerns about a coordinated supply-chain attack rather than user-side phishing.

Users report wallet drains following seed imports

Multiple users have reported wallets being drained shortly after importing seed phrases into the Trust Wallet browser extension.

Publicly shared estimates suggest that more than $2 million may have been lost. Although these figures have not been independently verified.

Analysts indicate that funds were routed through multiple addresses, a pattern more commonly associated with automated exploitation than isolated user error.

Scope appears limited to browser extension

At this stage, there is no indication that Trust Wallet’s mobile applications are affected.

The warnings circulating online are focused specifically on the browser extension. This is where update mechanisms and third-party dependencies present higher supply-chain risk.

Users are advised not to import seed phrases into the Trust Wallet browser extension until further clarification is provided.

No official response from Trust Wallet yet

As of the time of writing, Trust Wallet has not issued any public response, clarification, or security advisory addressing the allegations.

There has been no confirmation or denial of the claims, nor any announcement of an extension, rollback, or emergency patch.

Investigation ongoing

Researchers have emphasized that the situation remains under active investigation. Conclusions should not be drawn until the extension code and related on-chain activity have been fully reviewed.

If confirmed, the incident would represent a serious supply-chain compromise.

This is a class of attack that differs significantly from phishing or user-side mistakes. Also, it has historically resulted in rapid, large-scale losses across the crypto ecosystem.


Final Thoughts

  • The allegations point to a potentially serious supply-chain risk affecting wallet extensions, underscoring how code updates can become a critical attack vector if compromised.
  • With no response yet from Trust Wallet, users and researchers are left relying on independent investigation as scrutiny around the incident continues.

相关问答

QWhat security concern was flagged by ZachXBT regarding the Trust Wallet browser extension?

AZachXBT flagged suspicious activity potentially linked to a recent update of the Trust Wallet browser extension, suggesting it could be a supply-chain compromise that leads to the silent exfiltration of sensitive wallet data and immediate draining of funds.

QHow does the suspected malicious code in the Trust Wallet extension allegedly operate?

AThe malicious JavaScript code, added in an update and disguised as analytics, is said to activate when a user imports a seed phrase. It then silently transmits wallet-related data to an external domain designed to look like official Trust Wallet infrastructure.

QWhat is the estimated financial impact based on user reports, and how were the funds moved?

APublicly shared estimates suggest that more than $2 million may have been lost, though this is unverified. Analysts indicate the funds were routed through multiple addresses, a pattern associated with automated exploitation rather than isolated user error.

QAre Trust Wallet's mobile applications also affected by this suspected compromise?

ANo, there is no indication that Trust Wallet’s mobile applications are affected. The warnings are specifically focused on the browser extension, which has higher supply-chain risk due to its update mechanisms and third-party dependencies.

QWhat is the current status of Trust Wallet's official response to these allegations?

AAs of the time the article was written, Trust Wallet had not issued any public response, clarification, or security advisory addressing the allegations. There has been no confirmation, denial, or announcement of an emergency patch.

你可能也喜欢

谷歌搜索结果中发现包含加密货币钱包密钥的Claude对话

7月25日,一名Reddit用户发现,通过在Google搜索“site:claude.ai/share”,可以找到数百条其他用户与Anthropic的AI助手Claude的对话记录。泄露内容包含加密货币钱包的助记词、API密钥、带有姓名和电话的简历,以及疑似美国社会安全号码的信息。 问题源于Claude的“分享”功能。该功能生成的链接本应类似于YouTube的“非公开”视频,仅限拥有链接者访问,但由于页面缺少禁止搜索引擎索引的“noindex”元标签,导致Google自动收录了这些公开分享的对话。尽管Anthropic的robots.txt文件试图阻止爬虫,但Google仍可能通过其他公开渠道发现链接并将其编入索引。 除私人对话外,通过“site:claude.ai/public/artifacts”还可找到用户创建的工件,如包含姓名的薪资表、企业CRM数据导出和未发布的产品计划。截至7月26日,Anthropic已为相关页面添加noindex标签,Google开始将其移出搜索结果,但部分内容已被复制存档。GitHub上已出现包含453段Claude对话和519段Grok对话的合集。 类似事件在2025年8月也曾发生在OpenAI身上,其“使聊天可搜索”功能意外将大量对话泄露给搜索引擎。更早之前,Google也曾索引过DeepSeek AI助手的用户对话。此次事件再次凸显了AI聊天分享功能可能带来的隐私风险。

cryptonews.ru58分钟前

谷歌搜索结果中发现包含加密货币钱包密钥的Claude对话

cryptonews.ru58分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片